1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Impact of a resilience-building energy management intervention for people with systemic sclerosis: a mixed methods study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          People with SSc often experience fatigue, which significantly affects daily life functioning and quality of life. We aimed to explore participants’ experiences of a peer health–coached resilience-building energy management to enhance well-being (RENEW) intervention on symptoms and well-being and to use mixed methods to compare how SSc duration influenced the experiences of participants who had clinically significant fatigue improvement vs those who did not.

          Methods

          Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 participants from the parent clinical trial randomized to the RENEW intervention. Data were analysed using the rigorous and accelerated data reduction technique combined with thematic content analysis. A mixed methods approach used a joint display to identify themes related to the impact of SSc duration on fatigue improvement status. Participants were categorized into short/improvement, short/limited improvement, long/improvement, and long/limited improvement.

          Results

          Our team generated four themes: participant and peer health–coach relationship, physical and psychological well-being improvement, need for a tailored approach and easy program access through technology. Mixed methods analysis revealed that, regardless of SSc duration, participants with improved fatigue reported increasing self-awareness of SSc-related symptoms and learning coping strategies to manage fatigue. Participants in the short/improvement group reported preferences for slower pacing of the program and pairing with a coach with similar symptom severity. Participants in the long/limited improvement group sought SSc-specific symptom management information.

          Conclusion

          Incorporating peer health coaches and technology is beneficial for self-management interventions for people with SSc. Future tailoring of RENEW based on SSc duration and symptom severity is needed.

          Clinical trial registration number

          clinicatrials.gov, NCT04908943.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices.

            Mixed methods research offers powerful tools for investigating complex processes and systems in health and health care. This article describes integration principles and practices at three levels in mixed methods research and provides illustrative examples. Integration at the study design level occurs through three basic mixed method designs-exploratory sequential, explanatory sequential, and convergent-and through four advanced frameworks-multistage, intervention, case study, and participatory. Integration at the methods level occurs through four approaches. In connecting, one database links to the other through sampling. With building, one database informs the data collection approach of the other. When merging, the two databases are brought together for analysis. With embedding, data collection and analysis link at multiple points. Integration at the interpretation and reporting level occurs through narrative, data transformation, and joint display. The fit of integration describes the extent the qualitative and quantitative findings cohere. Understanding these principles and practices of integration can help health services researchers leverage the strengths of mixed methods. © Health Research and Educational Trust.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              Systemic sclerosis.

              Systemic sclerosis, also called scleroderma, is an immune-mediated rheumatic disease that is characterised by fibrosis of the skin and internal organs and vasculopathy. Although systemic sclerosis is uncommon, it has a high morbidity and mortality. Improved understanding of systemic sclerosis has allowed better management of the disease, including improved classification and more systematic assessment and follow-up. Additionally, treatments for specific complications have emerged and a growing evidence base supports the use of immune suppression for the treatment of skin and lung fibrosis. Some manifestations of the disease, such as scleroderma renal crisis, pulmonary arterial hypertension, digital ulceration, and gastro-oesophageal reflux, are now treatable. However, the burden of non-lethal complications associated with systemic sclerosis is substantial and is likely to become more of a challenge. Here, we review the clinical features of systemic sclerosis and describe the best practice approaches for its management. Furthermore, we identify future areas for development.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Rheumatol Adv Pract
                Rheumatol Adv Pract
                rheumap
                Rheumatology Advances in Practice
                Oxford University Press
                2514-1775
                2024
                08 March 2024
                08 March 2024
                : 8
                : 2
                : rkae040
                Affiliations
                Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, MI, USA
                Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, MI, USA
                Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, MI, USA
                Rush University Medical Center , Chicago, IL, USA
                Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, MI, USA
                Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, MI, USA
                Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, MI, USA
                Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, MI, USA
                Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, MI, USA
                Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, MI, USA
                Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, MI, USA
                Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, MI, USA
                Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, MI, USA
                Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, MI, USA
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Yen T. Chen, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Drive, Lobby M, Suite 3100, Ann Arbor MI 48105, USA. E-mail: yentchen@ 123456med.umich.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7723-6431
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0623-3879
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1412-4453
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7924-0012
                Article
                rkae040
                10.1093/rap/rkae040
                11015950
                38618141
                3488e61a-8201-4a51-9986-a9259726e8bd
                © The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 11 October 2023
                : 03 March 2024
                : 13 April 2024
                Page count
                Pages: 11
                Funding
                Funded by: Rheumatology Research Foundation Innovative Research Award;
                Funded by: US Department of Health and Human Services;
                Award ID: 90DPHF0004
                Funded by: University of Michigan’s Advanced Rehabilitation;
                Categories
                Original Article
                Clinical Science
                AcademicSubjects/MED00010

                systemic sclerosis,fatigue,symptom management,peer health coach,resilience,well-being,mixed methods study

                Comments

                Comment on this article