24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Trait‐based approaches to analyze links between the drivers of change and ecosystem services: Synthesizing existing evidence and future challenges

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Understanding the responses of biodiversity to drivers of change and the effects of biodiversity on ecosystem properties and ecosystem services is a key challenge in the context of global environmental change. We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis of the scientific literature linking direct drivers of change and ecosystem services via functional traits of three taxonomic groups (vegetation, invertebrates, and vertebrates) to: (1) uncover trends and research biases in this field; and (2) synthesize existing empirical evidence. Our results show the existence of important biases in published studies related to ecosystem types, taxonomic groups, direct drivers of change, ecosystem services, geographical range, and the spatial scale of analysis. We found multiple evidence of links between drivers and services mediated by functional traits, particularly between land‐use changes and regulating services in vegetation and invertebrates. Seventy‐five functional traits were recorded in our sample. However, few of these functional traits were repeatedly found to be associated with both the species responses to direct drivers of change (response traits) and the species effects on the provision of ecosystem services (effect traits). Our results highlight the existence of potential “key functional traits,” understood as those that have the capacity to influence the provision of multiple ecosystem services, while responding to specific drivers of change, across a variety of systems and organisms. Identifying “key functional traits” would help to develop robust indicator systems to monitor changes in biodiversity and their effects on ecosystem functioning and ecosystem services supply.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services.

          Concern is growing about the consequences of biodiversity loss for ecosystem functioning, for the provision of ecosystem services, and for human well being. Experimental evidence for a relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem process rates is compelling, but the issue remains contentious. Here, we present the first rigorous quantitative assessment of this relationship through meta-analysis of experimental work spanning 50 years to June 2004. We analysed 446 measures of biodiversity effects (252 in grasslands), 319 of which involved primary producer manipulations or measurements. Our analyses show that: biodiversity effects are weaker if biodiversity manipulations are less well controlled; effects of biodiversity change on processes are weaker at the ecosystem compared with the community level and are negative at the population level; productivity-related effects decline with increasing number of trophic links between those elements manipulated and those measured; biodiversity effects on stability measures ('insurance' effects) are not stronger than biodiversity effects on performance measures. For those ecosystem services which could be assessed here, there is clear evidence that biodiversity has positive effects on most. Whilst such patterns should be further confirmed, a precautionary approach to biodiversity management would seem prudent in the meantime.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            High plant diversity is needed to maintain ecosystem services.

            Biodiversity is rapidly declining worldwide, and there is consensus that this can decrease ecosystem functioning and services. It remains unclear, though, whether few or many of the species in an ecosystem are needed to sustain the provisioning of ecosystem services. It has been hypothesized that most species would promote ecosystem services if many times, places, functions and environmental changes were considered; however, no previous study has considered all of these factors together. Here we show that 84% of the 147 grassland plant species studied in 17 biodiversity experiments promoted ecosystem functioning at least once. Different species promoted ecosystem functioning during different years, at different places, for different functions and under different environmental change scenarios. Furthermore, the species needed to provide one function during multiple years were not the same as those needed to provide multiple functions within one year. Our results indicate that even more species will be needed to maintain ecosystem functioning and services than previously suggested by studies that have either (1) considered only the number of species needed to promote one function under one set of environmental conditions, or (2) separately considered the importance of biodiversity for providing ecosystem functioning across multiple years, places, functions or environmental change scenarios. Therefore, although species may appear functionally redundant when one function is considered under one set of environmental conditions, many species are needed to maintain multiple functions at multiple times and places in a changing world.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              Biodiversity and Resilience of Ecosystem Functions.

              Accelerating rates of environmental change and the continued loss of global biodiversity threaten functions and services delivered by ecosystems. Much ecosystem monitoring and management is focused on the provision of ecosystem functions and services under current environmental conditions, yet this could lead to inappropriate management guidance and undervaluation of the importance of biodiversity. The maintenance of ecosystem functions and services under substantial predicted future environmental change (i.e., their 'resilience') is crucial. Here we identify a range of mechanisms underpinning the resilience of ecosystem functions across three ecological scales. Although potentially less important in the short term, biodiversity, encompassing variation from within species to across landscapes, may be crucial for the longer-term resilience of ecosystem functions and the services that they underpin.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                violeta.hevia@uam.es
                Journal
                Ecol Evol
                Ecol Evol
                10.1002/(ISSN)2045-7758
                ECE3
                Ecology and Evolution
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2045-7758
                04 January 2017
                February 2017
                : 7
                : 3 ( doiID: 10.1002/ece3.2017.7.issue-3 )
                : 831-844
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Social‐ecological Systems Laboratory Department of EcologyUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid MadridSpain
                [ 2 ] Faculty of Sustainability Institute of Ethics and Transdisciplinary Sustainability ResearchLeuphana University of Lüneburg LüneburgGermany
                [ 3 ] Applied Research and Agricultural Extension DepartmentMadrid Institute for Rural, Agricultural and Food Research and Development (IMIDRA) Alcalá De Henares MadridSpain
                [ 4 ] Institute of BotanyAcademy of Sciences of the Czech Republic TrebonCzech Republic
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Violeta Hevia, Social‐ecological Systems Laboratory, Department of Ecology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

                Email: violeta.hevia@ 123456uam.es

                Article
                ECE32692
                10.1002/ece3.2692
                5288245
                28168020
                c83cf94d-6f1c-4967-ac05-e0cf94cfdc6e
                © 2017 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 21 September 2016
                : 15 November 2016
                : 27 November 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 1, Pages: 14, Words: 9407
                Funding
                Funded by: Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness
                Award ID: CGL2014‐53782‐P
                Funded by: Spanish National Institute for Agriculture and Food Research and Technology (INIA)
                Funded by: European Social Fund
                Categories
                Review
                Review
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                ece32692
                February 2017
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:5.0.4 mode:remove_FC converted:01.02.2017

                Evolutionary Biology
                biodiversity,ecosystem function,effect traits,global environmental change,response traits,systematic review

                Comments

                Comment on this article