14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Assessing distinct patterns of cognitive aging using tissue-specific brain age prediction based on diffusion tensor imaging and brain morphometry

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Multimodal imaging enables sensitive measures of the architecture and integrity of the human brain, but the high-dimensional nature of advanced brain imaging features poses inherent challenges for the analyses and interpretations. Multivariate age prediction reduces the dimensionality to one biologically informative summary measure with potential for assessing deviations from normal lifespan trajectories. A number of studies documented remarkably accurate age prediction, but the differential age trajectories and the cognitive sensitivity of distinct brain tissue classes have yet to be adequately characterized. Exploring differential brain age models driven by tissue-specific classifiers provides a hitherto unexplored opportunity to disentangle independent sources of heterogeneity in brain biology. We trained machine-learning models to estimate brain age using various combinations of FreeSurfer based morphometry and diffusion tensor imaging based indices of white matter microstructure in 612 healthy controls aged 18–87 years. To compare the tissue-specific brain ages and their cognitive sensitivity, we applied each of the 11 models in an independent and cognitively well-characterized sample ( n = 265, 20–88 years). Correlations between true and estimated age and mean absolute error (MAE) in our test sample were highest for the most comprehensive brain morphometry ( r = 0.83, CI:0.78–0.86, MAE = 6.76 years) and white matter microstructure ( r = 0.79, CI:0.74–0.83, MAE = 7.28 years) models, confirming sensitivity and generalizability. The deviance from the chronological age were sensitive to performance on several cognitive tests for various models, including spatial Stroop and symbol coding, indicating poorer performance in individuals with an over-estimated age. Tissue-specific brain age models provide sensitive measures of brain integrity, with implications for the study of a range of brain disorders.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Normal cognitive aging.

            Even those who do not experience dementia or mild cognitive impairment may experience subtle cognitive changes associated with aging. Normal cognitive changes can affect an older adult's everyday function and quality of life, and a better understanding of this process may help clinicians distinguish normal from disease states. This article describes the neurocognitive changes observed in normal aging, followed by a description of the structural and functional alterations seen in aging brains. Practical implications of normal cognitive aging are then discussed, followed by a discussion of what is known about factors that may mitigate age-associated cognitive decline.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A theory of visual attention.

              A unified theory of visual recognition and attentional selection is developed by integrating the biased-choice model for single-stimulus recognition (Luce, 1963; Shepard, 1957) with a choice model for selection from multielement displays (Bundesen, Pedersen, & Larsen, 1984) in a race model framework. Mathematically, the theory is tractable, and it specifies the computations necessary for selection. The theory is applied to extant findings from a broad range of experimental paradigms. The findings include effects of object integrality in selective report, number and spatial position of targets in divided-attention paradigms, selection criterion and number of distracters in focused-attention paradigms, delay of selection cue in partial report, and consistent practice in search. On the whole, the quantitative fits are encouraging.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                PeerJ
                PeerJ
                peerj
                peerj
                PeerJ
                PeerJ Inc. (San Diego, USA )
                2167-8359
                30 November 2018
                2018
                : 6
                : e5908
                Affiliations
                [1 ]NORMENT, KG Jebsen Centre for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital & Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo , Oslo, Norway
                [2 ]Department of Psychology, University of Oslo , Oslo, Norway
                [3 ]Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital HT , Nesodden, Norway
                [4 ]Center for Visual Cognition, Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen, Denmark
                Article
                5908
                10.7717/peerj.5908
                6276592
                30533290
                b58d768c-9323-42cc-9007-1bc9a13c371e
                ©2018 Richard et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.

                History
                : 11 July 2018
                : 10 October 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: Norwegian ExtraFoundation for Health and Rehabilitation
                Award ID: 2015/FO5146
                Funded by: Research Council of Norway
                Award ID: 249795
                Award ID: 248238
                Funded by: South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority
                Award ID: 2014097
                Award ID: 2015044
                Award ID: 2015073
                Funded by: Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital
                Funded by: Department of Psychology, University of Oslo
                This study was supported by the Norwegian ExtraFoundation for Health and Rehabilitation (2015/FO5146), the Research Council of Norway (249795, 248238), the South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority (2014097, 2015044, 2015073), Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, and the Department of Psychology, University of Oslo. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Neuroscience
                Psychiatry and Psychology
                Radiology and Medical Imaging
                Data Science

                machine learning,brain age,gray matter,white matter,dti,t1
                machine learning, brain age, gray matter, white matter, dti, t1

                Comments

                Comment on this article