11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Sedating ventilated COVID-19 patients with inhalational anesthetic drugs

      discussion
      a , b , c , * , b , d
      EBioMedicine
      Elsevier

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Most patients with COVID-19 exhibit mild to moderate respiratory symptoms; however, some develop severe pneumonia and hypoxemia is a frequent cause of death. Severely ill COVID-19 patients often require endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. The choice of drugs to sedate these patients differs widely depending on drug availability and clinical expertise. We suggest that care providers with the appropriate clinical expertise, consider the use of inhalational anesthetic drugs, such as sevoflurane and isoflurane for the following reasons. Intensivists and anesthesiologists are teaming up to treat the sickest COVID-19 patients. They have reported that ventilated COVID-19 patients often require high doses of intravenous sedative drugs such as propofol, midazolam, ketamine and dexmedetomidine. Not surprisingly, there is a growing shortage of these drugs. Also, studies of patients with severe lung injury from causes other than COVID-19 have shown that inhalational anesthetic drugs improve oxygenation and lower mortality when compared with propofol or midazolam [1]. The severity of lung injury in COVID-19 patients correlates with levels of cytokines and viral load. Convincing preclinical data from others and us have shown that inhalational anesthetic drugs attenuate lung inflammation and dilate airways [2,3]. These effects are mediated by γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptors, which are expressed in different types of cells in the lung. Stimulating GABAA receptors in lung epithelial cells reduces the production of proinflammatory cytokines; whereas activating GABAA receptors in airway smooth muscle cells stimulates bronchodilation and improves oxygenation [2,3]. The use of inhalational anesthetic drugs for ventilated COVID-19 patients is both practical and cost effective in low- and high-income countries. These drugs allow sedation levels to be closely and rapidly controlled [4]; and drug administration does not require electronic infusion pumps, which are in short supply. Conventionally, anesthetic drug delivery units and gas scavenging systems that reduce atmospheric pollution are not available in most critical care units. However, operating rooms which contain the equipment, are being converted into critical care units and anesthetic gas machines are being used as ICU ventilators during the surge of COVID-19 cases [5]. In non-operating room settings, less conventional devices including the AnaConDa system can be used to administer the drugs. Care providers must exercise caution and consult with anesthesiologists when treating COVID-19 patients with inhalational anesthetics because of the adverse effects of the drugs [4]. They are contraindicated in patients with malignant hyperthermia and can cause cardiovascular instability and respiratory depression [4]. Whether long-term adverse effects result from prolonged drug treatment remains unknown. Finally, to mitigate adverse effects, the Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation (APSF) has developed guidelines for sedating COVID-19 patients with inhalational anesthetic drugs and recommendations for repurposing anesthetic gas machines as ICU ventilators [5]. Clinical trials of COVID-19 patients are under development in Canada and elsewhere; however, until definitive data are available, care providers should consider the use of inhalational anesthetic drugs. These drugs reduce inflammation, dilate airways, and improve oxygenation and thus, may improve patient outcome. Author contributions B.A.O., D.S.W. and W.Y.L. wrote the letter. Declaration of Competing Interest B.A.O. is an inventor named on a Canadian patent (2852978), a US patent (9517265), and a pending US patent (62/268,137). D.S.W. and W.Y.L have no competing interests.

          Related collections

          Most cited references4

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Sevoflurane for Sedation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study

          Sevoflurane improves gas exchange, and reduces alveolar edema and inflammation in preclinical studies of lung injury, but its therapeutic effects have never been investigated in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Volatile Anesthetics. Is a New Player Emerging in Critical Care Sedation?

            Volatile anesthetic agent use in the intensive care unit, aided by technological advances, has become more accessible to critical care physicians. With increasing concern over adverse patient consequences associated with our current sedation practice, there is growing interest to find non-benzodiazepine-based alternative sedatives. Research has demonstrated that volatile-based sedation may provide superior awakening and extubation times in comparison with current intravenous sedation agents (propofol and benzodiazepines). Volatile agents may possess important end-organ protective properties mediated via cytoprotective and antiinflammatory mechanisms. However, like all sedatives, volatile agents are capable of deeply sedating patients, which can have respiratory depressant effects and reduce patient mobility. This review seeks to critically appraise current volatile use in critical care medicine including current research, technical consideration of their use, contraindications, areas of controversy, and proposed future research topics.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Effects of anesthetic regimes on inflammatory responses in a rat model of acute lung injury.

              Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is the major inhibitory neurotransmitter through activation of GABA receptors. Volatile anesthetics activate type-A (GABA(A)) receptors resulting in inhibition of synaptic transmission. Lung epithelial cells have been recently found to express GABA(A) receptors that exert anti-inflammatory properties. We hypothesized that the volatile anesthetic sevoflurane (SEVO) attenuates lung inflammation through activation of lung epithelial GABA(A) receptors. Sprague-Dawley rats were anesthetized with SEVO or ketamine/xylazine (KX). Acute lung inflammation was induced by intratracheal instillation of endotoxin, followed by mechanical ventilation for 4 h at a tidal volume of 15 mL/kg without positive end-expiratory pressure (two-hit lung injury model). To examine the specific effects of GABA, healthy human lung epithelial cells (BEAS-2B) were challenged with endotoxin in the presence and absence of GABA with and without addition of the GABA(A) receptor antagonist picrotoxin. Anesthesia with SEVO improved oxygenation and reduced pulmonary cytokine responses compared to KX. This phenomenon was associated with increased expression of the π subunit of GABA(A) receptors and glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD). The endotoxin-induced cytokine release from BEAS-2B cells was attenuated by the treatment with GABA, which was reversed by the administration of picrotoxin. Anesthesia with SEVO suppresses pulmonary inflammation and thus protects the lung from the two-hit injury. The anti-inflammatory effect of SEVO is likely due to activation of pulmonary GABA(A) signaling pathways.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                EBioMedicine
                EBioMedicine
                EBioMedicine
                Elsevier
                2352-3964
                21 April 2020
                May 2020
                21 April 2020
                : 55
                : 102770
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1E2, Canada
                [b ]Department of Physiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada
                [c ]Department of Anesthesia, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada
                [d ]Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 5C1, Canada
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1E2, Canada. beverley.orser@ 123456utoronto.ca
                Article
                S2352-3964(20)30145-6 102770
                10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102770
                7186492
                32344199
                d125ff7e-8043-48a2-91e5-a72c365b379c
                © 2020 The Author(s)

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 6 April 2020
                : 14 April 2020
                Categories
                Letter

                Comments

                Comment on this article