11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Perfect mimicry between Heliconius butterflies is constrained by genetics and development

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Müllerian mimicry strongly exemplifies the power of natural selection. However, the exact measure of such adaptive phenotypic convergence and the possible causes of its imperfection often remain unidentified. Here, we first quantify wing colour pattern differences in the forewing region of 14 co-mimetic colour pattern morphs of the butterfly species Heliconius erato and Heliconius melpomene and measure the extent to which mimicking colour pattern morphs are not perfectly identical. Next, using gene-editing CRISPR/Cas9 KO experiments of the gene WntA, which has been mapped to colour pattern diversity in these butterflies, we explore the exact areas of the wings in which WntA affects colour pattern formation differently in H. erato and H. melpomene. We find that, while the relative size of the forewing pattern is generally nearly identical between co-mimics, the CRISPR/Cas9 KO results highlight divergent boundaries in the wing that prevent the co-mimics from achieving perfect mimicry. We suggest that this mismatch may be explained by divergence in the gene regulatory network that defines wing colour patterning in both species, thus constraining morphological evolution even between closely related species.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Contingency and determinism in evolution: Replaying life’s tape

          Historical processes display some degree of “contingency,” meaning their outcomes are sensitive to seemingly inconsequential events that can fundamentally change the future. Contingency is what makes historical outcomes unpredictable. Unlike many other natural phenomena, evolution is a historical process. Evolutionary change is often driven by the deterministic force of natural selection, but natural selection works upon variation that arises unpredictably through time by random mutation, and even beneficial mutations can be lost by chance through genetic drift. Moreover, evolution has taken place within a planetary environment with a particular history of its own. This tension between determinism and contingency makes evolutionary biology a kind of hybrid between science and history. While philosophers of science examine the nuances of contingency, biologists have performed many empirical studies of evolutionary repeatability and contingency. Here, we review the experimental and comparative evidence from these studies. Replicate populations in evolutionary “replay” experiments often show parallel changes, especially in overall performance, although idiosyncratic outcomes show that the particulars of a lineage’s history can affect which of several evolutionary paths is taken. Comparative biologists have found many notable examples of convergent adaptation to similar conditions, but quantification of how frequently such convergence occurs is difficult. On balance, the evidence indicates that evolution tends to be surprisingly repeatable among closely related lineages, but disparate outcomes become more likely as the footprint of history grows deeper. Ongoing research on the structure of adaptive landscapes is providing additional insight into the interplay of fate and chance in the evolutionary process.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Evolution of Diversity in Warning Color and Mimicry: Polymorphisms, Shifting Balance, and Speciation

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              An epistatic ratchet constrains the direction of glucocorticoid receptor evolution

              The extent to which evolution is reversible has long fascinated biologists. 1–8 Most prior work on the reversibility of morphological and life-history evolution 9–13 has been indecisive, because of uncertainty and bias in the methods used to infer ancestral states for such characters. 14,15 Further, despite theoretical work on the factors that could contribute to irreversibility, 1,8,16 there is scant empirical evidence on its causes, because sufficient understanding of the mechanistic basis for the evolution of new or ancestral phenotypes is seldom available. 3,8,17 By studying the reversibility of evolutionary changes in protein structure and function, these limitations can be overcome. Here we show, using the evolution of hormone specificity in vertebrate glucocorticoid receptors (GRs) as a case-study, that the evolutionary path by which GR acquired its new function soon became inaccessible to reverse exploration. Using ancestral gene reconstruction, protein engineering, and X-ray crystallography, we demonstrate that five subsequent “restrictive” mutations, which optimized GR’s new specificity, also destabilized elements of the protein’s structure that were required to support the ancestral conformation. Unless these ratchet-like epistatic substitutions are restored to their ancestral states, reversing the key function-switching mutations yields a non-functional protein. Reversing the restrictive substitutions first, however, does nothing to enhance the ancestral function. Our findings indicate that even if selection for the ancestral function were imposed, direct reversal would be extremely unlikely, suggesting an important role for historical contingency in protein evolution.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Proc Biol Sci
                Proc. Biol. Sci
                RSPB
                royprsb
                Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
                The Royal Society
                0962-8452
                1471-2954
                29 July 2020
                22 July 2020
                22 July 2020
                : 287
                : 1931
                : 20201267
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico , Rio Piedras, Puerto Rico
                [2 ]Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico , Humacao, Puerto Rico
                [3 ]Department of Mathematics , University of Puerto Rico, Rio Piedras, Puerto Rico
                [4 ]Department of Biological Sciences, Mississippi State University , Mississippi State, MS, USA
                [5 ]Smithsonian Tropical Research Institution , Panama, Republic of Panama
                [6 ]Molecular Sciences and Research Center, University of Puerto Rico , Puerto Rico
                Author notes

                Electronic supplementary material is available online at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5054655.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9399-1007
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2516-1893
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2415-646X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2724-071X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7986-9993
                Article
                rspb20201267
                10.1098/rspb.2020.1267
                7423669
                32693728
                badcbade-f347-4722-ba0e-09ff43892bfa
                © 2020 The Authors.

                Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 2 June 2020
                : 30 June 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: Puerto Rico Science, Technology & Research Trust;
                Award ID: #2020-00142
                Funded by: Directorate for Biological Sciences, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000076;
                Award ID: DBI 1852259
                Funded by: Office of Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100005714;
                Award ID: OIA 1736026
                Funded by: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000104;
                Award ID: NNX15AI11H
                Categories
                1001
                70
                197
                Evolution
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                July 29, 2020

                Life sciences
                mimicry,wnta,developmental constraints,convergence,butterflies
                Life sciences
                mimicry, wnta, developmental constraints, convergence, butterflies

                Comments

                Comment on this article