Dear Editor,
Immunogenic cell death (ICD) facilitates danger signalling-driven trafficking of damage-associated
molecular patterns (DAMPs) like extracellular ATP (eATP).
1, 2
The binding of eATP to P2X7 receptor triggers immunogenic signalling,
3
which (along with other factors) converts the dying cancer cells into an effective
anticancer vaccine.
3
Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress is central to ICD,
1
on the basis of which ICD inducers are subdivided into two types,
1
that is, Type I (e.g., some chemotherapies), which elicit danger signalling through
'collateral' non-lethal ER stress,
1
and Type II (e.g., hypericin-photodynamic therapy (Hyp-PDT)), which elicit danger
signalling via 'focused' lethal ER stress.
1, 4
Type II and Type I ICD inducers differ on several levels, for example, plasticity
of danger signalling and the trafficking mechanisms of DAMPs.
4
In fact, eATP was found to be absent during Newcastle disease virus (NDV)-induced
Type II ICD despite the induction of macroautophagy (a Type I ICD-associated, eATP-trafficking
mechanism).
2, 5
Moreover, we have established that Hyp-PDT-induced eATP is PERK and secretory pathway-dependent,
6
while being independent of macroautophagy
7
or chaperone-mediated autophagy.
8
This raised an important question – like in the case of NDV-induced ICD, could eATP
be dispensable or a partial immunogenic signal for Hyp-PDT-induced ICD?
To this end, we decided to gain further insights into the eATP-trafficking mechanism
and its immunogenic potential following Hyp-PDT. To address the contribution of the
pannexin/connexin-caspase axes
2
that elicits eATP secretion (in response to Type I ICD inducers but remains enigmatic
in the Type II settings), we utilized the pan-pannexin/connexin inhibitor, carbenoxolone
(CBX). In CT26 cells treated with Hyp-PDT, CBX pretreatment failed to reduce eATP
(Figure 1a), thereby suggesting the dispensability of pannexins/connexins. Next, we
addressed the role of caspase activity using the pan-inhibitor, zVAD-fmk. Interestingly,
zVAD-fmk significantly reduced Hyp-PDT-induced eATP (Figure 1a). Considering the previously
demonstrated role of casp-8 in ICD
1, 6
we wondered whether this caspase was mediating eATP secretion. Interestingly, CT26
cells expressing caspase-8 shRNA (casp-8 shRNA) also exhibited significantly reduced
eATP following Hyp-PDT (Figure 1a).
The regulation of eATP secretion by casp-8 was unexpected, as our previous study found
casp-8 to be dispensable for Hyp-PDT-induced ICD, in vivo.
6
This suggested that eATP secretion may not be crucial for Hyp-PDT-induced ICD, in
vivo. To resolve this, we utilized the CT26-BALB/c mice prophylactic vaccination model.
Immunogenic effects of eATP were blocked using either Apyrase or Apy (an ATP-degrading
enzyme, Figure 1b) or a 2,3-dialdehyde derivative of ATP, that is, oxidized-ATP (Oxi-ATP,
a P2X7 receptor antagonist) or a combination of both (i.e., Apy+Oxi-ATP).
3
Approximately 70% of the mice immunized with Hyp-PDT-based vaccine efficiently rejected
the formation of CT26 tumours at the challenge site (Figure 1c). Interestingly, eATP
degradation or blockade of P2X7 receptor, alone, failed to strongly reduce the tumour-rejecting
immunity (Figure 1c). On the other hand, only the combination of Apy+Oxi-ATP significantly
reduced the vaccine's tumour-rejecting capacity (Figure 1c). Thus, eATP, despite being
ubiquitously secreted after Hyp-PDT,
6, 7, 8
only acts as a partial immunogenic signal, and thus singular blockade of either eATP
or its P2X7 receptor is unable to reduce the immunogenic potential of the vaccine.
These results are unprecedented because eATP and P2X7 receptor had been shown to act
in a synergistic manner.
1, 2, 3
Here, we rather observed a potentiating effect, that is, blockade of either eATP or
P2X7 receptor did not, but combined blockade significantly reduced ICD's immunogenic
potential. Thus, our results suggest that the mere presence of eATP does not ensure
the presence of corresponding immunogenic activity in all contexts. Moreover, a certain
degree of redundancy exists on the level of purinergic receptor agonists, and thus
these results may also point to the release of such (as-yet-uncharacterized) agonists
from dying cells. Lastly, these observations are based on the heterotopic (subcutaneous)
tumour model; it would be crucial to reanalyze the role of eATP in an orthotopic tumour
model to overcome immunological variations stemming from incompatibility between the
transplanted cancer type and the surrounding tissue.