21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Health Risks and Consequences of a COVID-19 Infection for People with Disabilities: Scoping Review and Descriptive Thematic Analysis

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This study aims to synthesize the literature on any disproportionate health risks or consequences of a COVID-19 infection for people with disabilities. Scoping review with a descriptive thematic analysis was carried out. Up to mid-September 2020, seven scientific databases and three preprint servers were searched to identify empirical or perspective papers. Snowballing searches and expert’ consultations also took place. Two independent reviewers were used for the screenings and data extractions. Of 1027 references, 58 were included, 15 of which were empirical articles. The thematic analysis showed that: (1) People with disabilities living in residential or long-term care facilities were more likely to have greater infection rates; (2) Intersecting mediators of greater infection risks were multiple (e.g., lack of accessible information); (3) People with disabilities often face greater health problems when infected; and (4) Unethical disadvantages in the rationing of lifesaving and critical care can be experienced by people with disabilities. Conclusions: Beyond any health-related vulnerabilities (e.g., comorbidity rates), multiple yet modifiable environmental factors can provide disproportionate health risks and consequences of a COVID-19 infection for people with disabilities. Public health and policy measures must prevent or reduce modifiable environmental risks.

          Related collections

          Most cited references91

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Using thematic analysis in psychology

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation

            Scoping reviews, a type of knowledge synthesis, follow a systematic approach to map evidence on a topic and identify main concepts, theories, sources, and knowledge gaps. Although more scoping reviews are being done, their methodological and reporting quality need improvement. This document presents the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist and explanation. The checklist was developed by a 24-member expert panel and 2 research leads following published guidance from the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network. The final checklist contains 20 essential reporting items and 2 optional items. The authors provide a rationale and an example of good reporting for each item. The intent of the PRISMA-ScR is to help readers (including researchers, publishers, commissioners, policymakers, health care providers, guideline developers, and patients or consumers) develop a greater understanding of relevant terminology, core concepts, and key items to report for scoping reviews.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                ijerph
                International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
                MDPI
                1661-7827
                1660-4601
                20 April 2021
                April 2021
                : 18
                : 8
                : 4348
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI), South Asia Centre for Disability Inclusive Development and Research (SACDIR), Indian Institute of Public Health-Hyderabad (IIPH-H), Hyderabad 500 033, India; Suresh.Kumar@ 123456lshtm.ac.uk
                [2 ]Department of Occupational Therapy, Byrdine F. Lewis College of Nursing and Health Professions, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA; sbhattacharjya@ 123456gsu.edu
                [3 ]Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Service, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA 02130, USA; bogdanov@ 123456bu.edu
                [4 ]Department of Psychiatry, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, USA
                [5 ]Departments of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Oakland University, Rochester, MI 48309-4452, USA; cpapadimitriou@ 123456oakland.edu
                [6 ]IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, 48903 Bilbao, Spain; jcalasprilla@ 123456gmail.com
                [7 ]Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, 48903 Barakaldo, Spain
                [8 ]Department of Cell Biology and Histology, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, 48903 Leioa, Spain
                [9 ]Department of Clinical Psychology, Seattle Pacific University, Seattle, WA 98119, USA; bentley@ 123456spu.edu
                [10 ]Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205-2196, USA
                [11 ]Global Health and Tropical Medicine (GHTM) & WHO Collaborating Centre for Health Workforce Policy and Planning, Institute of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, NOVA University of Lisbon, 1349-008 Lisbon, Portugal
                [12 ]Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Health & Rehabilitation Sciences: Sargent College, Boston University, MA 02215, USA
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: jesus-ts@ 123456outlook.com
                [†]

                Membership of the Refugee Empowerment Task Force, International Networking Group of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine is provided in the Author Contributions.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6970-4952
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1534-9961
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7184-8311
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6240-8122
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1300-6308
                Article
                ijerph-18-04348
                10.3390/ijerph18084348
                8074171
                33923986
                bd0ca911-b0c5-4564-b7c8-ab6446475896
                © 2021 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 01 March 2021
                : 16 April 2021
                Categories
                Review

                Public health
                covid-19,health equity,disabled persons,vulnerable populations,public health
                Public health
                covid-19, health equity, disabled persons, vulnerable populations, public health

                Comments

                Comment on this article