8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Neurog2 and Ascl1 together regulate a postmitotic derepression circuit to govern laminar fate specification in the murine neocortex

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Significance

          Projection neurons of the neocortex represent a diverse neuronal population that can be conveniently classified into three broad categories based on axon projection patterns: corticothalamic, subcerebral, and callosal. These neuronal subtypes are known to be specified postmitotically by a cortical derepression circuit involving the key transcription factors Tbr1, Fezf2, Satb2, and Ctip2. However, projection neuron identities are also known to be determined at the progenitor cell level, but the molecular mechanisms are poorly understood. Here we reveal that the proneural genes Neurog2 and Ascl1, which are together expressed in neocortical progenitors, cooperate to regulate the expression of components of the cortical derepression circuit to specify corticothalamic and subcerebral identities while repressing a callosal fate.

          Abstract

          A derepression mode of cell-fate specification involving the transcriptional repressors Tbr1, Fezf2, Satb2, and Ctip2 operates in neocortical projection neurons to specify six layer identities in sequence. Less well understood is how laminar fate transitions are regulated in cortical progenitors. The proneural genes Neurog2 and Ascl1 cooperate in progenitors to control the temporal switch from neurogenesis to gliogenesis. Here we asked whether these proneural genes also regulate laminar fate transitions. Several defects were observed in the derepression circuit in Neurog2 −/− ;Ascl1 −/− mutants: an inability to repress expression of Tbr1 (a deep layer VI marker) during upper-layer neurogenesis, a loss of Fezf2 +/Ctip2 + layer V neurons, and precocious differentiation of normally late-born, Satb2 + layer II–IV neurons. Conversely, in stable gain-of-function transgenics, Neurog2 promoted differentiative divisions and extended the period of Tbr1 +/Ctip2 + deep-layer neurogenesis while reducing Satb2 + upper-layer neurogenesis. Similarly, acute misexpression of Neurog2 in early cortical progenitors promoted Tbr1 expression, whereas both Neurog2 and Ascl1 induced Ctip2. However, Neurog2 was unable to influence the derepression circuit when misexpressed in late cortical progenitors, and Ascl1 repressed only Satb2. Nevertheless, neurons derived from late misexpression of Neurog2 and, to a lesser extent, Ascl1, extended aberrant subcortical axon projections characteristic of early-born neurons. Finally, Neurog2 and Ascl1 altered the expression of Ikaros and Foxg1, known temporal regulators. Proneural genes thus act in a context-dependent fashion as early determinants, promoting deep-layer neurogenesis in early cortical progenitors via input into the derepression circuit while also influencing other temporal regulators.

          Related collections

          Most cited references48

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Direct conversion of fibroblasts to functional neurons by defined factors

          Cellular differentiation and lineage commitment are considered robust and irreversible processes during development. Recent work has shown that mouse and human fibroblasts can be reprogrammed to a pluripotent state with a combination of four transcription factors. This raised the question of whether transcription factors could directly induce other defined somatic cell fates, and not only an undifferentiated state. We hypothesized that combinatorial expression of neural lineage-specific transcription factors could directly convert fibroblasts into neurons. Starting from a pool of nineteen candidate genes, we identified a combination of only three factors, Ascl1, Brn2, and Myt1l, that suffice to rapidly and efficiently convert mouse embryonic and postnatal fibroblasts into functional neurons in vitro. These induced neuronal (iN) cells express multiple neuron-specific proteins, generate action potentials, and form functional synapses. Generation of iN cells from non-neural lineages could have important implications for studies of neural development, neurological disease modeling, and regenerative medicine.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Neuronal subtype-specific genes that control corticospinal motor neuron development in vivo.

            Within the vertebrate nervous system, the presence of many different lineages of neurons and glia complicates the molecular characterization of single neuronal populations. In order to elucidate molecular mechanisms underlying the specification and development of corticospinal motor neurons (CSMN), we purified CSMN at distinct stages of development in vivo and compared their gene expression to two other pure populations of cortical projection neurons: callosal projection neurons and corticotectal projection neurons. We found genes that are potentially instructive for CSMN development, as well as genes that are excluded from CSMN and are restricted to other populations of neurons, even within the same cortical layer. Loss-of-function experiments in null mutant mice for Ctip2 (also known as Bcl11b), one of the newly characterized genes, demonstrate that it plays a critical role in the development of CSMN axonal projections to the spinal cord in vivo, confirming that we identified central genetic determinants of the CSMN population.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Satb2 is a postmitotic determinant for upper-layer neuron specification in the neocortex.

              Pyramidal neurons of the neocortex can be subdivided into two major groups: deep- (DL) and upper-layer (UL) neurons. Here we report that the expression of the AT-rich DNA-binding protein Satb2 defines two subclasses of UL neurons: UL1 (Satb2 positive) and UL2 (Satb2 negative). In the absence of Satb2, UL1 neurons lose their identity and activate DL- and UL2-specific genetic programs. UL1 neurons in Satb2 mutants fail to migrate to superficial layers and do not contribute to the corpus callosum but to the corticospinal tract, which is normally populated by DL axons. Ctip2, a gene required for the formation of the corticospinal tract, is ectopically expressed in all UL1 neurons in the absence of Satb2. Satb2 protein interacts with the Ctip2 genomic region and controls chromatin remodeling at this locus. Satb2 therefore is required for the initiation of the UL1-specific genetic program and for the inactivation of DL- and UL2-specific genes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
                Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A
                pnas
                pnas
                PNAS
                Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
                National Academy of Sciences
                0027-8424
                1091-6490
                20 June 2017
                5 June 2017
                5 June 2017
                : 114
                : 25
                : E4934-E4943
                Affiliations
                [1] aDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Calgary , Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada;
                [2] bAlberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary , Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada;
                [3] cHotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary , Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada;
                [4] dBiological Sciences Platform, Sunnybrook Research Institute , Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada;
                [5] eDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Toronto , Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada;
                [6] fDepartment of Medical Genetics, University of Calgary , Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada;
                [7] gDepartment of Psychology, University of Calgary , Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
                Author notes
                3To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: cschuurm@ 123456sri.utoronto.ca .

                Edited by Solomon H. Snyder, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, and approved May 10, 2017 (received for review February 1, 2017)

                Author contributions: D.J.D., G.W., S.L., C.K., D.M.K., R.H.D., and C.S. designed research; D.J.D., G.W., S.L., R.D., L.A., A.B., S.H., C.K., N.G., and R.H.D. performed research; D.J.D., G.W., S.L., R.D., L.A., A.B., S.H., N.G., D.M.K., R.H.D., and C.S. analyzed data; and D.J.D., G.W., S.L., and C.S. wrote the paper.

                1D.J.D., G.W., and S.L. contributed equally to this work.

                2Present address: State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, SunYat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, China.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3567-0058
                Article
                PMC5488939 PMC5488939 5488939 201701495
                10.1073/pnas.1701495114
                5488939
                28584103
                0a0ee772-836c-44b2-936f-899d2ec69724

                Freely available online through the PNAS open access option.

                History
                Page count
                Pages: 10
                Funding
                Funded by: Gouvernement du Canada | Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Instituts de recherche en santé du Canada) 501100000024
                Award ID: MOP-44094
                Categories
                PNAS Plus
                Biological Sciences
                Developmental Biology
                PNAS Plus

                proneural genes,temporal identity,neocortex,laminar fate specification,derepression circuit

                Comments

                Comment on this article