54
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Cohesin’s DNA Exit Gate Is Distinct from Its Entrance Gate and Is Regulated by Acetylation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Sister chromatid cohesion is mediated by entrapment of sister DNAs by a tripartite ring composed of cohesin’s Smc1, Smc3, and α-kleisin subunits. Cohesion requires acetylation of Smc3 by Eco1, whose role is to counteract an inhibitory (antiestablishment) activity associated with cohesin’s Wapl subunit. We show that mutations abrogating antiestablishment activity also reduce turnover of cohesin on pericentric chromatin. Our results reveal a “releasing” activity inherent to cohesin complexes transiently associated with Wapl that catalyzes their dissociation from chromosomes. Fusion of Smc3’s nucleotide binding domain to α-kleisin’s N-terminal domain also reduces cohesin turnover within pericentric chromatin and permits establishment of Wapl-resistant cohesion in the absence of Eco1. We suggest that releasing activity opens the Smc3/α-kleisin interface, creating a DNA exit gate distinct from its proposed entry gate at the Smc1/3 interface. According to this notion, the function of Smc3 acetylation is to block its dissociation from α-kleisin. The functional implications of regulated ring opening are discussed.

          Abstract

          Graphical Abstract

          Highlights

          ► Yeast cohesin releases DNA through a releasing activity associated with its subunits ► DNA escapes from cohesin via the opening Smc3/kleisin interface ► Eco1-mediated Smc3 acetylation blocks releasing activity ► Cohesin ring has separate gates for DNA entry and exit

          Abstract

          Cohesin rings entrap and then release sister chromatids using conformational changes in distinct ring subunits to create the entrance and exit sites.

          Related collections

          Most cited references48

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Cohesins: chromosomal proteins that prevent premature separation of sister chromatids.

          Cohesion between sister chromatids opposes the splitting force exerted by microtubules, and loss of this cohesion is responsible for the subsequent separation of sister chromatids during anaphase. We describe three chromosmal proteins that prevent premature separation of sister chromatids in yeast. Two, Smc1p and Smc3p, are members of the SMC family, which are putative ATPases with coiled-coil domains. A third protein, which we call Scc1p, binds to chromosomes during S phase, dissociates from them at the metaphase-to-anaphase transition, and is degraded by the anaphase promoting complex. Association of Scc1p with chromatin depends on Smc1p. Proteins homologous to Scc1p exist in a variety of eukaryotic organisms including humans. A common cohesion apparatus might be used by all eukaryotic cells during both mitosis and meiosis.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cohesin mediates transcriptional insulation by CCCTC-binding factor.

            Cohesin complexes mediate sister-chromatid cohesion in dividing cells but may also contribute to gene regulation in postmitotic cells. How cohesin regulates gene expression is not known. Here we describe cohesin-binding sites in the human genome and show that most of these are associated with the CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF), a zinc-finger protein required for transcriptional insulation. CTCF is dispensable for cohesin loading onto DNA, but is needed to enrich cohesin at specific binding sites. Cohesin enables CTCF to insulate promoters from distant enhancers and controls transcription at the H19/IGF2 (insulin-like growth factor 2) locus. This role of cohesin seems to be independent of its role in cohesion. We propose that cohesin functions as a transcriptional insulator, and speculate that subtle deficiencies in this function contribute to 'cohesinopathies' such as Cornelia de Lange syndrome.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Cohesins functionally associate with CTCF on mammalian chromosome arms.

              Cohesins mediate sister chromatid cohesion, which is essential for chromosome segregation and postreplicative DNA repair. In addition, cohesins appear to regulate gene expression and enhancer-promoter interactions. These noncanonical functions remained unexplained because knowledge of cohesin-binding sites and functional interactors in metazoans was lacking. We show that the distribution of cohesins on mammalian chromosome arms is not driven by transcriptional activity, in contrast to S. cerevisiae. Instead, mammalian cohesins occupy a subset of DNase I hypersensitive sites, many of which contain sequence motifs resembling the consensus for CTCF, a DNA-binding protein with enhancer blocking function and boundary-element activity. We find cohesins at most CTCF sites and show that CTCF is required for cohesin localization to these sites. Recruitment by CTCF suggests a rationale for noncanonical cohesin functions and, because CTCF binding is sensitive to DNA methylation, allows cohesin positioning to integrate DNA sequence and epigenetic state.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cell
                Cell
                Cell
                Cell Press
                0092-8674
                1097-4172
                31 August 2012
                31 August 2012
                : 150
                : 5
                : 961-974
                Affiliations
                [1 ]University of Oxford, Department of Biochemistry, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author kim.nasmyth@ 123456bioch.ox.ac.uk
                [2]

                These authors contributed equally to this work

                Article
                CELL6418
                10.1016/j.cell.2012.07.028
                3485559
                22901742
                8843e3f4-e620-4728-bd40-f2ca9859be3c
                © 2012 ELL & Excerpta Medica.

                This document may be redistributed and reused, subject to certain conditions.

                History
                : 10 February 2012
                : 27 April 2012
                : 2 July 2012
                Categories
                Article

                Cell biology
                Cell biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article