14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Immunogenicity and Clinical Efficacy of Influenza Vaccination in Pregnancy

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Pregnant women are at high risk from influenza due to disproportionate morbidity, mortality, and adverse pregnancy outcomes following infection. As such, they are classified as a high-priority group for vaccination. However, changes in the maternal immune system required to accommodate the allogeneic fetus may alter the immunogenicity of influenza vaccines. A large number of studies have evaluated the safety of the influenza vaccine. Here, we will review available studies on the immunogenicity and efficacy of the influenza vaccine during pregnancy, focusing on both humoral and cellular immunity.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Pregnancy and infection.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Detection of antibody to avian influenza A (H5N1) virus in human serum by using a combination of serologic assays.

            From May to December 1997, 18 cases of mild to severe respiratory illness caused by avian influenza A (H5N1) viruses were identified in Hong Kong. The emergence of an avian virus in the human population prompted an epidemiological investigation to determine the extent of human-to-human transmission of the virus and risk factors associated with infection. The hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay, the standard method for serologic detection of influenza virus infection in humans, has been shown to be less sensitive for the detection of antibodies induced by avian influenza viruses. Therefore, we developed a more sensitive microneutralization assay to detect antibodies to avian influenza in humans. Direct comparison of an HI assay and the microneutralization assay demonstrated that the latter was substantially more sensitive in detecting human antibodies to H5N1 virus in infected individuals. An H5-specific indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was also established to test children's sera. The sensitivity and specificity of the microneutralization assay were compared with those of an H5-specific indirect ELISA. When combined with a confirmatory H5-specific Western blot test, the specificities of both assays were improved. Maximum sensitivity (80%) and specificity (96%) for the detection of anti-H5 antibody in adults aged 18 to 59 years were achieved by using the microneutralization assay combined with Western blotting. Maximum sensitivity (100%) and specificity (100%) in detecting anti-H5 antibody in sera obtained from children less than 15 years of age were achieved by using ELISA combined with Western blotting. This new test algorithm is being used for the seroepidemiologic investigations of the avian H5N1 influenza outbreak.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Pregnancy and pregnancy-associated hormones alter immune responses and disease pathogenesis.

              During pregnancy, it is evolutionarily advantageous for inflammatory immune responses that might lead to fetal rejection to be reduced and anti-inflammatory responses that promote transfer of maternal antibodies to the fetus to be increased. Hormones modulate the immunological shift that occurs during pregnancy. Estrogens, including estradiol and estriol, progesterone, and glucocorticoids increase over the course of pregnancy and affect transcriptional signaling of inflammatory immune responses at the maternal-fetal interface and systemically. During pregnancy, the reduced activity of natural killer cells, inflammatory macrophages, and helper T cell type 1 (Th1) cells and production of inflammatory cytokines, combined with the higher activity of regulatory T cells and production of anti-inflammatory cytokines, affects disease pathogenesis. The severity of diseases caused by inflammatory responses (e.g., multiple sclerosis) is reduced and the severity of diseases that are mitigated by inflammatory responses (e.g., influenza and malaria) is increased during pregnancy. For some infectious diseases, elevated inflammatory responses that are necessary to control and clear a pathogen have a negative consequence on the outcome of pregnancy. The bidirectional interactions between hormones and the immune system contribute to both the outcome of pregnancy and female susceptibility to disease. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                URI : http://frontiersin.org/people/u/240406
                URI : http://frontiersin.org/people/u/57935
                Journal
                Front Immunol
                Front Immunol
                Front. Immunol.
                Frontiers in Immunology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-3224
                04 June 2015
                2015
                : 6
                : 289
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Blish Laboratory, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine , Stanford, CA, USA
                [2] 2Blish Laboratory, Department of Medicine and Stanford Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine , Stanford, CA, USA
                Author notes

                Edited by: Arun Kumar, GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, Italy

                Reviewed by: Susanne Modrow, University of Regensburg, Germany; Daniel Olive, Institut Paoli Calmettes, France; Lisa Christian, The Ohio State University, USA

                *Correspondence: Catherine A. Blish, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305-5107, USA, cblish@ 123456stanford.edu

                Specialty section: This article was submitted to Immunotherapies and Vaccines, a section of the journal Frontiers in Immunology

                Article
                10.3389/fimmu.2015.00289
                4455389
                26089824
                b07cec48-0e62-4ec3-87cc-044868491940
                Copyright © 2015 Kay and Blish.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 27 March 2015
                : 19 May 2015
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 52, Pages: 9, Words: 7718
                Categories
                Immunology
                Review

                Immunology
                influenza,pregnancy,inactivated influenza vaccine,immunogenicity,antibody
                Immunology
                influenza, pregnancy, inactivated influenza vaccine, immunogenicity, antibody

                Comments

                Comment on this article