1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Preservice teachers implementing a nonlinear physical education pedagogy

      1 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5
      Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy
      Informa UK Limited

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Research Methods in Education

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Movement Systems as Dynamical Systems

            In recent years, concepts and tools from dynamical systems theory have been successfully applied to the study of movement systems, contradicting traditional views of variability as noise or error. From this perspective, it is apparent that variability in movement systems is omnipresent and unavoidable due to the distinct constraints that shape each individual's behaviour. In this position paper, it is argued that trial-to-trial movement variations within individuals and performance differences observed between individuals may be best interpreted as attempts to exploit the variability that is inherent within and between biological systems. That is, variability in movement systems helps individuals adapt to the unique constraints (personal, task and environmental) impinging on them across different timescales. We examine the implications of these ideas for sports medicine, by: (i) focusing on intra-individual variability in postural control to exemplify within-individual real-time adaptations to changing informational constraints in the performance environment; and (ii) interpreting recent evidence on the role of the angiotensin-converting enzyme gene as a genetic (developmental) constraint on individual differences in physical performance. The implementation of a dynamical systems theoretical interpretation of variability in movement systems signals a need to re-evaluate the ubiquitous influence of the traditional 'medical model' in interpreting motor behaviour and performance constrained by disease or injury to the movement system. Accordingly, there is a need to develop new tools for providing individualised plots of motor behaviour and performance as a function of key constraints. Coordination profiling is proposed as one such alternative approach for interpreting the variability and stability demonstrated by individuals as they attempt to construct functional, goal-directed patterns of motor behaviour during each unique performance. Finally, the relative contribution of genes and training to between-individual performance variation is highlighted, with the conclusion that dynamical systems theory provides an appropriate multidisciplinary theoretical framework to explain their interaction in supporting physical performance.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A constraints-led perspective to understanding skill acquisition and game play: a basis for integration of motor learning theory and physical education praxis?

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy
                Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy
                Informa UK Limited
                1740-8989
                1742-5786
                August 12 2019
                November 02 2019
                June 12 2019
                November 02 2019
                : 24
                : 6
                : 565-581
                Affiliations
                [1 ] School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
                [2 ] Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Human Health and Wellbeing Domain, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
                [3 ] Centre for Sports Engineering Research, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
                [4 ] FiDiPro Programme, Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Finland
                [5 ] Australian College of Applied Psychology, Brisbane, Australia
                Article
                10.1080/17408989.2019.1628934
                de63a17b-acc2-41d6-93fe-d5f8aa7d65c3
                © 2019
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article