Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Problem- and Case-Based Learning in Science: An Introduction to Distinctions, Values, and Outcomes

      research-article
      CBE Life Sciences Education
      American Society for Cell Biology

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Problem-based learning and case-based learning embrace a wide range of overlapping but independent instructional strategies. Being aware of the variants, their values and learning outcomes allows informed and effective instructional design.

          Abstract

          Case-based learning and problem-based learning have demonstrated great promise in reforming science education. Yet an instructor, in newly considering this suite of interrelated pedagogical strategies, faces a number of important instructional choices. Different features and their related values and learning outcomes are profiled here, including: the level of student autonomy; instructional focus on content, skills development, or nature-of-science understanding; the role of history, or known outcomes; scope, clarity, and authenticity of problems provided to students; extent of collaboration; complexity, in terms of number of interpretive perspectives; and, perhaps most importantly, the role of applying versus generating knowledge.

          Related collections

          Most cited references102

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn?

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction.

            The author's thesis is that there is sufficient research evidence to make any reasonable person skeptical about the benefits of discovery learning--practiced under the guise of cognitive constructivism or social constructivism--as a preferred instructional method. The author reviews research on discovery of problem-solving rules culminating in the 1960s, discovery of conservation strategies culminating in the 1970s, and discovery of LOGO programming strategies culminating in the 1980s. In each case, guided discovery was more effective than pure discovery in helping students learn and transfer. Overall, the constructivist view of learning may be best supported by methods of instruction that involve cognitive activity rather than behavioral activity, instructional guidance rather than pure discovery, and curricular focus rather than unstructured exploration. ((c) 2004 APA, all rights reserved)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Monitoring Editor
                Journal
                CBE Life Sci Educ
                CBE-LSE
                CBE-LSE
                CBE-LSE
                CBE Life Sciences Education
                American Society for Cell Biology
                1931-7913
                1931-7913
                Fall 2013
                : 12
                : 3
                : 364-372
                Affiliations
                SHiPS Resource Center, Saint Paul, MN 55104
                Author notes
                Address correspondence to: Douglas Allchin ( allch001@ 123456umn.edu ).
                Article
                CBE-12-11-0190
                10.1187/cbe.12-11-0190
                3763004
                24006385
                ccfe18fe-5e21-41f0-bb9e-1a264cb61606
                © 2013 D. Allchin. CBE—Life Sciences Education © 2013 The American Society for Cell Biology. This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). It is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0).

                “ASCB®” and “The American Society for Cell Biology®” are registered trademarks of The American Society of Cell Biology.

                History
                : 9 November 2012
                : 21 April 2013
                : 15 May 2013
                Categories
                Essays
                Custom metadata
                September 4, 2013

                Education
                Education

                Comments

                Comment on this article