6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Association of Healthful Plant-based Diet Adherence With Risk of Mortality and Major Chronic Diseases Among Adults in the UK

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          Question

          Is adherence to a healthful plant-based diet associated with a lower risk of mortality and chronic disease among UK adults?

          Findings

          In this cohort study with 126 394 UK Biobank participants, greater adherence to a healthful plant-based diet was associated with a lower risk of mortality, cancer, and particularly cardiovascular disease. Opposing associations with higher risk were observed for individuals who adhered to an unhealthy plant-based diet.

          Meaning

          The findings of this study suggest that a healthful plant-based diet that is low in animal foods, sugary drinks, snacks and desserts, refined grains, potatoes, and fruit juices was associated with a lower risk of mortality and major chronic diseases among adults in the UK.

          Abstract

          This cohort study examines the association of healthful plant-based diet adherence with lower risk of mortality and major chronic diseases among UK adults.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Plant-based diets have gained popularity for both environmental and health reasons, but a comprehensive assessment of their quality in relation to risk of mortality and major chronic diseases is lacking.

          Objective

          To examine whether healthful vs unhealthful plant-based dietary patterns are associated with mortality and major chronic diseases among UK adults.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This prospective cohort study used data from adults in the UK Biobank, a large-scale population-based study. Participants were recruited between 2006 and 2010 and followed up using record linkage data until 2021; follow-up for different outcomes ranged between 10.6 and 12.2 years. Data analysis was conducted from November 2021 to October 2022.

          Exposures

          Adherence to a healthful vs unhealthful plant-based diet index (hPDI vs uPDI) derived from 24-hour dietary assessments.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          The main outcomes were hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs of mortality (overall and cause specific), cardiovascular disease (CVD [total, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and hemorrhagic stroke]), cancer (total, breast, prostate, and colorectal), and fracture (total, vertebrae, and hip) across quartiles of hPDI and uPDI adherence.

          Results

          This study included 126 394 UK Biobank participants. They had a mean (SD) age of 56.1 (7.8) years; 70 618 (55.9%) were women. The majority of participants (115 371 [91.3%]) were White. Greater adherence to the hPDI was associated with lower risks of total mortality, cancer, and CVD, with HRs (95% CIs) of 0.84 (0.78-0.91), 0.93 (0.88-0.99), and 0.92 (0.86-0.99), respectively, for participants in the highest hPDI quartile compared with the lowest. The hPDI was also associated with lower risks of myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke, with HRs (95% CIs) of 0.86 (0.78-0.95) and 0.84 (0.71-0.99), respectively. By contrast, higher uPDI scores were associated with higher risks of mortality, CVD, and cancer. The associations observed did not show heterogeneity across strata of sex, smoking status, body mass index, or socioeconomic status or with polygenic risk scores (specifically with regard to CVD end points).

          Conclusions and Relevance

          The findings of this cohort study of middle-aged UK adults suggest that a diet characterized by high-quality plant-based foods and lower intakes of animal products may be beneficial for health, irrespective of established chronic disease risk factors and genetic predisposition.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          UK Biobank: An Open Access Resource for Identifying the Causes of a Wide Range of Complex Diseases of Middle and Old Age

          Cathie Sudlow and colleagues describe the UK Biobank, a large population-based prospective study, established to allow investigation of the genetic and non-genetic determinants of the diseases of middle and old age.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The gut microbiota, bacterial metabolites and colorectal cancer.

              Accumulating evidence suggests that the human intestinal microbiota contributes to the aetiology of colorectal cancer (CRC), not only via the pro-carcinogenic activities of specific pathogens but also via the influence of the wider microbial community, particularly its metabolome. Recent data have shown that the short-chain fatty acids acetate, propionate and butyrate function in the suppression of inflammation and cancer, whereas other microbial metabolites, such as secondary bile acids, promote carcinogenesis. In this Review, we discuss the relationship between diet, microbial metabolism and CRC and argue that the cumulative effects of microbial metabolites should be considered in order to better predict and prevent cancer progression.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Network Open
                American Medical Association
                2574-3805
                28 March 2023
                March 2023
                28 March 2023
                : 6
                : 3
                : e234714
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen’s University, Belfast, United Kingdom
                [2 ]Department of Nutrition, Food Science, and Gastronomy, School of Pharmacy and Food Sciences, Institute for Research on Nutrition and Food Safety, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
                [3 ]Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y la Nutrición, Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
                [4 ]Division of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
                [5 ]Centre for Public Health, Queen’s University, Belfast, United Kingdom
                [6 ]Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
                [7 ]Danish Cancer Society Research Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark
                [8 ]Nutrition and Health Innovation Research Institute, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia
                [9 ]Nutrition and Metabolism Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
                [10 ]Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: February 8, 2023.
                Published: March 28, 2023. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.4714
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2023 Thompson AS et al. JAMA Network Open.
                Corresponding Authors: Tilman Kühn, PhD ( t.kuhn@ 123456qub.ac.uk ), and Aedín Cassidy, PhD ( a.cassidy@ 123456qub.ac.uk ), Institute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast, 19 Chlorine Gardens, Belfast BT9 5DL, UK.
                Author Contributions: Ms Thompson and Dr Kühn had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Thompson, Jennings, Cantwell, Cassidy, Kühn.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Thompson, Cassidy, Kühn.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
                Statistical analysis: Thompson, Tresserra-Rimbau, Karavasiloglou, Cantwell, Cassidy, Kühn.
                Obtained funding: Thompson, Cassidy.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Cassidy, Kühn.
                Supervision: Tresserra-Rimbau, Jennings, Bondonno, Cassidy, Kühn.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Karavasiloglou reported grants from World Cancer Research Fund International outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.
                Funding/Support: Ms Thompson holds a PhD studentship in the Department for the Economy, Northern Ireland. This research was conducted using UK Biobank funded and sourced data (application 64426). The UK Biobank was established by the Wellcome Trust, the Medical Research Council, the UK Department of Health, and the Scottish Government. The UK Biobank has also received funding from the Welsh Assembly Government, the British Heart Foundation, Diabetes United Kingdom, the Northwest Regional Development Agency, and the Scottish Government.
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Disclaimer: Where authors are identified as personnel of the International Agency for Research on Cancer/World Health Organization (IARC/WHO), the authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this article and they do not necessarily represent the decisions, policy, or views of the IARC/WHO.
                Data Sharing Statement: See Supplement 2.
                Article
                zoi230174
                10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.4714
                10051114
                36976560
                b9984950-9136-4d93-b58f-be6efff6858b
                Copyright 2023 Thompson AS et al. JAMA Network Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 18 October 2022
                : 8 February 2023
                Categories
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online Only
                Nutrition, Obesity, and Exercise

                Comments

                Comment on this article