13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Conserved regulation of RNA processing in somatic cell reprogramming

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Along with the reorganization of epigenetic and transcriptional networks, somatic cell reprogramming brings about numerous changes at the level of RNA processing. These include the expression of specific transcript isoforms and 3’ untranslated regions. A number of studies have uncovered RNA processing factors that modulate the efficiency of the reprogramming process. However, a comprehensive evaluation of the involvement of RNA processing factors in the reprogramming of somatic mammalian cells is lacking.

          Results

          Here, we used data from a large number of studies carried out in three mammalian species, mouse, chimpanzee and human, to uncover consistent changes in gene expression upon reprogramming of somatic cells. We found that a core set of nine splicing factors have consistent changes across the majority of data sets in all three species. Most striking among these are ESRP1 and ESRP2, which accelerate and enhance the efficiency of somatic cell reprogramming by promoting isoform expression changes associated with mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition. We further identify genes and processes in which splicing changes are observed in both human and mouse.

          Conclusions

          Our results provide a general resource for gene expression and splicing changes that take place during somatic cell reprogramming. Furthermore, they support the concept that splicing factors with evolutionarily conserved, cell type-specific expression can modulate the efficiency of the process by reinforcing intermediate states resembling the cell types in which these factors are normally expressed.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1186/s12864-019-5438-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references54

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Naive and primed pluripotent states.

          After maternal predetermination gives way to zygotic regulation, a ground state is established within the mammalian embryo. This tabula rasa for embryogenesis is present only transiently in the preimplantation epiblast. Here, we consider how unrestricted cells are first generated and then prepared for lineage commitment. We propose that two phases of pluripotency can be defined: naive and primed. This distinction extends to pluripotent stem cells derived from embryos or by molecular reprogramming ex vivo.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Ensembl BioMarts: a hub for data retrieval across taxonomic space

            For a number of years the BioMart data warehousing system has proven to be a valuable resource for scientists seeking a fast and versatile means of accessing the growing volume of genomic data provided by the Ensembl project. The launch of the Ensembl Genomes project in 2009 complemented the Ensembl project by utilizing the same visualization, interactive and programming tools to provide users with a means for accessing genome data from a further five domains: protists, bacteria, metazoa, plants and fungi. The Ensembl and Ensembl Genomes BioMarts provide a point of access to the high-quality gene annotation, variation data, functional and regulatory annotation and evolutionary relationships from genomes spanning the taxonomic space. This article aims to give a comprehensive overview of the Ensembl and Ensembl Genomes BioMarts as well as some useful examples and a description of current data content and future objectives. Database URLs: http://www.ensembl.org/biomart/martview/; http://metazoa.ensembl.org/biomart/martview/; http://plants.ensembl.org/biomart/martview/; http://protists.ensembl.org/biomart/martview/; http://fungi.ensembl.org/biomart/martview/; http://bacteria.ensembl.org/biomart/martview/
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The evolutionary landscape of alternative splicing in vertebrate species.

              How species with similar repertoires of protein-coding genes differ so markedly at the phenotypic level is poorly understood. By comparing organ transcriptomes from vertebrate species spanning ~350 million years of evolution, we observed significant differences in alternative splicing complexity between vertebrate lineages, with the highest complexity in primates. Within 6 million years, the splicing profiles of physiologically equivalent organs diverged such that they are more strongly related to the identity of a species than they are to organ type. Most vertebrate species-specific splicing patterns are cis-directed. However, a subset of pronounced splicing changes are predicted to remodel protein interactions involving trans-acting regulators. These events likely further contributed to the diversification of splicing and other transcriptomic changes that underlie phenotypic differences among vertebrate species.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                alexander.kanitz@unibas.ch
                afzal.syed@helmholtz-muenchen.de
                kkaji@exseed.ed.ac.uk
                mihaela.zavolan@unibas.ch
                Journal
                BMC Genomics
                BMC Genomics
                BMC Genomics
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2164
                31 January 2019
                31 January 2019
                2019
                : 20
                : 100
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1937 0642, GRID grid.6612.3, Biozentrum, , University of Basel, ; Basel, Switzerland
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2223 3006, GRID grid.419765.8, RNA Regulatory Networks, , Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, ; Lausanne, Switzerland
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7988, GRID grid.4305.2, MRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, , University of Edinburgh, ; Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8832-2041
                Article
                5438
                10.1186/s12864-019-5438-2
                6357513
                30704403
                f624800f-25bd-4a03-9323-09d3cb631689
                © The Author(s). 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 9 September 2018
                : 8 January 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000781, European Research Council;
                Award ID: 310510-WHYMIR
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100009187, Medical Research Foundation;
                Award ID: MR/N008715/1
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Genetics
                ips cells,somatic cell reprogramming,rna processing,alternative splicing
                Genetics
                ips cells, somatic cell reprogramming, rna processing, alternative splicing

                Comments

                Comment on this article