11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Bioanalytical strategy used in development of pharmacokinetic (PK) methods that support biosimilar programs

      report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The development of biosimilar products is expected to grow rapidly over the next five years as a large number of approved biologics reach patent expiry. The pathway to regulatory approval requires that similarity of the biosimilar to the reference product be demonstrated through physiochemical and structural characterization, as well as within in vivo studies that compare the safety and efficacy profiles of the products. To support nonclinical and clinical studies pharmacokinetic (PK) assays are required to measure the biosimilar and reference products with comparable precision and accuracy. The most optimal approach is to develop a single PK assay, using a single analytical standard, for quantitative measurement of the biosimilar and reference products in serum matrix. Use of a single PK assay for quantification of multiple products requires a scientifically sound testing strategy to evaluate bioanalytical comparability of the test products within the method, and provide a solid data package to support the conclusions. To meet these objectives, a comprehensive approach with scientific rigor was applied to the development and characterization of PK assays that are used in support of biosimilar programs. Herein we describe the bioanalytical strategy and testing paradigm that has been used across several programs to determine bioanalytical comparability of the biosimilar and reference products. Data from one program is presented, with statistical results demonstrating the biosimilar and reference products were bioanalytically equivalent within the method. The cumulative work has established a framework for future biosimilar PK assay development.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Quantitative bioanalytical methods validation and implementation: best practices for chromatographic and ligand binding assays.

          The Third AAPS/FDA Bioanalytical Workshop, entitled "Quantitative Bioanalytical Methods Validation and Implementation: Best Practices for Chromatographic and Ligand Binding Assays" was held on May 1-3, 2006 in Arlington, VA. The format of this workshop consisted of presentations on bioanalytical topics, followed by discussion sessions where these topics could be debated, with the goal of reaching consensus, or identifying subjects where addition input or clarification was required. The discussion also addressed bioanalytical validation requirements of regulatory agencies, with the purpose of clarifying expectations for regulatory submissions. The proceedings from each day were reviewed and summarized in the evening sessions among the speakers and moderators of the day. The consensus summary was presented back to the workshop on the last day and was further debated. This communication represents the distillate of the workshop proceedings and provides the summary of consensus reached and also contains the validation topics where no consensus was reached.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Comparability and biosimilarity: considerations for the healthcare provider.

            Healthcare providers use recombinant biologics such as monoclonal antibodies to treat a variety of serious illnesses. Manufacturing of approved biotechnology products is complex, and the quality of the resulting biologic is dependent on careful control of process inputs and operating conditions. Biosimilars, which are similar but not identical to innovator biologics, are entering regulatory evaluation, approval, and marketing in regions with biosimilar approval pathways. This article describes the evaluation and potential impact of manufacturing process changes and biosimilar product development, and explores the similarities and distinctions between the two. Regulatory agencies generally require a comparability exercise following a manufacturing process change. This comparability is focused primarily on analytical characterization of the approved product before and after the manufacturing process change, with non-clinical and clinical confirmation required when determined necessary. When developing a biosimilar, the manufacturer does not have access to key information including the innovator manufacturer's cell line, cell culture conditions, purification procedures, and fill and finish processes. Further, the biosimilar manufacturer does not have access to information about the innovator manufacturer's product development history, including knowledge about the quality attributes of lots used in non-clinical and clinical development. We define the biosimilar manufacturer's lack of information as the knowledge gap. As a result, a biosimilarity exercise to compare a biosimilar to an approved innovator biologic requires a rigorous evaluation to ensure the safety and efficacy of the biosimilar. Given the knowledge gap under which biosimilars are developed, data to establish biosimilarity should go beyond a simple comparability exercise.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Biosimilars: Company Strategies to Capture Value from the Biologics Market

              Patents for several biologic blockbusters will expire in the next few years. The arrival of biosimilars, the biologic equivalent of chemical generics, will have an impact on the current biopharmaceuticals market. Five core capabilities have been identified as paramount for those companies aiming to enter the biosimilars market: research and development, manufacturing, supporting activities, marketing, and lobbying. Understanding the importance of each of these capabilities will be key to maximising the value generated from the biologics patent cliff.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                MAbs
                MAbs
                KMAB
                mAbs
                Taylor & Francis
                1942-0862
                1942-0870
                Sep-Oct 2014
                1 November 2014
                : 6
                : 5
                : 1178-1189
                Affiliations
                Department of Pharmacokinetics and Drug Metabolism ; Amgen Inc.; USA
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence to: Susan Pederson; Email: susnpederson@ 123456yahoo.com
                Article
                972766
                10.4161/mabs.32114
                4623269
                25517303
                f1371cac-d4bc-43b8-a08c-b620e52a58e3
                © 2014 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC© Alex Colbert, Amber Umble-Romero, Samantha Prokop, Vincent Fung-Sing Chow, Teresa Wong, Danielle DeSimone, Lei Zhou, and Susan Pederson

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserted.

                History
                : 28 May 2014
                : 11 July 2014
                : 22 July 2014
                Page count
                Figures: 9, Tables: 5, References: 29, Pages: 12
                Categories
                Reports

                Immunology
                biotherapeutics,biosimilar,bioanalytical,pharmacokinetic,pharmacodynamics,recombinant,comparability

                Comments

                Comment on this article