37
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Whole grain-rich diet reduces body weight and systemic low-grade inflammation without inducing major changes of the gut microbiome: a randomised cross-over trial

      research-article
      1 , 2 , 3 , 2 , 3 , 3 , 4 , 1 , 3 , 5 , 2 , 4 , 6 , 5 , 5 , 7 , 8 , 8 , 9 , 9 , 1 , 6 , 6 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 2 , 7 , 15 , 1 , 16 , 17 , 6 , 18 , 6 , 19 , 3 , 2 , 20 , 6 , 2 , 3 , 1
      Gut
      BMJ Publishing Group
      colonic microflora, diet, immune response, inflammation, obesity

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To investigate whether a whole grain diet alters the gut microbiome and insulin sensitivity, as well as biomarkers of metabolic health and gut functionality.

          Design

          60 Danish adults at risk of developing metabolic syndrome were included in a randomised cross-over trial with two 8-week dietary intervention periods comprising whole grain diet and refined grain diet, separated by a washout period of ≥6 weeks. The response to the interventions on the gut microbiome composition and insulin sensitivity as well on measures of glucose and lipid metabolism, gut functionality, inflammatory markers, anthropometry and urine metabolomics were assessed.

          Results

          50 participants completed both periods with a whole grain intake of 179±50 g/day and 13±10 g/day in the whole grain and refined grain period, respectively. Compliance was confirmed by a difference in plasma alkylresorcinols (p<0.0001). Compared with refined grain, whole grain did not significantly alter glucose homeostasis and did not induce major changes in the faecal microbiome. Also, breath hydrogen levels, plasma short-chain fatty acids, intestinal integrity and intestinal transit time were not affected. The whole grain diet did, however, compared with the refined grain diet, decrease body weight (p<0.0001), serum inflammatory markers, interleukin (IL)-6 (p=0.009) and C-reactive protein (p=0.003). The reduction in body weight was consistent with a reduction in energy intake, and IL-6 reduction was associated with the amount of whole grain consumed, in particular with intake of rye.

          Conclusion

          Compared with refined grain diet, whole grain diet did not alter insulin sensitivity and gut microbiome but reduced body weight and systemic low-grade inflammation.

          Trial registration number

          NCT01731366; Results.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Dietary Fiber-Induced Improvement in Glucose Metabolism Is Associated with Increased Abundance of Prevotella.

            The gut microbiota plays an important role in human health by interacting with host diet, but there is substantial inter-individual variation in the response to diet. Here we compared the gut microbiota composition of healthy subjects who exhibited improved glucose metabolism following 3-day consumption of barley kernel-based bread (BKB) with those who responded least to this dietary intervention. The Prevotella/Bacteroides ratio was higher in responders than non-responders after BKB. Metagenomic analysis showed that the gut microbiota of responders was enriched in Prevotella copri and had increased potential to ferment complex polysaccharides after BKB. Finally, germ-free mice transplanted with microbiota from responder human donors exhibited improved glucose metabolism and increased abundance of Prevotella and liver glycogen content compared with germ-free mice that received non-responder microbiota. Our findings indicate that Prevotella plays a role in the BKB-induced improvement in glucose metabolism observed in certain individuals, potentially by promoting increased glycogen storage.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Effect of inulin on the human gut microbiota: stimulation of Bifidobacterium adolescentis and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii.

