29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Evaluation of methods and marker Systems in Genomic Selection of oil palm ( Elaeis guineensis Jacq.)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Genomic selection (GS) uses genome-wide markers as an attempt to accelerate genetic gain in breeding programs of both animals and plants. This approach is particularly useful for perennial crops such as oil palm, which have long breeding cycles, and for which the optimal method for GS is still under debate. In this study, we evaluated the effect of different marker systems and modeling methods for implementing GS in an introgressed dura family derived from a Deli dura x Nigerian dura (Deli x Nigerian) with 112 individuals. This family is an important breeding source for developing new mother palms for superior oil yield and bunch characters. The traits of interest selected for this study were fruit-to-bunch (F/B), shell-to-fruit (S/F), kernel-to-fruit (K/F), mesocarp-to-fruit (M/F), oil per palm (O/P) and oil-to-dry mesocarp (O/DM). The marker systems evaluated were simple sequence repeats (SSRs) and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). RR-BLUP, Bayesian A, B, Cπ, LASSO, Ridge Regression and two machine learning methods (SVM and Random Forest) were used to evaluate GS accuracy of the traits.

          Results

          The kinship coefficient between individuals in this family ranged from 0.35 to 0.62. S/F and O/DM had the highest genomic heritability, whereas F/B and O/P had the lowest. The accuracies using 135 SSRs were low, with accuracies of the traits around 0.20. The average accuracy of machine learning methods was 0.24, as compared to 0.20 achieved by other methods. The trait with the highest mean accuracy was F/B (0.28), while the lowest were both M/F and O/P (0.18). By using whole genomic SNPs, the accuracies for all traits, especially for O/DM (0.43), S/F (0.39) and M/F (0.30) were improved. The average accuracy of machine learning methods was 0.32, compared to 0.31 achieved by other methods.

          Conclusion

          Due to high genomic resolution, the use of whole-genome SNPs improved the efficiency of GS dramatically for oil palm and is recommended for dura breeding programs. Machine learning slightly outperformed other methods, but required parameters optimization for GS implementation.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1186/s12863-017-0576-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Genomic selection.

          Genomic selection is a form of marker-assisted selection in which genetic markers covering the whole genome are used so that all quantitative trait loci (QTL) are in linkage disequilibrium with at least one marker. This approach has become feasible thanks to the large number of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) discovered by genome sequencing and new methods to efficiently genotype large number of SNP. Simulation results and limited experimental results suggest that breeding values can be predicted with high accuracy using genetic markers alone but more validation is required especially in samples of the population different from that in which the effect of the markers was estimated. The ideal method to estimate the breeding value from genomic data is to calculate the conditional mean of the breeding value given the genotype of the animal at each QTL. This conditional mean can only be calculated by using a prior distribution of QTL effects so this should be part of the research carried out to implement genomic selection. In practice, this method of estimating breeding values is approximated by using the marker genotypes instead of the QTL genotypes but the ideal method is likely to be approached more closely as more sequence and SNP data is obtained. Implementation of genomic selection is likely to have major implications for genetic evaluation systems and for genetic improvement programmes generally and these are discussed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Oil palm genome sequence reveals divergence of interfertile species in old and new worlds

            Oil palm is the most productive oil-bearing crop. Planted on only 5% of the total vegetable oil acreage, palm oil accounts for 33% of vegetable oil, and 45% of edible oil worldwide, but increased cultivation competes with dwindling rainforest reserves. We report the 1.8 gigabase (Gb) genome sequence of the African oil palm Elaeis guineensis, the predominant source of worldwide oil production. 1.535 Gb of assembled sequence and transcriptome data from 30 tissue types were used to predict at least 34,802 genes, including oil biosynthesis genes and homologues of WRINKLED1 (WRI1), and other transcriptional regulators 1 , which are highly expressed in the kernel. We also report the draft sequence of the S. American oil palm Elaeis oleifera, which has the same number of chromosomes (2n=32) and produces fertile interspecific hybrids with E. guineensis 2 , but appears to have diverged in the new world. Segmental duplications of chromosome arms define the palaeotetraploid origin of palm trees. The oil palm sequence enables the discovery of genes for important traits as well as somaclonal epigenetic alterations which restrict the use of clones in commercial plantings 3 , and thus helps achieve sustainability for biofuels and edible oils, reducing the rainforest footprint of this tropical plantation crop.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              related: an R package for analysing pairwise relatedness from codominant molecular markers.

              Analyses of pairwise relatedness represent a key component to addressing many topics in biology. However, such analyses have been limited because most available programs provide a means to estimate relatedness based on only a single estimator, making comparison across estimators difficult. Second, all programs to date have been platform specific, working only on a specific operating system. This has the undesirable outcome of making choice of relatedness estimator limited by operating system preference, rather than being based on scientific rationale. Here, we present a new R package, called related, that can calculate relatedness based on seven estimators, can account for genotyping errors, missing data and inbreeding, and can estimate 95% confidence intervals. Moreover, simulation functions are provided that allow for easy comparison of the performance of different estimators and for analyses of how much resolution to expect from a given data set. Because this package works in R, it is platform independent. Combined, this functionality should allow for more appropriate analyses and interpretation of pairwise relatedness and will also allow for the integration of relatedness data into larger R workflows.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                kwong.qi.bin@simedarbyplantation.com
                teh.chee.keng@simedarbyplantation.com
                ong.ailing.sdtc@simedarbyplantation.com
                dbscft@nus.edu.sg
                Sean.Mayes@nottingham.ac.uk
                harikrishna.k@simedarbyplantation.com
                martti.tammi@simedarbyplantation.com
                suathui_yeoh@um.edu.my
                david.ross.appleton@simedarbyplantation.com
                jennihari@um.edu.my
                Journal
                BMC Genet
                BMC Genet
                BMC Genetics
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2156
                11 December 2017
                11 December 2017
                2017
                : 18
                : 107
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Biotechnology & Breeding Department, Sime Darby Plantation R&D Centre, 43400 Serdang, Selangor Malaysia
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2308 5949, GRID grid.10347.31, Institute of Biological Sciences, University Malaya, ; 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2180 6431, GRID grid.4280.e, Department of Biological Sciences, , National University of Singapore, ; Singapore, 117543 Singapore
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8868, GRID grid.4563.4, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, ; Nr, Loughborough, LE12 5RD UK
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2308 5949, GRID grid.10347.31, Centre of Research in Biotechnology for Agriculture (CEBAR), , University of Malaya, ; 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9840-6807
                Article
                576
                10.1186/s12863-017-0576-5
                5725918
                29228905
                f858e292-a979-46b4-b922-119bb00ea01e
                © The Author(s). 2017

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 23 August 2017
                : 29 November 2017
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Genetics
                genomic prediction,complex traits,machine learning,predictive modeling,marker-assisted selection,ssr,snp,perennial crop

                Comments

                Comment on this article