Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Comparison of Leukocyte-Rich Platelet-Rich Plasma and Leukocyte-Poor Platelet-Rich Plasma on Achilles Tendinopathy at an Early Stage in a Rabbit Model

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Tendinopathy is still a great challenge in clinical practice, and the role of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is controversial. The influence of leukocytes on tendinopathy at an early stage has not been defined so far.

          Purpose:

          To compare the effects of leukocyte-rich PRP (Lr-PRP) and leukocyte-poor PRP (Lp-PRP) on Achilles tendinopathy when applied at an early stage.

          Study Design:

          Controlled laboratory study.

          Methods:

          A rabbit Achilles tendinopathy model was induced by a collagenase injection. A week later, treatments were applied randomly on local Achilles tendon lesions: (1) 200 μL of Lr-PRP (16 legs), (2) 200 μL of Lp-PRP (16 legs), and (3) 200 μL of saline (16 legs). At 3 and 6 weeks after the collagenase injection, outcomes were evaluated by histology, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis, immunohistochemistry, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM).

          Results:

          The Lr-PRP group had a lower T2 signal intensity ( P = .0377) and smaller diameter ( P = .0193) and cross-sectional area ( P = .0194) than the Lp-PRP group on MRI. Histologically, the Lr-PRP group had better scores than the Lp-PRP group ( P = .0284 and P = .0188, respectively). Compared with the Lp-PRP group, higher gene expression and more protein synthesis of collagen I ( P = .0160 and P = .0309, respectively) and CD163 ( P < .0001 and P = .0411, respectively) were found in the Lr-PRP group. Considering TEM and biomechanical testing, the Lr-PRP group demonstrated more mature collagen fibers ( P < .0001), a larger fiber diameter ( P = .0005), a higher failure load ( P = .00417), and higher tensile stress ( P < .0001) than the Lp-PRP group.

          Conclusion:

          Lr-PRP had more beneficial effects than Lp-PRP when delivered at an early stage during tendon repair.

          Clinical Relevance:

          Here, we showed that tendinopathy influenced the curative effects of PRP in vivo. An early-stage application of Lr-PRP had more benefits for the repair of tendinopathy than Lp-PRP in a rabbit model, which will supplement guidelines of PRP treatment on tendinopathy clinically.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          The American Journal of Sports Medicine
          Am J Sports Med
          SAGE Publications
          0363-5465
          1552-3365
          April 2020
          March 05 2020
          April 2020
          : 48
          : 5
          : 1189-1199
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
          Article
          10.1177/0363546520906142
          32134682
          f23a35ed-ae2c-4bc6-b6b2-6cc2303ad567
          © 2020

          http://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article