27
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Erratum to: Particulate matters from diesel heavy duty trucks exhaust versus cigarettes emissions: a new educational antismoking instrument

      correction

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          After publication of the original article [1] it was brought to our attention that the graph in figure two (here referred to as Fig. 1) contained an error in the intertitles. The corrected graph has been included in this erratum as Fig. 1. Please note that this error does not affect any conclusions drawn in the original article. Fig. 1 Real time graph of the PM1, PM2.5 and PM10 records of test truck 2

          Related collections

          Most cited references1

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Particulate matters from diesel heavy duty trucks exhaust versus cigarettes emissions: a new educational antismoking instrument

          Background Indoor smoking in public places and workplaces is forbidden in Italy since 2003, but some health concerns are arising from outdoor secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure for non-smokers. One of the biggest Italian Steel Manufacturer, with several factories in Italy and abroad, the Marcegaglia Group, recently introduced the outdoor smoking ban within the perimeter of all their factories. In order to encourage their smoker employees to quit, the Marcegaglia management decided to set up an educational framework by measuring the PM1, PM2.5 and PM10 emissions from heavy duty trucks and to compare them with the emissions of cigarettes in an indoor controlled environment under the same conditions. Methods The exhaust pipe of two trucks powered by a diesel engine of about 13.000/14.000 cc3 were connected with a flexible hose to a hole in the window of a container of 36 m3 volume used as field office. The trucks operated idling for 8 min and then, after adequate office ventilation, a smoker smoked a cigarette. Particulate matter emission was thereafter analyzed. Results Cigarette pollution was much higher than the heavy duty truck one. Mean of the two tests was: PM1 truck 125.0(47.0), cigarettes 231.7(90.9) p = 0.002; PM2.5 truck 250.8(98.7), cigarettes 591.8(306.1) p = 0.006; PM10 truck 255.8(52.4), cigarettes 624.0(321.6) p = 0.002. Conclusions Our findings may be important for policies that aim reducing outdoor SHS exposure. They may also help smokers to quit tobacco dependence by giving them an educational perspective that rebuts the common alibi that traffic pollution is more dangerous than cigarettes pollution.
            Bookmark

            Author and article information

            Contributors
            cinzia.demarco@istitutotumori.mi.it
            Journal
            Multidiscip Respir Med
            Multidiscip Respir Med
            Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine
            BioMed Central (London )
            1828-695X
            2049-6958
            16 February 2016
            16 February 2016
            2016
            : 11
            : 11
            Affiliations
            [ ]Tobacco Control Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
            [ ]Patient Information Service, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
            Article
            48
            10.1186/s40248-016-0048-1
            4754891
            26885365
            cffdddea-637a-489d-ab74-825907adabf2
            © De Marco et al. 2016

            Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

            History
            : 2 February 2016
            : 2 February 2016
            Categories
            Erratum
            Custom metadata
            © The Author(s) 2016

            Respiratory medicine
            Respiratory medicine

            Comments

            Comment on this article