16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effect of Different Additives on Genotoxicity of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction Introduction: The aim of the present in vitro study was to evaluate the genotoxicity of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) after adding different concentrations of disodium hydrogen phosphate and silver nanoparticles using the Ames test. Methods and Materials: TA100 strain of Salmonella typhimurium was used to evaluate mutagenicity of experimental materials with and without S9 mix fraction. The materials tested in this study consisted of MTA, MTA/disodium hydrogen phosphate and MTA/silver nanoparticles at 0.1, 0.01, 0.001 and 0.0001 concentrations. Negative and positive control groups consisted of 1% dimethyl sulfoxide and sodium azide with 2-aminoanthracene, respectively. The number of colonies per plate was determined. If the ratio of the number of histidine-revertant colonies to spontaneous revertants of the negative control colonies was ≥2, the material was regarded a mutagenic agent. Results: In all the concentrations of the three tested materials, the Ames test failed to detect mutations. Conclusion: Under the limitations of the present study, MTA/disodium hydrogen phosphate and MTA/silver nanoparticles were biocompatible in relation to mutagenicity. Introduction Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) is a calcium silicate-based biomaterial and is widely used in endodontics due to its favorable properties, including sealing ability [1], setting capacity in the presence of blood/moisture [2] bio-compatibility [3, 4], and the ability to induce regeneration in the pulp and periapical tissues [5]. Its applications in endodontics include as a pulp covering agent, as an apical plug/root-end fillings and as a perforation repair biomaterial. However, MTA has a long setting time and its handling is difficult [6]. Some studies have shown its poor antimicrobial properties against resistant bacteria such as Enterococcus faecalis [7]. Several studies have evaluated and suggested different strategies to improve the properties of MTA. One strategy is to incorporate ingredients into MTA to decrease its setting time. Disodium hydrogen phosphate is a buffering agent which has an effect on decreasing the setting time of MTA [8, 9]. Due to the antibacterial properties of silver nanoparticles, they have been incorporated into MTA [10]. These particles have a high surface-to-volume ratio and when added in small amounts interfere with peptidoglycans of bacterial cell wall and increase their permeability. In addition, they react with the sulfhydryl groups of bacterial proteins and prevent DNA replication, resulting in bacterial death [11]. When ingredients are incorporated into a biomaterial to improve its properties, important factors that should be taken into account are the cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of the final product [12]. Studies on the cytotoxicity of MTA after incorporation of disodium hydrogen phosphate have shown its biocompatibility [13-15]. In addition, incorporation of silver nanoparticles at 1 wt% and at 23-47 ppm concentrations has resulted in tissue reactions similar to those mounted to MTA alone; i.e. the resultant material has been shown to be biocompatible [10, 16]. Also, due to the results reported by Li et al. [17], the Ames was negative regarding the genotoxicity of silver nanoparticles and suggested that this result can be due to the inability of these nanoparticles to penetrate the bacterial cell wall. No study is available on the genotoxicity of MTA after incorporation of disodium hydrogen phosphate and silver nanoparticles. Genotoxicity is defined as the induction of gene damage, gene mutation and chromosomal breakage. Of all the tests that evaluate genotoxicity, those that evaluate gene mutations are very reliable. The Salmonella typhimurium assay or Ames test is a bacterial test widely used to determine the potency of substances that can produce genetic damage and gene mutations [18, 19]. The Ames test utilizes Salmonella strains with preexisting mutations that are unable to synthesize the required amino acid, histidine, and therefore cannot grow and form colonies in the medium devoid of histidine. New mutations at the site of these preexisting mutations can restore the genes’ function and allow the cells to synthesize histidine. These newly mutated cells can grow in the absence of histidine and form colonies. The Salmonella mutagenicity test was specifically designed to detect chemically induced mutagenesis [20, 21]. The aim of the present in vitro study was to evaluate the genotoxicity of MTA, MTA/disodium hydrogen phosphate and MTA/silver nanoparticles using Ames test. Materials and Methods In this study, TA100 strain of Salmonella typhimurium was used in order to investigate mutagenicity of MTA (Angelus Dental Industry Products, Londrina, Brazil), MTA/silver nanoparticles (produced in the laboratory)[21], and MTA/disodium hydrogen phosphate (Merck, Darmstad, Germany) with and without S9 mix fraction. MTA, MTA/silver nanoparticles (average nanoparticle size of 20 nm) and MTA/disodium hydrogen phosphate were prepared at 0.1, 0.01, 0.001 and 0.0001 concentrations [21]. The Salmonella typhimurium bacterial strain used in the Ames test carried a mutant gene preventing it from synthesizing the essential amino acid histidine from the ingredients found in the standard bacterial culture medium. In this study, negative and positive control groups were included to assess the accuracy of the tests. The negative control group consisted of 1% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and distilled water. The positive control group, used to compare the results, consisted of sodium azide (0.5 µg/plate) and 2-aminoanthracene (2.5 µg/plate) as strong mutagenic agents in the absence of metabolic and metabolic activation systems. The TA100 strain of Salmonella typhimurium was cultured overnight in nutrient broth. Different concentrations of the test materials were prepared in a histidine-free medium. Glucose minimal (GM) agar plate consisted of distilled water, agar, Vogel-Bonner (VB) salt solution and glucose solution (10% v/v). VB