              Prebiotics are food ingredients that improve health by modulating the colonic microbiota. The bifidogenic effect of the prebiotic inulin is well established; however, it remains unclear which species of Bifidobacterium are stimulated in vivo and whether bacterial groups other than lactic acid bacteria are affected by inulin consumption. Changes in the faecal microbiota composition were examined by real-time PCR in twelve human volunteers after ingestion of inulin (10 g/d) for a 16-d period in comparison with a control period without any supplement intake. The prevalence of most bacterial groups examined did not change after inulin intake, although the low G+C % Gram-positive species Faecalibacterium prausnitzii exhibited a significant increase (10.3% for control period v. 14.5% during inulin intake, P=0.019). The composition of the genus Bifidobacterium was studied in four of the volunteers by clone library analysis. Between three and five Bifidobacterium spp. were found in each volunteer. Bifidobacterium adolescentis and Bifidobacterium longum were present in all volunteers, and Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum, Bifidobacterium animalis, Bifidobacterium bifidum and Bifidobacterium dentium were also detected. Real-time PCR was employed to quantify the four most prevalent Bifidobacterium spp., B. adolescentis, B. longum, B. pseudocatenulatum and B. bifidum, in ten volunteers carrying detectable levels of bifidobacteria. B. adolescentis showed the strongest response to inulin consumption, increasing from 0.89 to 3.9% of the total microbiota (P=0.001). B. bifidum was increased from 0.22 to 0.63% (P<0.001) for the five volunteers for whom this species was present.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Gut
                Gut
                gutjnl
                gut
                Gut
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                0017-5749
                1468-3288
                January 2019
                1 November 2017
                : 68
                : 1
                : 83-93
                Affiliations
                [1 ] departmentNational Food Institute , Technical University of Denmark , Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
                [2 ] departmentDepartment of Bio and Heath Informatics , Technical University of Denmark , Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
                [3 ] departmentDepartment of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, Faculty of Science , University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark
                [4 ] departmentDepartment of Veterinary Disease Biology, Faculty of Science , University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark
                [5 ] departmentDepartment of Biology and Biological Engineering , Chalmers University of Technology , Göteborg, Sweden
                [6 ] departmentThe Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Basic Metabolic Research , University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen, Denmark
                [7 ] departmentDepartment of Biotechnology and Biomedicine , Technical University of Denmark , Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
                [8 ] departmentDepartment of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering , Technical University of Denmark , Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
                [9 ] departmentDepartment of Radiology , Bispebjerg Hospital , Copenhagen, Denmark
                [10 ] departmentDepartment of Biomedical Sciences , University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen, Denmark
                [11 ] departmentResearch Unit and Department of Gastroenterology , Herlev and Gentofte Hospital , Copenhagen, Denmark
                [12 ] Research Centre for Prevention and Health , Copenhagen, Denmark
                [13 ] departmentDepartment of Clinical Experimental Research , Rigshospitalet , Copenhagen, Denmark
                [14 ] departmentDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences , University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen, Denmark
                [15 ] departmentDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences , University of Copenhagen , Frederiksberg, Denmark
                [16 ] departmentSchool of Biological Sciences , The University of Auckland , Auckland, New Zealand
                [17 ] departmentLaboratory of Genomics and Molecular Biomedicine, Department of Biology , University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen, Denmark
                [18 ] Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen , Gentofte, Denmark
                [19 ] departmentBiostatistics, Department of Public Health , University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen, Denmark
                [20 ] Clinical-Microbiomics A/S , Copenhagen, Denmark
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Associate Professor Ramneek Gupta, Department of Bio and Heath Informatics, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs Lyngby, Denmark; ramneek@ 123456cbs.dtu.dk , Associate Professor Lotte Lauritzen, Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, 1958 Frederiksberg, Denmark; ll@ 123456nexs.ku.dk and Professor Tine Rask Licht, National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs Lyngby, Denmark; trli@ 123456food.dtu.dk
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2504-8313
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0065-8174
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4999-1218
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6549-0547
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9585-0141
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7184-5949
                Article
                gutjnl-2017-314786
                10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314786
                6839833
                29097438
                b40499ef-6999-4723-8301-8aa2984c3435
                © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2019. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

                History
                : 03 July 2017
                : 11 October 2017
                : 12 October 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: Innovation Fund Denmark;
                Categories
                Gut Microbiota
                1506
                2312
                Original article
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Gastroenterology & Hepatology
                colonic microflora,diet,immune response,inflammation,obesity
                Gastroenterology & Hepatology
                colonic microflora, diet, immune response, inflammation, obesity

                Comments

                Comment on this article