7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Muscarinic receptor subtypes modulating smooth muscle contractility in the urinary bladder.

      Life Sciences
      Animals, Binding Sites, Humans, Muscarinic Antagonists, metabolism, pharmacology, therapeutic use, Muscle Contraction, Muscle, Smooth, innervation, physiology, Receptors, Muscarinic, Signal Transduction, Urinary Bladder

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Normal physiological voiding as well as generation of abnormal bladder contractions in diseased states is critically dependent on acetylcholine-induced stimulation of contractile muscarinic receptors on the smooth muscle (detrusor) of the urinary bladder. Muscarinic receptor antagonists are efficacious in treating the symptoms of bladder hyperactivity, such as urge incontinence, although the usefulness of available drugs is limited by undesirable side-effects. Detrusor smooth muscle is endowed principally with M2 and M3 muscarinic receptors with the former predominating in number. M3 muscarinic receptors, coupled to stimulation of phosphoinositide turnover, mediate the direct contractile effects of acetylcholine in the detrusor. Emerging evidence suggests that M2 muscarinic receptors, via inhibition of adenylyl cyclase, cause smooth muscle contraction indirectly by inhibiting sympathetically (beta-adrenoceptor)-mediated relaxation. In certain diseased states, M2 receptors may also contribute to direct smooth muscle contraction. Other contractile mechanisms involving M2 muscarinic receptors, such as activation of a non-specific cationic channel and inactivation of potassium channels, may also be operative in the bladder and requires further investigation. From a therapeutic standpoint, combined blockade of M2 and M3 muscarinic receptors would seem to be ideal since this approach would evoke complete inhibition of cholinergically-evoked smooth muscle contractions. However, if either the M2 or M3 receptor assumes a greater pathophysiological role in disease states, then selective antagonism of only one of the two receptors may be the more rational approach. The ultimate therapeutic strategy is also influenced by the extent to which pre-junctional M1 facilitatory and M2 inhibitory muscarinic receptors regulate acetylcholine release and also which subtypes mediate the undesirable effects of muscarinic receptor blockade such as dry mouth. Finally, the consequence of muscarinic receptor blockade in the central nervous system on the micturition reflex, an issue which is poorly studied and seldom taken into consideration, should not be ignored.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article