13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Induced plant defences in biological control of arthropod pests: a double‐edged sword

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Biological control is an important ecosystem service delivered by natural enemies. Together with breeding for plant defence, it constitutes one of the most promising alternatives to pesticides for controlling herbivores in sustainable crop production. Especially induced plant defences may be promising targets in plant breeding for resistance against arthropod pests. Because they are activated upon herbivore damage, costs are only incurred when defence is needed. Moreover, they can be more specific than constitutive defences. Nevertheless, inducible defence traits that are harming plant pest organisms may interfere with biological control agents, such as predators and parasitoids. Despite the vast fundamental knowledge on plant defence mechanisms and their effects on natural enemies, our understanding of the feasibility of combining biological control with induced plant defence in practice is relatively poor. In this review, we focus on arthropod pest control and present the most important features of biological control with natural enemies and of induced plant defence. Furthermore, we show potential synergies and conflicts among them and, finally, identify gaps and list opportunities for their combined use in crop protection. We suggest that breeders should focus on inducible resistance traits that are compatible with the natural enemies of arthropod pests, specifically traits that help communities of natural enemies to build up. © 2017 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

          Related collections

          Most cited references107

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture.

          Many agroecosystems are unfavorable environments for natural enemies due to high levels of disturbance. Habitat management, a form of conservation biological control, is an ecologically based approach aimed at favoring natural enemies and enhancing biological control in agricultural systems. The goal of habitat management is to create a suitable ecological infrastructure within the agricultural landscape to provide resources such as food for adult natural enemies, alternative prey or hosts, and shelter from adverse conditions. These resources must be integrated into the landscape in a way that is spatially and temporally favorable to natural enemies and practical for producers to implement. The rapidly expanding literature on habitat management is reviewed with attention to practices for favoring predators and parasitoids, implementation of habitat management, and the contributions of modeling and ecological theory to this developing area of conservation biological control. The potential to integrate the goals of habitat management for natural enemies and nature conservation is discussed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The use of push-pull strategies in integrated pest management.

            Push-pull strategies involve the behavioral manipulation of insect pests and their natural enemies via the integration of stimuli that act to make the protected resource unattractive or unsuitable to the pests (push) while luring them toward an attractive source (pull) from where the pests are subsequently removed. The push and pull components are generally nontoxic. Therefore, the strategies are usually integrated with methods for population reduction, preferably biological control. Push-pull strategies maximize efficacy of behavior-manipulating stimuli through the additive and synergistic effects of integrating their use. By orchestrating a predictable distribution of pests, efficiency of population-reducing components can also be increased. The strategy is a useful tool for integrated pest management programs reducing pesticide input. We describe the principles of the strategy, list the potential components, and present case studies reviewing work on the development and use of push-pull strategies in each of the major areas of pest control.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Airborne signals prime plants against insect herbivore attack.

              Green leafy volatiles (GLV), six-carbon aldehydes, alcohols, and esters commonly emitted by plants in response to mechanical damage or herbivory, induced intact undamaged corn seedlings to rapidly produce jasmonic acid (JA) and emit sesquiterpenes. More importantly, corn seedlings previously exposed to GLV from neighboring plants produced significantly more JA and volatile sesquiterpenes when mechanically damaged and induced with caterpillar regurgitant than seedlings not exposed to GLV. The use of pure synthetic chemicals revealed that (Z)-3-hexenal, (Z)-3-hexen-1-ol, and (Z)-3-hexenyl acetate have nearly identical priming activity. Caterpillar-induced nocturnal volatiles, which are enriched in GLV, also exhibited a strong priming effect, inducing production of larger amounts of JA and release of greater quantities of volatile organic compounds after caterpillar regurgitant application. In contrast, GLV priming did not affect JA production induced by mechanical wounding alone. Thus, GLV specifically prime neighboring plants against impending herbivory by enhancing inducible chemical defense responses triggered during attack and may play a key role in plant-plant signaling and plant-insect interactions.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                mpappa@agro.duth.gr
                Journal
                Pest Manag Sci
                Pest Manag. Sci
                10.1002/(ISSN)1526-4998
                PS
                Pest Management Science
                John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (Chichester, UK )
                1526-498X
                1526-4998
                08 June 2017
                September 2017
                : 73
                : 9 ( doiID: 10.1002/ps.2017.73.issue-9 )
                : 1780-1788
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Democritus University of Thrace, Faculty of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences Department of Agricultural Development Orestiada Greece
                [ 2 ] Utrecht University, Faculty of Science Department of Biology, Plant − Microbe Interactions Utrecht The Netherlands
                [ 3 ] University of Amsterdam Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, Section Molecular and Chemical Ecology Amsterdam The Netherlands
                [ 4 ] Wageningen UR Greenhouse Horticulture Bleiswijk The Netherlands
                [ 5 ] Freie Universität Berlin Institute of Biology, Molecular Ecology, Dahlem Centre of Plant Sciences Berlin Germany
                [ 6 ] Biobest Westerlo Belgium
                [ 7 ] Lancaster University Lancaster Environment Centre UK
                [ 8 ] German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Leipzig Germany
                [ 9 ] Friedrich Schiller University Jena Institute of Ecology Jena Germany
                Author notes
                [*] [* ]Correspondence to: ML Pappas, Democritus University of Thrace, Faculty of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Department of Agricultural Development, Pantazidou 193, 68200 Orestiada, Greece. E‐mail: mpappa@ 123456agro.duth.gr
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4563-3023
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3604-2109
                Article
                PS4587
                10.1002/ps.4587
                5575458
                28387028
                1b8af59a-6464-4504-9928-9ab809b373c7
                © 2017 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 20 November 2016
                : 31 March 2017
                : 31 March 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 0, Pages: 9, Words: 0
                Funding
                Funded by: COST Action FA1105 ‘Towards a sustainable and productive EU organic greenhouse horticulture’
                Funded by: German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv)
                Funded by: German Research Foundation
                Award ID: DFG: FZT 118
                Funded by: Onassis Foundation
                Award ID: R‐ZJ 003
                Funded by: Dutch Technology Foundation STW
                Funded by: Netherlands Organization of Scientific Research
                Award ID: NWO/STW‐VENI Grant 13087
                Funded by: Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research
                Award ID: NWO/ALW‐Meer Met Minder/847.13.005
                Funded by: CRC 973 of the DFG
                Categories
                Review
                Review
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                ps4587
                September 2017
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:5.1.8 mode:remove_FC converted:30.08.2017

                Pests, Diseases & Weeds
                direct defence,indirect defence,integrated pest management,plant resistance,sustainable agriculture

                Comments

                Comment on this article