10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The architecture of cell differentiation in choanoflagellates and sponge choanocytes

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Although collar cells are conserved across animals and their closest relatives, the choanoflagellates, little is known about their ancestry, their subcellular architecture, or how they differentiate. The choanoflagellate Salpingoeca rosetta expresses genes necessary for animal development and can alternate between unicellular and multicellular states, making it a powerful model for investigating the origin of animal multicellularity and mechanisms underlying cell differentiation. To compare the subcellular architecture of solitary collar cells in S. rosetta with that of multicellular ‘rosette’ colonies and collar cells in sponges, we reconstructed entire cells in 3D through transmission electron microscopy on serial ultrathin sections. Structural analysis of our 3D reconstructions revealed important differences between single and colonial choanoflagellate cells, with colonial cells exhibiting a more amoeboid morphology consistent with higher levels of macropinocytotic activity. Comparison of multiple reconstructed rosette colonies highlighted the variable nature of cell sizes, cell–cell contact networks, and colony arrangement. Importantly, we uncovered the presence of elongated cells in some rosette colonies that likely represent a distinct and differentiated cell type, pointing toward spatial cell differentiation. Intercellular bridges within choanoflagellate colonies displayed a variety of morphologies and connected some but not all neighbouring cells. Reconstruction of sponge choanocytes revealed ultrastructural commonalities but also differences in major organelle composition in comparison to choanoflagellates. Together, our comparative reconstructions uncover the architecture of cell differentiation in choanoflagellates and sponge choanocytes and constitute an important step in reconstructing the cell biology of the last common ancestor of animals.

          Abstract

          3D electron microscopy of choanoflagellates and sponge choanocytes reveals a remarkable variety of cell architecture and suggests that cell type differentiation may have been present in the stem lineage leading to the animals.

          Author summary

          Choanoflagellates are microscopic aquatic organisms that can alternate between single-celled and multicellular states, and sequencing of their genomes has revealed that choanoflagellates are the closest single-celled relatives of animals. Moreover, choanoflagellates are a form of ‘collar cell’—a cell type crowned by an array of finger-like microvilli and a single, whip-like flagellum. This cell type is also found throughout the animal kingdom; therefore, studying the structure of the choanoflagellate collar cell can shed light on how this cell type and animal multicellularity might have evolved. We used electron microscopy to reconstruct in 3D the total subcellular composition of single-celled and multicellular choanoflagellates as well as the collar cells from a marine sponge, which represents an early-branching animal lineage. We found differences between single-celled and multicellular choanoflagellates in structures associated with cellular energetics, membrane trafficking, and cell morphology. Likewise, we describe a complex system of cell–cell connections associated with multicellular choanoflagellates. Finally, comparison of choanoflagellates and sponge collar cells revealed subcellular differences associated with feeding and cellular energetics. Taken together, this study is an important step forward in reconstructing the biology of the last common ancestor of the animals.

          Related collections

          Most cited references56

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Exosome secretion: molecular mechanisms and roles in immune responses.

          Exosomes are small membrane vesicles, secreted by most cell types from multivesicular endosomes, and thought to play important roles in intercellular communications. Initially described in 1983, as specifically secreted by reticulocytes, exosomes became of interest for immunologists in 1996, when they were proposed to play a role in antigen presentation. More recently, the finding that exosomes carry genetic materials, mRNA and miRNA, has been a major breakthrough in the field, unveiling their capacity to vehicle genetic messages. It is now clear that not only immune cells but probably all cell types are able to secrete exosomes: their range of possible functions expands well beyond immunology to neurobiology, stem cell and tumor biology, and their use in clinical applications as biomarkers or as therapeutic tools is an extensive area of research. Despite intensive efforts to understand their functions, two issues remain to be solved in the future: (i) what are the physiological function(s) of exosomes in vivo and (ii) what are the relative contributions of exosomes and of other secreted membrane vesicles in these proposed functions? Here, we will focus on the current ideas on exosomes and immune responses, but also on their mechanisms of secretion and the use of this knowledge to elucidate the latter issue. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Energy substrate modulates mitochondrial structure and oxidative capacity in cancer cells.

