27
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Perspective-taking is two-sided: Misunderstandings between people with Asperger’s syndrome and their family members

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Misunderstandings are social in nature, always having two sides. Yet the misunderstandings experienced by people with Asperger’s syndrome are usually studied in terms of the individual with a diagnosis, with less emphasis on social relations. We use a two-sided methodology to map out misunderstandings within 22 dyads (n = 44) consisting of people with Asperger’s syndrome and their family members. Both sides of the relationship were asked about 12 topics in terms of one’s rating of Self, one’s rating of Other and one’s predicted rating by Other. The findings show that people with Asperger’s are able to predict lower scores from family members, despite disagreeing with their view, and that family members often over-estimate the extent to which their relatives with Asperger’s syndrome are egocentrically anchored in their own perspective. The research demonstrates that a two-sided methodology is viable, and it uses it to identify how representations of Asperger’s syndrome can both support and hinder social understanding within relationships affected by Asperger’s.

          Related collections

          Most cited references66

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment.

          The authors propose that people adopt others' perspectives by serially adjusting from their own. As predicted, estimates of others' perceptions were consistent with one's own but differed in a manner consistent with serial adjustment (Study 1). Participants were slower to indicate that another's perception would be different from--rather than similar to--their own (Study 2). Egocentric biases increased under time pressure (Study 2) and decreased with accuracy incentives (Study 3). Egocentric biases also increased when participants were more inclined to accept plausible values encountered early in the adjustment process than when inclined to reject them (Study 4). Finally, adjustments tend to be insufficient, in part, because people stop adjusting once a plausible estimate is reached (Study 5). ((c) 2004 APA, all rights reserved)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Repair After Next Turn: The Last Structurally Provided Defense of Intersubjectivity in Conversation

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Iterative categorization (IC): a systematic technique for analysing qualitative data

              Abstract The processes of analysing qualitative data, particularly the stage between coding and publication, are often vague and/or poorly explained within addiction science and research more broadly. A simple but rigorous and transparent technique for analysing qualitative textual data, developed within the field of addiction, is described. The technique, iterative categorization (IC), is suitable for use with inductive and deductive codes and can support a range of common analytical approaches, e.g. thematic analysis, Framework, constant comparison, analytical induction, content analysis, conversational analysis, discourse analysis, interpretative phenomenological analysis and narrative analysis. Once the data have been coded, the only software required is a standard word processing package. Worked examples are provided.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Autism
                Autism
                AUT
                spaut
                Autism
                SAGE Publications (Sage UK: London, England )
                1362-3613
                1461-7005
                07 July 2017
                August 2018
                : 22
                : 6
                : 740-750
                Affiliations
                [1-1362361317708287]The London School of Economics and Political Science, UK
                Author notes
                [*]Brett Heasman, Department of Psychological and Behavioural Science, The London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, UK. Email: b.l.heasman@ 123456lse.ac.uk
                Article
                10.1177_1362361317708287
                10.1177/1362361317708287
                6055325
                28683569
                e0debf1c-7d51-45dc-83ee-85f001c4ffa9
                © The Author(s) 2017

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License ( http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page ( http://www.uk.sagepub.com/aboutus/openaccess.htm).

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: Economic and Social Research Council, FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100000269;
                Award ID: ES/J500070/1
                Categories
                Original Articles

                asperger’s syndrome,family relationships,methodology,misunderstanding,mixed methods,perspective-taking

                Comments

                Comment on this article