0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Students’ approaches to learning (SALs): Validation and psychometric properties of a tool measurement

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          BACKGROUND:

          Deep learning is an important outcome of the higher education and is mostly determined by students’ approaches to learning (SALs). The latest version of the Study Process Questionnaire (SPQ) is one of the most used instruments assessing SALs. Many studies from various contexts have either validated or used this famous tool. But none of them—to the best of our knowledge—stem from the Moroccan tertiary context. The current study fills this gap by first: Getting a local translation of the questionnaire following the standardized methodological process and secondly to update the validity and psychometric properties of the construct.

          MATERIALS AND METHODS:

          Arabic back translation was performed. Data were collected among tertiary scientific students. Descriptive statistics, Cronbach's coefficient alpha, and confirmatory factor analysis were carried out under SPSS version 22.

          RESULTS:

          A strong fit of the dichotomic construct (deep and surface) was found, whereas the hierarchical models were disappointing.

          CONCLUSIONS:

          Following the standards of the psychometrics’ validation, this Arabic version could be used only in first-order factor model to evaluate the deep and surface approach within tertiary education in Moroccan context.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline.

          The diversity of the population worldwide suggests a great need for cross-culturally validated research instruments or scales. Researchers and clinicians must have access to reliable and valid measures of concepts of interest in their own cultures and languages to conduct cross-cultural research and/or provide quality patient care. Although there are well-established methodological approaches for translating, adapting and validating instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research, a great variation in the use of these approaches continues to prevail in the health care literature. Therefore, the objectives of this scholarly paper were to review published recommendations of cross-cultural validation of instruments and scales, and to propose and present a clear and user-friendly guideline for the translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for cross-cultural health care research. A review of highly recommended methodological approaches to translation, adaptation and cross-cultural validation of research instruments or scales was performed. Recommendations were summarized and incorporated into a seven-step guideline. Each one of the steps was described and key points were highlighted. Example of a project using the proposed steps of the guideline was fully described. Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for cross-cultural research is very time-consuming and requires careful planning and the adoption of rigorous methodological approaches to derive a reliable and valid measure of the concept of interest in the target population. © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Instrument translation process: a methods review.

            Cross-cultural and international collaborative studies are needed in nursing research. Therefore, it is necessary to translate research instruments into the language of the culture being studied. In this methods review, different processes of instrument translation and evaluation of translation adequacy in published nursing research are described and classified into a hierarchy. Studies including translation of quantitative research instruments were reviewed. Forty-seven studies were included. These were classified into six categories. Studies were classified into categories as follows: forward-only translation (2), forward-only translation with testing (7), back-translation (13), back-translation with monolingual test (18), back-translation with bilingual test (3), and back-translation with both monolingual and bilingual test (4). Strengths and weaknesses are analysed. The studies reviewed used diverse methods of varying quality. There is need for consensus among researchers in how to achieve quality of instrument translation in cross-cultural research. Researchers should carefully attend to achieving and reporting evidence of the accuracy and validity of instrument translation. When back-translation fails to achieve semantic equivalence, the instrument development process should be replicated in the target language.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F.

              To produce a revised two-factor version of the Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) suitable for use by teachers in evaluating the learning approaches of their students. The revised instrument assesses deep and surface approaches only, using fewer items. A set of 43 items was drawn up for the initial tests. These were derived from: the original version of the SPQ, modified items from the SPQ, and new items. A process of testing and refinement eventuated in deep and surface motive and strategy scales each with 5 items, 10 items per approach score. The final version was tested using reliability procedures and confirmatory factor analysis. The sample for the testing and refinement process consisted of 229 students from the health sciences faculty of a university in Hong Kong. A fresh sample of 495 undergraduate students from a variety of departments of the same university was used for the test of the final version. The final version of the questionnaire had acceptable Cronbach alpha values for scale reliability. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated a good fit to the intended two-factor structure. Both deep and surface approach scales had well identified motive and strategy subscales. The revision process has resulted in a simple questionnaire which teachers can use to evaluate their own teaching and the learning approaches of their students.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Educ Health Promot
                J Educ Health Promot
                JEHP
                Journal of Education and Health Promotion
                Wolters Kluwer - Medknow (India )
                2277-9531
                2319-6440
                2023
                29 July 2023
                : 12
                : 228
                Affiliations
                [1] LIMOME, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences Dhar Mahraz, Sidi Mohammed Ben Abdellah University, Fez, Morocco
                [1 ] LRST, High School of Education and Training (ESEF), Ibn Zohr University, Agadir, Morocco
                [2 ] Regional Center for Education and Training Professions (CRMEF Fez-Meknes), Fez, Morocco
                [3 ] LISAC, Departments of Physics and Mathematics, Faculty of Sciences Dhar Mahraz, Sidi Mohammed Ben Abdellah University, Fez, Morocco
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: Prof. Anouar Alami, LIMOME, Faculty of Sciences Dhar Mahraz, Sidi Mohammed Ben Abdellah University, B.P 2626, Fez - 30000, Morocco. E-mail: anouar.alami@ 123456usmba.ac.ma
                Article
                JEHP-12-228
                10.4103/jehp.jehp_203_23
                10506742
                37727427
                d7a450b8-3cd0-4020-99f7-f4a4d18387a2
                Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Education and Health Promotion

                This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

                History
                : 14 February 2023
                : 03 May 2023
                Categories
                Original Article

                deep approach,psychometric properties,sal,spq,surface approach

                Comments

                Comment on this article