23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      In vivo characterization of rate-dependent impact on the QT interval of microminipig assessed by atrial electrical pacing: Development of correction formulae of QT interval

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Correction formulae of QT interval were developed for the halothane-anesthetized microminipigs by adopting atrial pacing (n=5), which were compared with Bazett’s and Fridericia’s formulae for humans, and Van de Water’s one for dogs. The correction formulae: QTc=QT−0.2072 (RR−750) as linear and QTc=QT/(RR/750) 0.4007 as non-linear equations, were developed for microminipigs. These formulae can better correct the QT interval of the microminipigs compared with each of the conventional ones for humans and dogs. Moreover, analysis of the slope constant α values indicates that the rate-dependent change in the ventricular repolarization period of microminipig may better mimic that of humans than that of dogs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          An analysis of the time-relations of electrocardiogram

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            An improved method for adjusting the QT interval for heart rate (the Framingham Heart Study)

            Several formulas have been proposed to adjust the QT interval for heart rate, the most commonly used being the QT correction formula (QTc = QT/square root of RR) proposed in 1920 by Bazett. The QTc formula was derived from observations in only 39 young subjects. Recently, the adequacy of Bazett's formula has been questioned. To evaluate the heart rate QT association, the QT interval was measured on the initial baseline electrocardiogram of 5,018 subjects (2,239 men and 2,779 women) from the Framingham Heart Study with a mean age of 44 years (range 28 to 62). Persons with coronary artery disease were excluded. A linear regression model was developed for correcting QT according to RR cycle length. The large sample allowed for subdivision of the population into sex-specific deciles of RR intervals and for comparison of QT, Bazett's QTc and linear corrected QT (QTLC). The mean RR interval was 0.81 second (range 0.5 to 1.47) heart rate 74 beats/min (range 41 to 120), and mean QT was 0.35 second (range 0.24 to 0.49) in men and 0.36 second (range 0.26 to 0.48) in women. The linear regression model yielded a correction formula (for a reference RR interval of 1 second): QTLC = QT + 0.154 (1-RR) that applies for men and women. This equation corrects QT more reliably than the Bazett's formula, which overcorrects the QT interval at fast heart rates and undercorrects it at low heart rates. Lower and upper limits of normal QT values in relation to RR were generated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The duration of systole in an electrocardiogram in normal humans and in patients with heart disease. 1920.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Vet Med Sci
                J. Vet. Med. Sci
                JVMS
                The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science
                The Japanese Society of Veterinary Science
                0916-7250
                1347-7439
                14 October 2019
                December 2019
                : 81
                : 12
                : 1735-1739
                Affiliations
                [1) ]Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Toho University, 5-21-16 Omori-nishi, Ota-ku, Tokyo 143-8540, Japan
                [2) ]Division of Cellular Physiology, Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Toho University, 5-21-16 Omori-nishi, Ota-ku, Tokyo 143-8540, Japan
                [3) ]Department of Aging Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Toho University, 5-21-16 Omori-nishi, Ota-ku, Tokyo 143-8540, Japan
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence to: Sugiyama, A.: atsushi.sugiyama@ 123456med.toho-u.ac.jp
                Article
                19-0252
                10.1292/jvms.19-0252
                6943312
                31611491
                8e71feb1-aadc-4882-8355-ab5084d2fc19
                ©2019 The Japanese Society of Veterinary Science

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ )

                History
                : 09 May 2019
                : 03 October 2019
                Categories
                Laboratory Animal Science
                Note

                correction formula,microminipig,qtc
                correction formula, microminipig, qtc

                Comments

                Comment on this article