3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      RNA-Based Multiplexing Assay for Routine Testing of Fusion and Splicing Variants in Cytological Samples of NSCLC Patients

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The detection of ALK receptor tyrosine kinase (ALK), ROS proto-oncogen1, receptor tyrosine kinase (ROS1), ret proto-oncogen (RET), and MET proto-oncogen exon 14 skipping ( METΔ ex14) allows for the selection of specific kinase inhibitor treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Multiplex technologies are recommended in this setting. We used nCounter, a multiplexed technology based on RNA hybridization, to detect ALK, ROS1, RET, and METΔ ex14 in RNA purified from cytological specimens ( n = 16) and biopsies ( n = 132). Twelve of the 16 cytological samples (75.0%) were evaluable by nCounter compared to 120 out of 132 (90.9%) biopsies. The geometrical mean (geomean) of the housekeeping genes of the nCounter panel, but not the total amount of RNA purified, was significantly higher in biopsies vs. cytological samples. Among cytological samples, we detected ALK ( n = 3), METΔex14 ( n = 1) and very high MET expression ( n = 1) positive cases. The patient with METΔ ex14 had a partial response to tepotinib, one of the patients with ALK fusions was treated with crizotinib with a complete response. Cell blocks and cytological extensions can be successfully used for the detection of fusions and splicing variants using RNA-based methods such as nCounter.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Overall Survival with Osimertinib in Untreated, EGFR-Mutated Advanced NSCLC

          Osimertinib is a third-generation, irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR-TKI) that selectively inhibits both EGFR-TKI-sensitizing and EGFR T790M resistance mutations. A phase 3 trial compared first-line osimertinib with other EGFR-TKIs in patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The trial showed longer progression-free survival with osimertinib than with the comparator EGFR-TKIs (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.46). Data from the final analysis of overall survival have not been reported.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Alectinib versus Crizotinib in Untreated ALK-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

            Background Alectinib, a highly selective inhibitor of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), has shown systemic and central nervous system (CNS) efficacy in the treatment of ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We investigated alectinib as compared with crizotinib in patients with previously untreated, advanced ALK-positive NSCLC, including those with asymptomatic CNS disease. Methods In a randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 303 patients with previously untreated, advanced ALK-positive NSCLC to receive either alectinib (600 mg twice daily) or crizotinib (250 mg twice daily). The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Secondary end points were independent review committee-assessed progression-free survival, time to CNS progression, objective response rate, and overall survival. Results During a median follow-up of 17.6 months (crizotinib) and 18.6 months (alectinib), an event of disease progression or death occurred in 62 of 152 patients (41%) in the alectinib group and 102 of 151 patients (68%) in the crizotinib group. The rate of investigator-assessed progression-free survival was significantly higher with alectinib than with crizotinib (12-month event-free survival rate, 68.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 61.0 to 75.9] with alectinib vs. 48.7% [95% CI, 40.4 to 56.9] with crizotinib; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.34 to 0.65]; P<0.001); the median progression-free survival with alectinib was not reached. The results for independent review committee-assessed progression-free survival were consistent with those for the primary end point. A total of 18 patients (12%) in the alectinib group had an event of CNS progression, as compared with 68 patients (45%) in the crizotinib group (cause-specific hazard ratio, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.28; P<0.001). A response occurred in 126 patients in the alectinib group (response rate, 82.9%; 95% CI, 76.0 to 88.5) and in 114 patients in the crizotinib group (response rate, 75.5%; 95% CI, 67.8 to 82.1) (P=0.09). Grade 3 to 5 adverse events were less frequent with alectinib (41% vs. 50% with crizotinib). Conclusions As compared with crizotinib, alectinib showed superior efficacy and lower toxicity in primary treatment of ALK-positive NSCLC. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche; ALEX ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02075840 .).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Capmatinib in MET Exon 14–Mutated or MET-Amplified Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

              Among patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), MET exon 14 skipping mutations occur in 3 to 4% and MET amplifications occur in 1 to 6%. Capmatinib, a selective inhibitor of the MET receptor, has shown activity in cancer models with various types of MET activation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Diagnostics (Basel)
                Diagnostics (Basel)
                diagnostics
                Diagnostics
                MDPI
                2075-4418
                23 December 2020
                January 2021
                : 11
                : 1
                : 15
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Laboratorio de Oncología, Pangaea Oncology, Hospital Quirón Dexeus, 08028 Barcelona, Spain; caguado@ 123456panoncology.com (C.A.); agimenez@ 123456panoncology.com (A.G.-C.); rroman@ 123456panoncology.com (R.R.); srodriguez@ 123456panoncology.com (S.R.); njordana@ 123456panoncology.com (N.J.-A.)
                [2 ]Instituto Oncológico Dr Rosell, Hospital Quirón Dexeus, 08028 Barcelona, Spain; aaguilar@ 123456oncorosell.com (A.A.); sviteri@ 123456oncorosell.com (S.V.)
                [3 ]Instituto Oncológico Dr. Rosell, Teknon Medical Center, 08022 Barcelona, Spain; ccabrera@ 123456oncorosell.com
                [4 ]Medical Oncology Department, Hospital de Mataró, 08304 Barcelona, Spain; crivas@ 123456csdm.cat (C.R.-C.); plianes@ 123456csdm.cat (P.L.)
                [5 ]Instituto Oncológico Dr. Rosell, Hospital General de Catalunya, 08195 Sant Cugat del Vallès, Spain; imoya@ 123456oncorosell.com
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: mamolina@ 123456panoncology.com ; Tel.: +34-935460140
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9077-0444
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7572-1123
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8866-9881
                Article
                diagnostics-11-00015
                10.3390/diagnostics11010015
                7824402
                33374879
                42dac689-178b-41e5-9a20-b8df58bad39a
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 05 November 2020
                : 18 December 2020
                Categories
                Article

                cytology,ncounter,nsclc
                cytology, ncounter, nsclc

                Comments

                Comment on this article