13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Clustered Mendelian randomization analyses identify distinct and opposing pathways in the association between genetically influenced insulin-like growth factor-1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          There is inconsistent evidence for the causal role of serum insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) concentration in the pathogenesis of human age-related diseases such as type 2 diabetes (T2D). Here, we investigated the association between IGF-1 and T2D using (clustered) Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses in the UK Biobank.

          Methods

          We conducted Cox proportional hazard analyses in 451 232 European-ancestry individuals of the UK Biobank (55.3% women, mean age at recruitment 56.6 years), among which 13 247 individuals developed type 2 diabetes during up to 12 years of follow-up. In addition, we conducted two-sample MR analyses based on independent single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with IGF-1. Given the heterogeneity between the MR effect estimates of individual instruments ( P-value for Q statistic = 4.03e−145), we also conducted clustered MR analyses. Biological pathway analyses of the identified clusters were performed by over-representation analyses.

          Results

          In the Cox proportional hazard models, with IGF-1 concentrations stratified in quintiles, we observed that participants in the lowest quintile had the highest relative risk of type 2 diabetes [hazard ratio (HR): 1.31; 95% CI: 1.23–1.39). In contrast, in the two-sample MR analyses, higher genetically influenced IGF-1 was associated with a higher risk of type 2 diabetes. Based on the heterogeneous distribution of MR effect estimates of individual instruments, six clusters of genetically determined IGF-1 associated either with a lower or a higher risk of type 2 diabetes were identified. The main clusters in which a higher IGF-1 was associated with a lower risk of type 2 diabetes consisted of instruments mapping to genes in the growth hormone signalling pathway, whereas the main clusters in which a higher IGF-1 was associated with a higher risk of type 2 diabetes consisted of instruments mapping to genes in pathways related to amino acid metabolism and genomic integrity.

          Conclusions

          The IGF-1-associated SNPs used as genetic instruments in MR analyses showed a heterogeneous distribution of MR effect estimates on the risk of type 2 diabetes. This was likely explained by differences in the underlying molecular pathways that increase IGF-1 concentration and differentially mediate the effects of IGF-1 on type 2 diabetes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          A global reference for human genetic variation

          The 1000 Genomes Project set out to provide a comprehensive description of common human genetic variation by applying whole-genome sequencing to a diverse set of individuals from multiple populations. Here we report completion of the project, having reconstructed the genomes of 2,504 individuals from 26 populations using a combination of low-coverage whole-genome sequencing, deep exome sequencing, and dense microarray genotyping. We characterized a broad spectrum of genetic variation, in total over 88 million variants (84.7 million single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), 3.6 million short insertions/deletions (indels), and 60,000 structural variants), all phased onto high-quality haplotypes. This resource includes >99% of SNP variants with a frequency of >1% for a variety of ancestries. We describe the distribution of genetic variation across the global sample, and discuss the implications for common disease studies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            UK Biobank: An Open Access Resource for Identifying the Causes of a Wide Range of Complex Diseases of Middle and Old Age

            Cathie Sudlow and colleagues describe the UK Biobank, a large population-based prospective study, established to allow investigation of the genetic and non-genetic determinants of the diseases of middle and old age.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression

              Background: The number of Mendelian randomization analyses including large numbers of genetic variants is rapidly increasing. This is due to the proliferation of genome-wide association studies, and the desire to obtain more precise estimates of causal effects. However, some genetic variants may not be valid instrumental variables, in particular due to them having more than one proximal phenotypic correlate (pleiotropy). Methods: We view Mendelian randomization with multiple instruments as a meta-analysis, and show that bias caused by pleiotropy can be regarded as analogous to small study bias. Causal estimates using each instrument can be displayed visually by a funnel plot to assess potential asymmetry. Egger regression, a tool to detect small study bias in meta-analysis, can be adapted to test for bias from pleiotropy, and the slope coefficient from Egger regression provides an estimate of the causal effect. Under the assumption that the association of each genetic variant with the exposure is independent of the pleiotropic effect of the variant (not via the exposure), Egger’s test gives a valid test of the null causal hypothesis and a consistent causal effect estimate even when all the genetic variants are invalid instrumental variables. Results: We illustrate the use of this approach by re-analysing two published Mendelian randomization studies of the causal effect of height on lung function, and the causal effect of blood pressure on coronary artery disease risk. The conservative nature of this approach is illustrated with these examples. Conclusions: An adaption of Egger regression (which we call MR-Egger) can detect some violations of the standard instrumental variable assumptions, and provide an effect estimate which is not subject to these violations. The approach provides a sensitivity analysis for the robustness of the findings from a Mendelian randomization investigation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Int J Epidemiol
                Int J Epidemiol
                ije
                International Journal of Epidemiology
                Oxford University Press
                0300-5771
                1464-3685
                December 2022
                03 June 2022
                03 June 2022
                : 51
                : 6
                : 1874-1885
                Affiliations
                Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center , Leiden, The Netherlands
                Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gerontology and Geriatrics; Leiden University Medical Center , Leiden, The Netherlands
                Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center , Leiden, The Netherlands
                Laboratory Genetic Metabolic Diseases, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                Core Facility Metabolomics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center , Leiden, The Netherlands
                Department of Internal Medicine, Division Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Center , Leiden, The Netherlands
                Leiden Laboratory for Experimental Vascular Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center , Leiden, The Netherlands
                Department of Internal Medicine, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine , Springfield, IL, USA
                Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gerontology and Geriatrics; Leiden University Medical Center , Leiden, The Netherlands
                Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gerontology and Geriatrics; Leiden University Medical Center , Leiden, The Netherlands
                Author notes
                Corresponding author. Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, LUMC Main Building, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands. E-mail: w.wang1@ 123456lumc.nl
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3432-1713
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9855-3548
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7801-809X
                Article
                dyac119
                10.1093/ije/dyac119
                9749721
                35656699
                febd2075-d5f3-4412-a28e-ec52268fa793
                © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                : 12 June 2021
                : 26 April 2022
                : 17 May 2022
                Page count
                Pages: 12
                Funding
                Funded by: American Diabetes Association, DOI 10.13039/100000041;
                Award ID: #1–19-IBS-126
                Funded by: China Scholarship Council, DOI 10.13039/501100004543;
                Award ID: 201907720011
                Categories
                Diabetes
                AcademicSubjects/MED00860

                Public health
                clustered mendelian randomization analysis,cohort studies,mendelian randomization analysis,type 2 diabetes,insulin-like growth factor-1

                Comments

                Comment on this article