13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Differences between fast and slow muscles in scallops revealed through proteomics and transcriptomics

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Scallops possess striated and catch adductor muscles, which have different structure and contractile properties. The striated muscle contracts very quickly for swimming, whereas the smooth catch muscle can keep the shells closed for long periods with little expenditure of energy. In this study, we performed proteomic and transcriptomic analyses of differences between the striated (fast) and catch (slow) adductor muscles in Yesso scallop Patinopecten yessoensis.

          Results

          Transcriptomic analysis reveals 1316 upregulated and 8239 downregulated genes in slow compared to fast adductor muscle. For the same comparison, iTRAQ-based proteomics reveals 474 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs), 198 up- and 276 downregulated. These DEPs mainly comprise muscle-specific proteins of the sarcoplasmic reticulum, extracellular matrix, and metabolic pathways. A group of conventional muscle proteins—myosin heavy chain, myosin regulatory light chain, myosin essential light chain, and troponin—are enriched in fast muscle. In contrast, paramyosin, twitchin, and catchin are preferentially expressed in slow muscle. The association analysis of proteomic and transcriptomic data provides the evidences of regulatory events at the transcriptional and posttranscriptional levels in fast and slow muscles. Among 1236 differentially expressed unigenes, 22.7% show a similar regulation of mRNA levels and protein abundances. In contrast, more unigenes (53.2%) exhibit striking differences between gene expression and protein abundances in the two muscles, which indicates the existence of fiber-type specific, posttranscriptional regulatory events in most of myofibrillar proteins, such as myosin heavy chain, titin, troponin, and twitchin.

          Conclusions

          This first, global view of protein and mRNA expression levels in scallop fast and slow muscles reveal that regulatory mechanisms at the transcriptional and posttranscriptional levels are essential in the maintenance of muscle structure and function. The existence of fiber-type specific, posttranscriptional regulatory mechanisms in myofibrillar proteins will greatly improve our understanding of the molecular basis of muscle contraction and its regulation in non-model invertebrates.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1186/s12864-018-4770-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references70

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology

          Genomic sequencing has made it clear that a large fraction of the genes specifying the core biological functions are shared by all eukaryotes. Knowledge of the biological role of such shared proteins in one organism can often be transferred to other organisms. The goal of the Gene Ontology Consortium is to produce a dynamic, controlled vocabulary that can be applied to all eukaryotes even as knowledge of gene and protein roles in cells is accumulating and changing. To this end, three independent ontologies accessible on the World-Wide Web (http://www.geneontology.org) are being constructed: biological process, molecular function and cellular component.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Locating rearrangement events in a phylogeny based on highly fragmented assemblies

            Background The inference of genome rearrangement operations requires complete genome assemblies as input data, since a rearrangement can involve an arbitrarily large proportion of one or more chromosomes. Most genome sequence projects, especially those on non-model organisms for which no physical map exists, produce very fragmented assembles, so that a rearranged fragment may be impossible to identify because its two endpoints are on different scaffolds. However, breakpoints are easily identified, as long as they do not coincide with scaffold ends. For the phylogenetic context, in comparing a fragmented assembly with a number of complete assemblies, certain combinatorial constraints on breakpoints can be derived. We ask to what extent we can use breakpoint data between a fragmented genome and a number of complete genomes to recover all the arrangements in a phylogeny. Results We simulate genomic evolution via chromosomal inversion, fragmenting one of the genomes into a large number of scaffolds to represent the incompleteness of assembly. We identify all the breakpoints between this genome and the remainder. We devise an algorithm which takes these breakpoints into account in trying to determine on which branch of the phylogeny a rearrangement event occurred. We present an analysis of the dependence of recovery rates on scaffold size and rearrangement rate, and show that the true tree, the one on which the rearrangement simulation was performed, tends to be most parsimonious in estimating the number of true events inferred. Conclusions It is somewhat surprising that the breakpoints identified just between the fragmented genome and each of the others suffice to recover most of the rearrangements produced by the simulations. This holds even in parts of the phylogeny disjoint from the lineage of the fragmented genome.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Alpha-actinin structure and regulation.

              Alpha-actinin is a cytoskeletal actin-binding protein and a member of the spectrin superfamily, which comprises spectrin, dystrophin and their homologues and isoforms. It forms an anti-parallel rod-shaped dimer with one actin-binding domain at each end of the rod and bundles actin filaments in multiple cell-type and cytoskeleton frameworks. In non-muscle cells, alpha-actinin is found along the actin filaments and in adhesion sites. In striated, cardiac and smooth muscle cells, it is localized at the Z-disk and analogous dense bodies, where it forms a lattice-like structure and stabilizes the muscle contractile apparatus. Besides binding to actin filaments alpha-actinin associates with a number of cytoskeletal and signaling molecules, cytoplasmic domains of transmembrane receptors and ion channels, rendering it important structural and regulatory roles in cytoskeleton organization and muscle contraction. This review reports on the current knowledge on structure and regulation of alpha-actinin.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                xjsun@ysfri.ac.cn
                liuzh@ysfri.ac.cn
                wubiao@ysfri.ac.cn
                zhoulq@ysfri.ac.cn
                ocean_qq@163.com
                wuwei@ysfri.ac.cn
                +8653285811982 , yangag@ysfri.ac.cn
                Journal
                BMC Genomics
                BMC Genomics
                BMC Genomics
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2164
                22 May 2018
                22 May 2018
                2018
                : 19
                : 377
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9413 3760, GRID grid.43308.3c, Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute, , Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, ; Qingdao, 266071 China
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 5998 3072, GRID grid.484590.4, Function Laboratory for Marine Fisheries Science and Food Production Processes, , Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, ; Qingdao, 266200 People’s Republic of China
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2152 3263, GRID grid.4422.0, College of Fisheries, , Ocean University of China, ; Qingdao, 266003 China
                Article
                4770
                10.1186/s12864-018-4770-2
                5963113
                29783952
                e21ce80b-56a0-4760-8d0a-4b734f6d4046
                © The Author(s). 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 3 May 2017
                : 9 May 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: National Natural Science Foundation of China (CN)
                Award ID: 31602153
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province
                Award ID: ZR2016CQ32
                Funded by: the Key Laboratory of Mariculture, Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China
                Award ID: KLM2018004
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Laboratory for Marine Fisheries Science and Food Production Processes, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, China P. R. China
                Award ID: 2016LMFS-B02
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Genetics
                scallops,striated adductor muscle,catch adductor muscle,proteomics,transcriptomics
                Genetics
                scallops, striated adductor muscle, catch adductor muscle, proteomics, transcriptomics

                Comments

                Comment on this article