            Comparative analysis of cytoplasmic organelles in a variety of tumors relative to normal tissues generally reveals a strong diminution in mitochondrial content and in oxidative phosphorylation capacity. However, little is known about what triggers these modifications and whether or not they are physiologically reversible. We hypothesized that energy substrate availability could play an important role in this phenomenon. The physiological effects of a change in substrate availability were examined on a human cancer cell line (HeLa), focusing specifically on its ability to use glycolysis versus oxidative phosphorylation, and the effect that energy substrate type has on mitochondrial composition, structure, and function. Changes in oxidative phosphorylation were measured in vivo by a variety of techniques, including the use of two novel ratiometric green fluorescent protein biosensors, the expression level of oxidative phosphorylation and some glycolytic enzymes were determined by Western blot, mitochondrial DNA content was measured by real-time PCR, and mitochondrial morphology was monitored by both confocal and electron microscopy. Our data show that the defective mitochondrial system described in cancer cells can be dramatically improved by solely changing substrate availability and that HeLa cells can adapt their mitochondrial network structurally and functionally to derive energy by glutaminolysis only. This could also provide an explanation for the enhancement of oxidative phosphorylation capacity observed after tumor regression or removal. Our work demonstrates that the pleomorphic, highly dynamic structure of the mitochondrion can be remodeled to accommodate a change in oxidative phosphorylation activity. We compared our finding on HeLa cells with those for nontransformed fibroblasts to help distinguish the regulatory pathways.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              New mechanism for Notch signaling to endothelium at a distance by Delta-like 4 incorporation into exosomes.

              Notch signaling is an evolutionary conserved pathway that is mediated by cell-cell contact. It is involved in a variety of developmental processes and has an essential role in vascular development and angiogenesis. Delta-like 4 (Dll4) is a Notch ligand that is up-regulated during angiogenesis. It is expressed in endothelial cells and regulates the differentiation between tip cells and stalk cells of neovasculature. Here, we present evidence that Dll4 is incorporated into endothelial exosomes. It can also be incorporated into the exosomes of tumor cells that overexpress Dll4. These exosomes can transfer the Dll4 protein to other endothelial cells and incorporate it into their cell membrane, which results in an inhibition of Notch signaling and a loss of Notch receptor. Transfer of Dll4 was also shown in vivo from tumor cells to host endothelium. Addition of Dll4 exosomes confers a tip cell phenotype on the endothelial cell, which results in a high Dll4/Notch-receptor ratio, low Notch signaling, and filopodia formation. This was further evidenced by increased branching in a tube-formation assay and in vivo. This reversal in phenotype appears to enhance vessel formation and is a new form of signaling for Notch ligands that expands their signaling potential beyond cell-cell contact.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Funding acquisitionRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                PLoS Biol
                PLoS Biol
                plos
                plosbiol
                PLoS Biology
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1544-9173
                1545-7885
                12 April 2019
                April 2019
                12 April 2019
                : 17
                : 4
                : e3000226
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, The Laboratory, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, United Kingdom
                [2 ] Plymouth University, Drake Circus, Plymouth, United Kingdom
                [3 ] Biophysics Graduate Group, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America
                [4 ] Electron Microscope Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America
                [5 ] Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, United States of America
                [6 ] Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America
                [7 ] Sars International Centre for Molecular Marine Biology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
                University of Vienna, AUSTRIA
                Author notes

                The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                [¤]

                Current address: University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3374-3479
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6409-1111
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9826-057X
                Article
                PBIOLOGY-D-18-01101
                10.1371/journal.pbio.3000226
                6481868
                30978201
                c50a6338-0e42-4223-9ae1-0f49563c6e2e
                © 2019 Laundon et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 1 November 2018
                : 27 March 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 0, Pages: 22
                Funding
                Funded by: National Science Foundation (US)
                Award ID: DGE 1106400
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Royal Society (GB)
                Award ID: UF160677
                Award Recipient :
                This work was supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (DGE 1106400) awarded to BTL, the Anne Warner endowed Fellowship through the Marine Biological Association of the UK awarded to PB, the Royal Society University Research Fellowship awarded to PB and the Sars core budget. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Short Reports
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Cell Biology
                Cellular Structures and Organelles
                Vesicles
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Cell Biology
                Cellular Structures and Organelles
                Vacuoles
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Cell Biology
                Cellular Structures and Organelles
                Endoplasmic Reticulum
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Cell Biology
                Cell Processes
                Secretory Pathway
                Endoplasmic Reticulum
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Developmental Biology
                Cell Differentiation
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Eukaryota
                Animals
                Invertebrates
                Sponges
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Biochemistry
                Bioenergetics
                Energy-Producing Organelles
                Mitochondria
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Cell Biology
                Cellular Structures and Organelles
                Energy-Producing Organelles
                Mitochondria
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Cell Biology
                Cellular Structures and Organelles
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Cell Biology
                Cellular Structures and Organelles
                Flagella
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
                Pathogens
                Virulence Factors
                Pathogen Motility
                Flagella
                Custom metadata
                vor-update-to-uncorrected-proof
                2019-04-24
                All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files. All TrakEM2 project files and electron microscopy files are available from figshare ( doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7346750.v2).

                Life sciences
                Life sciences

                Comments

                Comment on this article