19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Private specificities of CD8 T cell responses control patterns of heterologous immunity

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          CD8 T cell cross-reactivity between viruses can play roles in protective heterologous immunity and damaging immunopathology. This cross-reactivity is sometimes predictable, such as between lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) and Pichinde virus, where cross-reactive epitopes share six out of eight amino acids. Here, however, we demonstrate more subtle and less predictable cross-reactivity between LCMV and the unrelated vaccinia virus (VV). Epitope-specific T cell receptor usage differed between individual LCMV-infected C57BL/6 mice, even though the mice had similar epitope-specific T cell hierarchies. LCMV-immune mice challenged with VV showed variations, albeit in a distinct hierarchy, in proliferative expansions of and down-regulation of IL-7Rα by T cells specific to different LCMV epitopes. T cell responses to a VV-encoded epitope that is cross-reactive with LCMV fluctuated greatly in VV-infected LCMV-immune mice. Adoptive transfers of splenocytes from individual LCMV-immune donors resulted in nearly identical VV-induced responses in each of several recipients, but responses differed depending on the donor. This indicates that the specificities of T cell responses that are not shared between individuals may influence cross-reactivity with other antigens and play roles in heterologous immunity upon encounter with another pathogen. This variability in cross-reactive T cell expansion that is unique to the individual may underlie variation in the pathogenesis of infectious diseases.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Determination of lymphocyte division by flow cytometry.

          Techniques currently available for determining cell division are able to show one or, at best, a limited number of cell divisions. Other methods exist which can quantify overall division, but tell nothing about the division history of individual cells. Here we present a new technique in which an intracellular fluorescent label is divided equally between daughter cells upon cell division. The technique is applicable to in vitro cell division, as well as in vivo division of adoptively transferred cells, and can resolve multiple successive generations using flow cytometry. The label is fluorescein derived, allowing monoclonal antibodies conjugated to phycoerythrin or other compatible fluorochromes to be used to immunophenotype the dividing cells.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            No one is naive: the significance of heterologous T-cell immunity.

            Memory T cells that are specific for one virus can become activated during infection with an unrelated heterologous virus, and might have roles in protective immunity and immunopathology. The course of each infection is influenced by the T-cell memory pool that has been laid down by a host's history of previous infections, and with each successive infection, T-cell memory to previously encountered agents is modified. Here, we discuss evidence from studies in mice and humans that shows the importance of this phenomenon in determining the outcome of infection.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Differential regulation of antiviral T-cell immunity results in stable CD8+ but declining CD4+ T-cell memory.

              Emerging evidence indicates that CD8+ and CD4+ T-cell immunity is differentially regulated. Here we have delineated differences and commonalities among antiviral T-cell responses by enumeration and functional profiling of eight specific CD8+ and CD4+ T-cell populations during primary, memory and recall responses. A high degree of coordinate regulation among all specific T-cell populations stood out against an approximately 20-fold lower peak expansion and prolonged contraction phase of specific CD4+ T-cell populations. Surprisingly, although CD8+ T-cell memory was stably maintained for life, levels of specific CD4+ memory T cells gradually declined. However, this decay, which seemed to result from less efficient rescue from apoptosis, did not affect functionality of surviving virus-specific CD4+ T cells. Our results indicate that CD4+ T-cell memory might become limiting under physiological conditions and that conditions precipitating CD4+ T-cell loss might compromise protective immunity even in the presence of unimpaired CD8+ T-cell responses.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Exp Med
                The Journal of Experimental Medicine
                The Rockefeller University Press
                0022-1007
                1540-9538
                21 February 2005
                : 201
                : 4
                : 523-533
                Affiliations
                Department of Pathology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655
                Author notes

                CORRESPONDENCE Raymond Welsh: Raymond.welsh@ 123456umassmed.edu

                Article
                20041337
                10.1084/jem.20041337
                2213046
                15710651
                ebf209aa-2c94-40bc-a3da-e759a793afb2
                Copyright © 2005, The Rockefeller University Press
                History
                : 6 July 2004
                : 7 December 2004
                Categories
                Article

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article