60
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Six1 regulates stem cell repair potential and self-renewal during skeletal muscle regeneration

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Six1 in satellite cells is important for muscle regeneration and homeostasis of the stem cell niche by regulating MyoD, Myogenin, and Dusp6-ERK signaling.

          Abstract

          Satellite cells (SCs) are stem cells that mediate skeletal muscle growth and regeneration. Here, we observe that adult quiescent SCs and their activated descendants expressed the homeodomain transcription factor Six1. Genetic disruption of Six1 specifically in adult SCs impaired myogenic cell differentiation, impaired myofiber repair during regeneration, and perturbed homeostasis of the stem cell niche, as indicated by an increase in SC self-renewal. Six1 regulated the expression of the myogenic regulatory factors MyoD and Myogenin, but not Myf5, which suggests that Six1 acts on divergent genetic networks in the embryo and in the adult. Moreover, we demonstrate that Six1 regulates the extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) pathway during regeneration via direct control of Dusp6 transcription. Muscles lacking Dusp6 were able to regenerate properly but showed a marked increase in SC number after regeneration. We conclude that Six1 homeoproteins act as a rheostat system to ensure proper regeneration of the tissue and replenishment of the stem cell pool during the events that follow skeletal muscle trauma.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A Pax3/Pax7-dependent population of skeletal muscle progenitor cells.

          During vertebrate development, successive phases of embryonic and fetal myogenesis lead to the formation and growth of skeletal muscles. Although the origin and molecular regulation of the earliest embryonic muscle cells is well understood, less is known about later stages of myogenesis. We have identified a new cell population that expresses the transcription factors Pax3 and Pax7 (paired box proteins 3 and 7) but no skeletal-muscle-specific markers. These cells are maintained as a proliferating population in embryonic and fetal muscles of the trunk and limbs throughout development. Using a stable green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter targeted to Pax3, we demonstrate that they constitute resident muscle progenitor cells that subsequently become myogenic and form skeletal muscle. Late in fetal development, these cells adopt a satellite cell position characteristic of progenitor cells in postnatal muscle. In the absence of both Pax3 and Pax7, further muscle development is arrested and only the early embryonic muscle of the myotome forms. Cells failing to express Pax3 or Pax7 die or assume a non-myogenic fate. We conclude that this resident Pax3/Pax7-dependent progenitor cell population constitutes a source of myogenic cells of prime importance for skeletal muscle formation, a finding also of potential value in the context of cell therapy for muscle disease.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Repairing skeletal muscle: regenerative potential of skeletal muscle stem cells.

            Skeletal muscle damaged by injury or by degenerative diseases such as muscular dystrophy is able to regenerate new muscle fibers. Regeneration mainly depends upon satellite cells, myogenic progenitors localized between the basal lamina and the muscle fiber membrane. However, other cell types outside the basal lamina, such as pericytes, also have myogenic potency. Here, we discuss the main properties of satellite cells and other myogenic progenitors as well as recent efforts to obtain myogenic cells from pluripotent stem cells for patient-tailored cell therapy. Clinical trials utilizing these cells to treat muscular dystrophies, heart failure, and stress urinary incontinence are also briefly outlined.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Pax3 and Pax7 have distinct and overlapping functions in adult muscle progenitor cells

              The growth and repair of skeletal muscle after birth depends on satellite cells that are characterized by the expression of Pax7. We show that Pax3, the paralogue of Pax7, is also present in both quiescent and activated satellite cells in many skeletal muscles. Dominant-negative forms of both Pax3 and -7 repress MyoD, but do not interfere with the expression of the other myogenic determination factor, Myf5, which, together with Pax3/7, regulates the myogenic differentiation of these cells. In Pax7 mutants, satellite cells are progressively lost in both Pax3-expressing and -nonexpressing muscles. We show that this is caused by satellite cell death, with effects on the cell cycle. Manipulation of the dominant-negative forms of these factors in satellite cell cultures demonstrates that Pax3 cannot replace the antiapoptotic function of Pax7. These findings underline the importance of cell survival in controlling the stem cell populations of adult tissues and demonstrate a role for upstream factors in this context.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Cell Biol
                J. Cell Biol
                jcb
                The Journal of Cell Biology
                The Rockefeller University Press
                0021-9525
                1540-8140
                3 September 2012
                : 198
                : 5
                : 815-832
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1016 , and [2 ]Homologous Recombination Laboratory, Institut Cochin, Paris 75014, France
                [3 ]Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UMR 8104, Paris 75014, France
                [4 ]Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris 75014, France
                [5 ]Institut Pasteur, Department of Developmental Biology, Stem Cells and Development, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique URA 2578, Paris 75015, France
                [6 ]Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Cincinnati, OH 45247
                [7 ]Institute of Developmental Biology and Cancer, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UMR 6543, Université de Nice, Nice 06189, France
                [8 ]The Sprott Centre for Stem Cell Research, Regenerative Medicine Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario K1H8L6, Canada
                Author notes
                Correspondence to Fabien Le Grand: fabien.le-grand@ 123456inserm.fr ; or Pascal Maire: pascal.maire@ 123456inserm.fr

                R. Grifone’s present address is Developmental Biology Laboratory, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Sorbonne Universités, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UMR 7622, Paris, France.

                Article
                201201050
                10.1083/jcb.201201050
                3432771
                22945933
                1a8f1734-977d-43b1-94d1-7658084f881b
                © 2012 Le Grand et al.

                This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/).

                History
                : 10 January 2012
                : 3 August 2012
                Categories
                Research Articles
                Article

                Cell biology
                Cell biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article