40
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Habitat degradation negatively affects auditory settlement behavior of coral reef fishes

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Significance

          Climate change is causing widespread damage to the world’s tropical coral reefs, via increases in cyclones and mass bleaching. Healthy populations of reef fishes facilitate recovery from such events, and recruitment of juvenile fish is influenced by acoustic cues that guide larval orientation, habitat selection, and settlement to reefs. Our matched recordings of Australia’s Great Barrier Reef before and after recent severe degradation demonstrate major changes to natural reef sound. In field experiments using these recordings, we show the potential impact of such acoustic changes. Postdegradation reef sounds were less attractive to young fishes than their predegradation equivalents. Reductions in fish settlement, caused by acoustic changes, may threaten the recovery potential of degraded coral reefs.

          Abstract

          Coral reefs are increasingly degraded by climate-induced bleaching and storm damage. Reef recovery relies on recruitment of young fishes for the replenishment of functionally important taxa. Acoustic cues guide the orientation, habitat selection, and settlement of many fishes, but these processes may be impaired if degradation alters reef soundscapes. Here, we report spatiotemporally matched evidence of soundscapes altered by degradation from recordings taken before and after recent severe damage on Australia’s Great Barrier Reef. Postdegradation soundscapes were an average of 15 dB re 1 µPa quieter and had significantly reduced acoustic complexity, richness, and rates of invertebrate snaps compared with their predegradation equivalents. We then used these matched recordings in complementary light-trap and patch-reef experiments to assess responses of wild fish larvae under natural conditions. We show that postdegradation soundscapes were 8% less attractive to presettlement larvae and resulted in 40% less settlement of juvenile fishes than predegradation soundscapes; postdegradation soundscapes were no more attractive than open-ocean sound. However, our experimental design does not allow an estimate of how much attraction and settlement to isolated postdegradation soundscapes might change compared with isolated predegradation soundscapes. Reductions in attraction and settlement were qualitatively similar across and within all trophic guilds and taxonomic groups analyzed. These patterns may lead to declines in fish populations, exacerbating degradation. Acoustic changes might therefore trigger a feedback loop that could impair reef resilience. To understand fully the recovery potential of coral reefs, we must learn to listen.

          Related collections

          Most cited references53

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Rising to the challenge of sustaining coral reef resilience.

          Phase-shifts from one persistent assemblage of species to another have become increasingly commonplace on coral reefs and in many other ecosystems due to escalating human impacts. Coral reef science, monitoring and global assessments have focused mainly on producing detailed descriptions of reef decline, and continue to pay insufficient attention to the underlying processes causing degradation. A more productive way forward is to harness new theoretical insights and empirical information on why some reefs degrade and others do not. Learning how to avoid undesirable phase-shifts, and how to reverse them when they occur, requires an urgent reform of scientific approaches, policies, governance structures and coral reef management. Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Ecological Relationships of the Fish Fauna on Coral Reefs of the Marshall Islands

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Rapid Acoustic Survey for Biodiversity Appraisal

              Biodiversity assessment remains one of the most difficult challenges encountered by ecologists and conservation biologists. This task is becoming even more urgent with the current increase of habitat loss. Many methods–from rapid biodiversity assessments (RBA) to all-taxa biodiversity inventories (ATBI)–have been developed for decades to estimate local species richness. However, these methods are costly and invasive. Several animals–birds, mammals, amphibians, fishes and arthropods–produce sounds when moving, communicating or sensing their environment. Here we propose a new concept and method to describe biodiversity. We suggest to forego species or morphospecies identification used by ATBI and RBA respectively but rather to tackle the problem at another evolutionary unit, the community level. We also propose that a part of diversity can be estimated and compared through a rapid acoustic analysis of the sound produced by animal communities. We produced α and β diversity indexes that we first tested with 540 simulated acoustic communities. The α index, which measures acoustic entropy, shows a logarithmic correlation with the number of species within the acoustic community. The β index, which estimates both temporal and spectral dissimilarities, is linearly linked to the number of unshared species between acoustic communities. We then applied both indexes to two closely spaced Tanzanian dry lowland coastal forests. Indexes reveal for this small sample a lower acoustic diversity for the most disturbed forest and acoustic dissimilarities between the two forests suggest that degradation could have significantly decreased and modified community composition. Our results demonstrate for the first time that an indicator of biological diversity can be reliably obtained in a non-invasive way and with a limited sampling effort. This new approach may facilitate the appraisal of animal diversity at large spatial and temporal scales.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
                Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A
                pnas
                pnas
                PNAS
                Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
                National Academy of Sciences
                0027-8424
                1091-6490
                15 May 2018
                30 April 2018
                30 April 2018
                : 115
                : 20
                : 5193-5198
                Affiliations
                [1] aBiosciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter , Exeter EX4 4QD, United Kingdom;
                [2] bSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol , Bristol BS8 1TQ, United Kingdom;
                [3] cDepartment of Biology, Duke University , Durham, NC 27708;
                [4] dCentre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science , Suffolk NR33 0HT, United Kingdom;
                [5] eAustralian Institute of Marine Science , Perth, WA 6009, Australia;
                [6] fAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University , Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia;
                [7] gDepartment of Marine Biology and Aquaculture, James Cook University , Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia
                Author notes
                1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: tg333@ 123456exeter.ac.uk .

                Edited by Nancy Knowlton, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, and approved March 19, 2018 (received for review November 4, 2017)

                Author contributions: T.A.C.G., H.R.H., M.G.M., M.I.M., A.N.R., and S.D.S. designed research; T.A.C.G., H.R.H., K.E.W., M.I.M., and S.D.S. performed research; T.A.C.G., N.D.M., A.N.R., and S.D.S. analyzed data; and T.A.C.G., H.R.H., K.E.W., N.D.M., M.G.M., M.I.M., A.N.R., and S.D.S. wrote the paper.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0305-6603
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9289-1645
                Article
                201719291
                10.1073/pnas.1719291115
                5960293
                29712839
                e056fa84-1043-4cd9-87cb-21063f0c4e08
                Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

                This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND).

                History
                Page count
                Pages: 6
                Funding
                Funded by: RCUK | Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) 501100000270
                Award ID: NE/P001572/1
                Funded by: RCUK | Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) 501100000270
                Award ID: NE/L002434/1
                Funded by: Royal Society 501100000288
                Award ID: RG160452
                Funded by: Australian Research Council (ARC) 501100000923
                Award ID: DP170103372
                Categories
                Biological Sciences
                Ecology
                From the Cover

                acoustics,climate change,coral reefs,great barrier reef,settlement

                Comments

                Comment on this article