10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      In silico prediction of pesticide aquatic toxicity with chemical category approaches

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Herein, six machine learning methods combined with nine fingerprints were used to predict aquatic toxicity of pesticides.

          Abstract

          Aquatic toxicity is an important issue in pesticide development. In this study, using nine molecular fingerprints to describe pesticides, binary and ternary classification models were constructed to predict aquatic toxicity of pesticides via six machine learning methods: Naïve Bayes (NB), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), k-Nearest Neighbor (kNN), Classification Tree (CT), Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine (SVM). For the binary models, local models were obtained with 829 pesticides on rainbow trout (RT) and 151 pesticides on lepomis (LP), and global models were constructed on the basis of 1258 diverse pesticides on RT and LP and 278 on other fish species. After analyzing the local binary models, we found that fish species caused influence in terms of accuracy. Considering the data size and predictive range, the 1258 pesticides were also used to build global ternary models. The best local binary models were Maccs_ANN for RT and Maccs_SVM for LP, which exhibited accuracies of 0.90 and 0.90, respectively. For global binary models, the best model was Graph_SVM with an accuracy of 0.89. Accuracy of the best global ternary model Graph_SVM was 0.81, which was a little lower than that of the best global binary model. In addition, several substructural alerts were identified including nitrobenzene, chloroalkene and nitrile, which could significantly correlate with pesticide aquatic toxicity. This study provides a useful tool for an early evaluation of pesticide aquatic toxicity in environmental risk assessment.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Estimation of ADME properties with substructure pattern recognition.

          Over the past decade, absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) property evaluation has become one of the most important issues in the process of drug discovery and development. Since in vivo and in vitro evaluations are costly and laborious, in silico techniques had been widely used to estimate ADME properties of chemical compounds. Traditional prediction methods usually try to build a functional relationship between a set of molecular descriptors and a given ADME property. Although traditional methods have been successfully used in many cases, the accuracy and efficiency of molecular descriptors must be concerned. Herein, we report a new classification method based on substructure pattern recognition, in which each molecule is represented as a substructure pattern fingerprint based on a predefined substructure dictionary, and then a support vector machine (SVM) algorithm is applied to build the prediction model. Therefore, a direct connection between substructures and molecular properties is built. The most important substructure patterns can be identified via the information gain analysis, which could help to interpret the models from a medicinal chemistry perspective. Afterward, this method was verified with two data sets, one for blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetration and the other for human intestinal absorption (HIA). The results demonstrated that the overall predictive accuracies of the best HIA model for the training and test sets were 98.5 and 98.8%, and the overall predictive accuracies of the best BBB model for the training and test sets were 98.8 and 98.4%, which confirmed the reliability of our method. In the additional validations, the predictive accuracies were 94 and 69.5% for the HIA and the BBB models, respectively. Moreover, some of the representative key substructure patterns which significantly correlated with the HIA and BBB penetration properties were also presented.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Does rational selection of training and test sets improve the outcome of QSAR modeling?

            Prior to using a quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) model for external predictions, its predictive power should be established and validated. In the absence of a true external data set, the best way to validate the predictive ability of a model is to perform its statistical external validation. In statistical external validation, the overall data set is divided into training and test sets. Commonly, this splitting is performed using random division. Rational splitting methods can divide data sets into training and test sets in an intelligent fashion. The purpose of this study was to determine whether rational division methods lead to more predictive models compared to random division. A special data splitting procedure was used to facilitate the comparison between random and rational division methods. For each toxicity end point, the overall data set was divided into a modeling set (80% of the overall set) and an external evaluation set (20% of the overall set) using random division. The modeling set was then subdivided into a training set (80% of the modeling set) and a test set (20% of the modeling set) using rational division methods and by using random division. The Kennard-Stone, minimal test set dissimilarity, and sphere exclusion algorithms were used as the rational division methods. The hierarchical clustering, random forest, and k-nearest neighbor (kNN) methods were used to develop QSAR models based on the training sets. For kNN QSAR, multiple training and test sets were generated, and multiple QSAR models were built. The results of this study indicate that models based on rational division methods generate better statistical results for the test sets than models based on random division, but the predictive power of both types of models are comparable.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Screening method for ecotoxicological hazard assessment of 42 pharmaceuticals considering human metabolism and excretory routes.

              We assessed the ecotoxicological hazard potential of 42 pharmaceuticals from 22 therapeutic groups, including metabolites formed in humans. We treated each parent drug and its metabolites as a mixture of similarly acting compounds. If physicochemical or effect literature data were missing, we estimated these with quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR). Additionally, we estimated micropollutant removal efficiency of urine source separation using pharmaceutical information. On average, 50% of a parent drug was metabolized, and 70% was excreted with urine, albeit with large variations among drugs. Metabolism reduced the toxic potential of all but eight drugs. The subsequently modeled risk quotient was mostly below the threshold of one. However, ibuprofen and its metabolites in a mixture could pose an ecotoxicologal risk; and possibly also acetylsalicylic acid, bezafibrate, carbamazepine, diclofenac, fenofibrate, and paracetamol. Lipophilicity and sale quantities of parent drugs alone were insufficient to estimate their ecotoxicological risk. Urine separation could decrease the ecotoxicological risk of some, but not all drugs. The estimated risk quotients were equal in urine and feces, again with large variations among compounds. Because of scientific limitations of the model and inconsistent literature data the results are somewhat uncertain. However, this new approach allows first tier screening of single drugs, thus supporting decision-making.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                TROEE8
                Toxicology Research
                Toxicol. Res.
                Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
                2045-452X
                2045-4538
                2017
                2017
                : 6
                : 6
                : 831-842
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Shanghai Key Laboratory of New Drug Design
                [2 ]School of Pharmacy
                [3 ]East China University of Science and Technology
                [4 ]Shanghai 200237
                [5 ]China
                Article
                10.1039/C7TX00144D
                6062408
                30090546
                523a2f51-e965-49cd-8fe3-6380fe2f8821
                © 2017
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article