1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Worse outcome and distinct mutational pattern in follicular lymphoma with anti-HBc positivity

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          • Patients with FL anti-HBc + present with worse 10-year PFS and OS.

          • Patients with anti-HBc + present with a higher frequency of ARID1A mutations and lack of EP300 mutations.

          Abstract

          Epidemiological studies have demonstrated the association between hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and B-cell non–Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), mainly for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and follicular lymphoma (FL). We studied a cohort of 121 patients with FL for HBV infection status, clinical features, and gene mutational profile. Anti-HBc was detectable in 16 patients (13.2%), although all had undetectable HBV DNA. Anti-HBcore + (anti-HBc +) cases presented with older age at diagnosis than anti-HBc cases (68.1 vs 57.2 years; P = .007) and higher β2-microglobulin (56.3% vs 28.9%; P = .04). All patients included in the study fulfilled criteria for treatment and received therapy with rituximab or rituximab-containing chemotherapy. There were no episodes of HBV reactivation or HBV hepatitis during treatment and/or maintenance. Remarkably, anti-HBc + patients had significantly lower 10-year progression-free survival (PFS; 12.9% vs 58.3%; P < .0001) and overall survival (OS; 22.0% vs 86.2%; P < .0001), that remained at multivariate analysis. Gene mutational profiling of all cases showed that anti-HBc + cases had higher incidence of ARID1A mutations and absence of EP300 mutations, 2 key epigenetic regulators in FL. Overall, our study shows that FL patients with resolved HBV infection have a worse outcome independently of other well-known clinical risk factors and a distinct gene mutational profile.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Integrated genomic analysis identifies recurrent mutations and evolution patterns driving the initiation and progression of follicular lymphoma

          Follicular lymphoma (FL) is an incurable malignancy 1 , with transformation to an aggressive subtype being a critical event during disease progression. Here we performed whole genome or exome sequencing on 10 FL-transformed FL pairs, followed by deep sequencing of 28 genes in an extension cohort and report the key events and evolutionary processes governing initiation and transformation. Tumor evolution occurred through either a ‘rich’ or ‘sparse’ ancestral common progenitor clone (CPC). We identified recurrent mutations in linker histones, JAK-STAT signaling, NF-κB signaling and B-cell development genes. Longitudinal analyses revealed chromatin regulators (CREBBP, EZH2 and MLL2) as early driver genes, whilst mutations in EBF1 and regulators of NF-κB signaling (MYD88 and TNFAIP3) were gained at transformation. Collectively, this study provides novel insights into the genetic basis of follicular lymphoma, the clonal dynamics of transformation and suggests that personalizing therapies to target key genetic alterations within the CPC represents an attractive therapeutic strategy.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Integration of gene mutations in risk prognostication for patients receiving first-line immunochemotherapy for follicular lymphoma: a retrospective analysis of a prospective clinical trial and validation in a population-based registry.

            Follicular lymphoma is a clinically and genetically heterogeneous disease, but the prognostic value of somatic mutations has not been systematically assessed. We aimed to improve risk stratification of patients receiving first-line immunochemotherapy by integrating gene mutations into a prognostic model.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Comparison in low-tumor-burden follicular lymphomas between an initial no-treatment policy, prednimustine, or interferon alfa: a randomized study from the Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes Folliculaires. Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte.

              To evaluate prospectively in patients with follicular lymphoma and a low tumor burden three therapeutic options: delay of any treatment until clinically meaningful progression, immediate treatment with an oral alkylating agent, or treatment with a biologic response modifier, interferon alfa-2b. Newly diagnosed follicular lymphoma patients with a low tumor burden (n = 193) were randomly assigned to one of three arms: arm 1, no initial treatment (n = 66); arm 2, prednimustine 200 mg/m2/d for 5 days per month for 18 months (n = 64); or arm 3, interferon alfa 5 MU/d for 3 months then 5 MU three times per week for 15 months (n = 63). Clinical characteristics were similar in the three arms. Overall response rates with prednimustine and interferon alfa were 78% and 70%, respectively. The overall response to therapy, when deferred, was similar at 70%. With a median follow-up duration of 45 months after randomization, the median freedom-from-treatment (FFT) interval was 24 months in arm 1 and the interval of freedom from treatment failure (FFTF) was 40 months in arm 2 and 35 months in arm 3. The median overall survival time was not reached and the overall survival rate at 5 years was 78% in arm 1, 70% in arm 2, and 84% in arm 3. Therefore, deferred treatment does not adversely influence survival at 5 years. Patients who progressed within 1 year had a significantly shorter survival duration (median, 48 months). Delayed treatment is feasible in patients with follicular lymphoma and a low tumor burden. For patients with early progression, more intensive therapy should be considered. For others, because delay of treatment until significant clinical progression does not seem to hamper the prognosis or subsequent response to treatment, the long-term toxicity of alkylating agents can be reduced.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Blood Adv
                Blood Adv
                bloodoa
                Blood Advances
                Blood Advances
                American Society of Hematology (Washington, DC )
                2473-9529
                2473-9537
                11 January 2022
                04 January 2022
                : 6
                : 1
                : 82-86
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Pathology, Hospital del Mar–Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain;
                [2 ]Group of Applied Clinical Research in Hematology, Cancer Research Program-IMIM, Barcelona, Spain;
                [3 ]Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain;
                [4 ]Department of Hematology, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, Barcelona, Spain;
                [5 ]Department of Experimental Science and Health, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain;
                [6 ]Department of Hematology, Hospital Son Espases, Mallorca, Spain;
                [7 ]Department of Pathology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain; and
                [8 ]Department of Hematology, ICO-IJC-Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
                Author notes
                [*]

                B.B. and A.S. contributed equally to this study.

                Requests for data sharing may be submitted to Antonio Salar ( asalar@ 123456parcdesalutmar.cat )

                Correspondence: Antonio Salar, Passeig Marítim 25-29, 08003 Barcelona, Spain; e-mail: ASalar@ 123456parcdesalutmar.cat .
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5853-0843
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0742-0759
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6974-0806
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7168-6538
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6783-7604
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3534-6189
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5236-5085
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5335-2726
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4652-4825
                Article
                2022/ADV2021005316
                10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005316
                8753219
                34649275
                b8f3c329-47f9-4381-8a72-adba7a0c0891
                © 2022 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) , permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.
                History
                : 19 May 2021
                : 22 September 2021
                : 14 October 2021
                Page count
                Pages: 5
                Categories
                2
                24
                Stimulus Report

                Comments

                Comment on this article