39
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Current worldwide nuclear cardiology practices and radiation exposure: results from the 65 country IAEA Nuclear Cardiology Protocols Cross-Sectional Study (INCAPS)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aims

          To characterize patient radiation doses from nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and the use of radiation-optimizing ‘best practices’ worldwide, and to evaluate the relationship between laboratory use of best practices and patient radiation dose.

          Methods and results

          We conducted an observational cross-sectional study of protocols used for all 7911 MPI studies performed in 308 nuclear cardiology laboratories in 65 countries for a single week in March–April 2013. Eight ‘best practices’ relating to radiation exposure were identified a priori by an expert committee, and a radiation-related quality index (QI) devised indicating the number of best practices used by a laboratory. Patient radiation effective dose (ED) ranged between 0.8 and 35.6 mSv (median 10.0 mSv). Average laboratory ED ranged from 2.2 to 24.4 mSv (median 10.4 mSv); only 91 (30%) laboratories achieved the median ED ≤ 9 mSv recommended by guidelines. Laboratory QIs ranged from 2 to 8 (median 5). Both ED and QI differed significantly between laboratories, countries, and world regions. The lowest median ED (8.0 mSv), in Europe, coincided with high best-practice adherence (mean laboratory QI 6.2). The highest doses (median 12.1 mSv) and low QI (4.9) occurred in Latin America. In hierarchical regression modelling, patients undergoing MPI at laboratories following more ‘best practices’ had lower EDs.

          Conclusion

          Marked worldwide variation exists in radiation safety practices pertaining to MPI, with targeted EDs currently achieved in a minority of laboratories. The significant relationship between best-practice implementation and lower doses indicates numerous opportunities to reduce radiation exposure from MPI globally.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures.

          The growing use of imaging procedures in the United States has raised concerns about exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation in the general population. We identified 952,420 nonelderly adults (between 18 and 64 years of age) in five health care markets across the United States between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2007. Utilization data were used to estimate cumulative effective doses of radiation from imaging procedures and to calculate population-based rates of exposure, with annual effective doses defined as low ( 3 to 20 mSv), high (> 20 to 50 mSv), or very high (> 50 mSv). During the study period, 655,613 enrollees (68.8%) underwent at least one imaging procedure associated with radiation exposure. The mean (+/-SD) cumulative effective dose from imaging procedures was 2.4+/-6.0 mSv per enrollee per year; however, a wide distribution was noted, with a median effective dose of 0.1 mSv per enrollee per year (interquartile range, 0.0 to 1.7). Overall, moderate effective doses of radiation were incurred in 193.8 enrollees per 1000 per year, whereas high and very high doses were incurred in 18.6 and 1.9 enrollees per 1000 per year, respectively. In general, cumulative effective doses of radiation from imaging procedures increased with advancing age and were higher in women than in men. Computed tomographic and nuclear imaging accounted for 75.4% of the cumulative effective dose, with 81.8% of the total administered in outpatient settings. Imaging procedures are an important source of exposure to ionizing radiation in the United States and can result in high cumulative effective doses of radiation. 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Radiation dose to patients from cardiac diagnostic imaging.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              EANM/ESC procedural guidelines for myocardial perfusion imaging in nuclear cardiology.

              The European procedural guidelines for radionuclide imaging of myocardial perfusion and viability are presented in 13 sections covering patient information, radiopharmaceuticals, injected activities and dosimetry, stress tests, imaging protocols and acquisition, quality control and reconstruction methods, gated studies and attenuation-scatter compensation, data analysis, reports and image display, and positron emission tomography. If the specific recommendations given could not be based on evidence from original, scientific studies, we tried to express this state-of-art. The guidelines are designed to assist in the practice of performing, interpreting and reporting myocardial perfusion SPET. The guidelines do not discuss clinical indications, benefits or drawbacks of radionuclide myocardial imaging compared to non-nuclear techniques, nor do they cover cost benefit or cost effectiveness.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Eur Heart J
                Eur. Heart J
                eurheartj
                ehj
                European Heart Journal
                Oxford University Press
                0195-668X
                1522-9645
                07 July 2015
                21 April 2015
                21 April 2015
                : 36
                : 26
                : 1689-1696
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center and New York-Presbyterian Hospital , New York, NY, USA
                [2 ]Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center and New York-Presbyterian Hospital , New York, NY, USA
                [3 ]Section of Nuclear Medicine and Diagnostic Imaging, Division of Human Health, International Atomic Energy Agency , Vienna, Austria
                [4 ]Department of Cardiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences , New Delhi, India
                [5 ]Quanta Diagnóstico & Terapia , Curitiba, Brazil
                [6 ]Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, TX, USA
                [7 ]Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital and University of Melbourne , Melbourne, Australia
                [8 ]Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Bab El Ouéd , Alger, Algeria
                [9 ]Department of Nuclear Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School , Gwangju, Republic of Korea
                [10 ]Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET-CT, Jaslok Hospital and Research Centre , Mumbai, India
                [11 ]Department of Physical Sciences and Mathematics, University of the Philippines , Philippines
                [12 ]Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Santo Tomas Hospital , Manila, Philippines
                [13 ]Departamento de Cardiología Nuclear, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología ‘Ignacio Chávez’ , Mexico, Mexico
                [14 ]Cardiology Department, Al Azhar University , Cairo, Egypt
                [15 ]Division of Advanced Cardiac Imaging, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences , Riyad, Saudi Arabia
                [16 ]Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona , Barcelona, Spain
                [17 ]Intersocietal Accreditation Commission , Ellicott City, MD, USA
                [18 ]Division of Cardiology, University of Maryland , Baltimore, MD, USA
                [19 ]Department of Nuclear Medicine and Cardiac Imaging, University Hospital Zurich , Zurich, Switzerland
                [20 ]Medical Technology and Infrastructure Administration, Ministry of Health, Jerusalem, Israel
                [21 ]Israeli Center for Technology Assessment in Health Care, Gertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Policy Research , Tel Hashomer, Israel
                [22 ]Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, and Emory Clinical Cardiovascular Research Institute, Emory University School of Medicine , Atlanta, GA, USA
                [23 ]National Heart and Lung Institute , Imperial College London , UK
                [24 ]Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals , London, UK
                [25 ]Radiation Protection of Patients Unit, International Atomic Energy Agency , Vienna, Austria
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. Tel: +1 212 305 6812, Fax:+1 212 305 4648, Email: andrew.einstein@ 123456columbia.edu
                Article
                ehv117
                10.1093/eurheartj/ehv117
                4493324
                25898845
                f053dd85-cd9d-4a5b-b59f-eb9dfe35c7ce
                © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                : 25 November 2014
                : 20 February 2015
                : 19 March 2015
                Categories
                Clinical Research
                Imaging

                Cardiovascular Medicine
                nuclear cardiology,spect,pet,radiation dose,best practices,quality of care
                Cardiovascular Medicine
                nuclear cardiology, spect, pet, radiation dose, best practices, quality of care

                Comments

                Comment on this article