11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Cassiosomes are stinging-cell structures in the mucus of the upside-down jellyfish Cassiopea xamachana

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Snorkelers in mangrove forest waters inhabited by the upside-down jellyfish Cassiopea xamachana report discomfort due to a sensation known as stinging water, the cause of which is unknown. Using a combination of histology, microscopy, microfluidics, videography, molecular biology, and mass spectrometry-based proteomics, we describe C. xamachana stinging-cell structures that we term cassiosomes. These structures are released within C. xamachana mucus and are capable of killing prey. Cassiosomes consist of an outer epithelial layer mainly composed of nematocytes surrounding a core filled by endosymbiotic dinoflagellates hosted within amoebocytes and presumptive mesoglea. Furthermore, we report cassiosome structures in four additional jellyfish species in the same taxonomic group as C. xamachana (Class Scyphozoa; Order Rhizostomeae), categorized as either motile (ciliated) or nonmotile types. This inaugural study provides a qualitative assessment of the stinging contents of C. xamachana mucus and implicates mucus containing cassiosomes and free intact nematocytes as the cause of stinging water.

          Abstract

          Cheryl L Ames, Anna Klompen et al. describe cassiosomes, stinging cell structures in the mucus of the upside-down jellyfish Cassiopea xamachana. They show that these motile cell masses consist of an outer epithelial layer largely composed of nematocytes surrounding centralized clusters of endosymbiotic dinoflagellates.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Cnidarians as a Source of New Marine Bioactive Compounds—An Overview of the Last Decade and Future Steps for Bioprospecting

          Marine invertebrates are rich sources of bioactive compounds and their biotechnological potential attracts scientific and economic interest worldwide. Although sponges are the foremost providers of marine bioactive compounds, cnidarians are also being studied with promising results. This diverse group of marine invertebrates includes over 11,000 species, 7500 of them belonging to the class Anthozoa. We present an overview of some of the most promising marine bioactive compounds from a therapeutic point of view isolated from cnidarians in the first decade of the 21st century. Anthozoan orders Alcyonacea and Gorgonacea exhibit by far the highest number of species yielding promising compounds. Antitumor activity has been the major area of interest in the screening of cnidarian compounds, the most promising ones being terpenoids (monoterpenoids, diterpenoids, sesquiterpenoids). We also discuss the future of bioprospecting for new marine bioactive compounds produced by cnidarians.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A guideline to nematocyst nomenclature and classification, and some notes on the systematic value of nematocysts

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              The Rise and Fall of an Evolutionary Innovation: Contrasting Strategies of Venom Evolution in Ancient and Young Animals

              Animal venoms are theorized to evolve under the significant influence of positive Darwinian selection in a chemical arms race scenario, where the evolution of venom resistance in prey and the invention of potent venom in the secreting animal exert reciprocal selection pressures. Venom research to date has mainly focused on evolutionarily younger lineages, such as snakes and cone snails, while mostly neglecting ancient clades (e.g., cnidarians, coleoids, spiders and centipedes). By examining genome, venom-gland transcriptome and sequences from the public repositories, we report the molecular evolutionary regimes of several centipede and spider toxin families, which surprisingly accumulated low-levels of sequence variations, despite their long evolutionary histories. Molecular evolutionary assessment of over 3500 nucleotide sequences from 85 toxin families spanning the breadth of the animal kingdom has unraveled a contrasting evolutionary strategy employed by ancient and evolutionarily young clades. We show that the venoms of ancient lineages remarkably evolve under the heavy constraints of negative selection, while toxin families in lineages that originated relatively recently rapidly diversify under the influence of positive selection. We propose that animal venoms mostly employ a ‘two-speed’ mode of evolution, where the major influence of diversifying selection accompanies the earlier stages of ecological specialization (e.g., diet and range expansion) in the evolutionary history of the species–the period of expansion, resulting in the rapid diversification of the venom arsenal, followed by longer periods of purifying selection that preserve the potent toxin pharmacopeia–the period of purification and fixation. However, species in the period of purification may re-enter the period of expansion upon experiencing a major shift in ecology or environment. Thus, we highlight for the first time the significant roles of purifying and episodic selections in shaping animal venoms.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                ames.cheryl.lynn.a1@tohoku.ac.jp
                gary.vora@nrl.navy.mil
                Journal
                Commun Biol
                Commun Biol
                Communications Biology
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2399-3642
                13 February 2020
                13 February 2020
                2020
                : 3
                : 67
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0591 0193, GRID grid.89170.37, National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, Postdoctoral Research Associate, , US Naval Research Laboratory, ; Washington, DC 20375 USA
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2248 6943, GRID grid.69566.3a, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, , Tohoku University, ; Sendai, 980-8572 Japan
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0000 8716 3312, GRID grid.1214.6, Department of Invertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, , Smithsonian Institution, ; Washington, DC 20560 USA
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2106 0692, GRID grid.266515.3, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, , University of Kansas, ; Lawrence, KS 66049 USA
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8278, GRID grid.21940.3e, Department of Bioengineering, , Rice University, ; Houston, TX 77005 USA
                [6 ]GRID grid.264764.5, Texas A&M University at Galveston, ; Galveston, TX 77553 USA
                [7 ]ISNI 0000 0000 8716 3312, GRID grid.1214.6, National Systematics Laboratory of the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration Fisheries Service, National Museum of Natural History, , Smithsonian Institution, ; Washington, DC 20560 USA
                [8 ]ISNI 0000000419368956, GRID grid.168010.e, Stanford University, ; Stanford, CA 94305-2004 USA
                [9 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9140 3841, GRID grid.422145.4, National Aquarium, ; Baltimore, MD 21202 USA
                [10 ]California State University, Monterey Bay, CA 93955 USA
                [11 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0591 0193, GRID grid.89170.37, Center for Bio/Molecular Science and Engineering, , US Naval Research Laboratory, ; Washington, DC 20375 USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8939-0057
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0378-8425
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3664-9691
                Article
                777
                10.1038/s42003-020-0777-8
                7018847
                32054971
                b9f5f489-fbed-4d9f-82d0-c93fb954e443
                © This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply 2020

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 6 March 2019
                : 8 January 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/100000185, United States Department of Defense | Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA);
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/100000001, National Science Foundation (NSF);
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                animal physiology,cellular imaging,evolutionary developmental biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article