salt medium consisted of warm distilled water, magnesium sulfate, citric acid monohydrate, potassium phosphate dibasic anhydrous, and sodium ammonium phosphate. Before the incubation, each test material and Salmonella typhimurium (50 µl) were incorporated into 2 mL of top agar containing distilled water, agar, sodium chloride and histidine/biotin solution (0.5 mM). The mixture was poured on GM agar plates. After solidification of the superficial agar, the plates were incubated at 37°C for 48 to 72 h. After proliferation of bacteria on the glucose-minimal agar plate, the histidine-revertant clones were counted using a colony counter. Rat liver enzymes (S9) were used as a metabolic activator. The microsomal enzyme system was induced by phenobarbital in rats and the rat liver was homogenized after 7 days in order to isolate the enzyme. A suspension of Salmonella typhimurium with a mixture of rat liver enzymes (S9 mix) and different cofactors, such as glucose-6 phosphate and NADP, were added to the superficial agar. Subsequently, the plates were incubated for 48 to 72 h in 37°C without shaking. Then the number of colonies was counted per plate. The ratio of the number of histidine-revertant colonies to spontaneous revertants of the negative control colonies was obtained; if the ratio was ≥2, the experimental material was considered as a mutagenic agent. Results Table 1 presents the number of initial and secondary colonies and their ratios (S9+/S9-). In all experimental groups and at all the concentrations these ratios were <2; therefore, there was no genotoxicity and there was no need for statistical analysis. The findings of positive and negative controls were as expected in the present study. Discussion In this in vitro study, the genotoxicity of different concentrations of MTA/silver nanoparticles and MTA/disodium hydrogen phosphate was evaluated, using Ames test. The results showed the safety of these materials in relation to genotoxicity. MTA is a silicate-based cement with numerous therapeutic applications in endodontics. Efforts have always been made to achieve favorable clinical outcomes by improving the physicochemical properties of MTA [22, 23]. Some studies have been undertaken in an attempt to decrease its setting time and increase its antimicrobial activity, which are prerequisites for achieving favorable treatment outcomes. In this context, some materials have been incorporated into the MTA powder. One of the materials incorporated into the MTA composition was disodium hydrogen phosphate. Based on the results of previous studies, incorporation of this material into MTA results in a decrease in setting time, in an increase in tensile strength and in an increase in push-out bond strength; however, the setting pH is not affected [8, 9, 13, 24]. Studies on the cytotoxicity of this composition have reported it to be biocompatible [14, 15, 25]. Previous studies have used 2.5 and 15 wt% of disodium hydrogen phosphate [8, 26], which is different from the present study (100-200 ppm and %1 weight) and it has been recommended that future studies on the genotoxicity of MTA be carried out by incorporating these weight percentages of disodium hydrogen phosphate. Silver ions have drawn attention in the medical field as significant antimicrobial agents. Silver nanoparticles exhibit less toxicity compared to silver ions due to their small size and high surface-to-volume ratio at a similar concentration, with antimicrobial activity comparable to that of silver ions [10, 16]. Studies have shown that incorporation of silver nanoparticles (100-200 ppm and %1 weight) into MTA results in an increase in their antibacterial activity against E. faecalis and C. albicans [11, 27], which are microorganisms resistant to antimicrobial agents and are found in the majority of cases of endodontic failures [28-30]. Silver is a toxic agent and its toxicity is concentration-dependent [23]. Previous studies have shown that concentrations of 23-47 ppm are safe. In addition, incorporation of silver nanoparticles into MTA at 1 wt% did not result in a significant difference in the inflammatory reactions induced in rat connective tissue compared to pure MTA [15]. In the present study, incorporation of silver nanoparticles at weight percentages mentioned above did not result in genotoxicity. Table 1 Mean revertant colony counts after exposure to four concentrations of test materials with and without S9 mix fraction Experimental materials Colony counts of TA100 Ratio of TA 100 S9+ S9- S9+ S9- MTA 0.1 250 335 0.8 0.7 0.01 58 11 0.1 0.6 0.001 85 200 0.2 0.5 0.0001 60 250 0.1 1.45 MTA/NaHPO 4 0.1 53 0 0.18 0.7 0.01 83 200 0.2 0.6 0.001 350 650 1 0.5 0.0001 395 200 1.27 1.45 MTA/Silver nanoparticles 0.1 400 405 1.3 0.8 0.01 3 43 0.2 0.07 0.001 80 660 0.2 1.8 0.0001 NA NA NA NA In many studies, the biocompatibility of silver nanoparticles and disodium hydrogen phosphate was evaluated by placing their implants in the subcutaneous tissues of rats or in exposure with cells in the cultures media; the histological cross-sections showed the safety of these materials [12-15, 25]. However, the genotoxicity and mutation induction capacity of these materials have not been evaluated to date. Ames test was used in the present study to evaluate the genotoxicity of these materials. In the design of this test, changes are induced in the genome area of Salmonella responsible for production of histidine. Therefore, these mutagenic strains cannot proliferate in an environment without histidine; however, if a material has mutagenic activity, it can result in the repair of the iatrogenic defect in the bacterial genome and the bacteria will be able to synthesize histidine again and will be able to proliferate in the culture medium. If the ratio of these new colonies to the initial colonies is ≥2, the material is considered to be mutagenic [20, 21]. In the present study, this test was used and none of the materials was shown to be mutagenic. Conclusion Based on the results of the present in vitro study, MTA/silver nanoparticles and MTA/disodium hydrogen phosphate had no genotoxicity at the concentrations used.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Ames Salmonella/microsome mutagenicity assay.

          The Ames Salmonella/microsome mutagenicity assay (Salmonella test; Ames test) is a short-term bacterial reverse mutation assay specifically designed to detect a wide range of chemical substances that can produce genetic damage that leads to gene mutations. The test employs several histidine dependent Salmonella strains each carrying different mutations in various genes in the histidine operon. These mutations act as hot spots for mutagens that cause DNA damage via different mechanisms. When the Salmonella tester strains are grown on a minimal media agar plate containing a trace of histidine, only those bacteria that revert to histidine independence (his(+)) are able to form colonies. The number of spontaneously induced revertant colonies per plate is relatively constant. However, when a mutagen is added to the plate, the number of revertant colonies per plate is increased, usually in a dose-related manner. The Ames test is used world-wide as an initial screen to determine the mutagenic potential of new chemicals and drugs. The test is also used for submission of data to regulatory agencies for registration or acceptance of many chemicals, including drugs and biocides. International guidelines have been developed for use by corporations and testing laboratories to ensure uniformity of testing procedures. This review provides historical aspects of how the Ames was developed and detailed procedures for performing the test, including the design and interpretation of results.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Silver Nanoparticles in Dental Biomaterials

            Silver has been used in medicine for centuries because of its antimicrobial properties. More recently, silver nanoparticles have been synthesized and incorporated into several biomaterials, since their small size provides great antimicrobial effect, at low filler level. Hence, these nanoparticles have been applied in dentistry, in order to prevent or reduce biofilm formation over dental materials surfaces. This review aims to discuss the current progress in this field, highlighting aspects regarding silver nanoparticles incorporation, such as antimicrobial potential, mechanical properties, cytotoxicity, and long-term effectiveness. We also emphasize the need for more studies to determine the optimal concentration of silver nanoparticle and its release over time.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Genotoxicity of silver nanoparticles evaluated using the Ames test and in vitro micronucleus assay.

              Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) have antimicrobial properties, which have contributed to their widespread use in consumer products. A current issue regarding nanomaterials is the extent to which existing genotoxicity assays are useful for evaluating the risks associated with their use. In this study, the genotoxicity of 5 nm AgNPs was assessed using two standard genotoxicity assays, the Salmonella reverse mutation assay (Ames test) and the in vitro micronucleus assay. Using the preincubation version of the Ames assay, Salmonella strains TA102, TA100, TA1537, TA98, and TA1535 were treated with 0.15-76.8 μg/plate of the AgNPs. Toxicity limited the doses that could be assayed to 2.4-38.4 μg/plate; no increases in mutant frequency over the vehicle control were found for the concentrations that could be assayed. Human lymphoblastoid TK6 cells were treated with 10-30 μg/ml AgNPs, and additional cells were treated with water and 0.73 gy X-rays as vehicle and positive controls. Micronucleus frequency was increased by the AgNP treatment in a dose-dependent manner. At a concentration of 30 μg/ml (with 45.4% relative population doubling), AgNPs induced a significant, 3.17-fold increase with a net increase of 1.60% in micronucleus frequency over the vehicle control, a weak positive response by our criteria. These results demonstrate that the 5 nm AgNP are genotoxic in TK6 cells. Also, the data suggest that the in vitro micronucleus assay may be more appropriate than the Ames test for evaluating the genotoxicity of the AgNPs. Published by Elsevier B.V.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Iran Endod J
                Iran Endod J
                IEJ
                Iranian Endodontic Journal
                Iranian Center for Endodontic Research (Tehran, Iran )
                1735-7497
                2008-2746
                Winter 2018
                : 13
                : 1
                : 37-41
                Affiliations
                [a ] Department of Endodontics, Dental School, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran;
                [b ] Department of Endodontics, Dental and Periodontal Research Center, Dental School, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran;
                [c ] Department of Medicinal Chemistry, School of Pharmacy, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran;
                [d ] Department of Genetic, Biotechnology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran;
                [e ] Iranian Center for Endodontic Research, Research Institute of Dental Sciences, Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author: Negin Ghasemi, Gholghasht Street, Dental Faculty, Department of Endodontics Iran, Tabriz.Tel: +98-914 3063283,E-mail: neginghasemi64@gmail.com
                Article
                10.22037/iej.v13i1.16913
                5800439
                29692833
                65156509-9141-4a4f-b432-b4d015a500ce

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 2 June 2017
                : 10 October 2017
                : 28 October 2017
                Categories
                Original Article

                Dentistry
                ames test,disodium hydrogen phosphate,genotoxicity,mineral trioxide aggregate,nano silver

                Comments

                Comment on this article