21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Gene isoforms as expression-based biomarkers predictive of drug response in vitro

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Next-generation sequencing technologies have recently been used in pharmacogenomic studies to characterize large panels of cancer cell lines at the genomic and transcriptomic levels. Among these technologies, RNA-sequencing enable profiling of alternatively spliced transcripts. Given the high frequency of mRNA splicing in cancers, linking this feature to drug response will open new avenues of research in biomarker discovery. To identify robust transcriptomic biomarkers for drug response across studies, we develop a meta-analytical framework combining the pharmacological data from two large-scale drug screening datasets. We use an independent pan-cancer pharmacogenomic dataset to test the robustness of our candidate biomarkers across multiple cancer types. We further analyze two independent breast cancer datasets and find that specific isoforms of IGF2BP2, NECTIN4, ITGB6, and KLHDC9 are significantly associated with AZD6244, lapatinib, erlotinib, and paclitaxel, respectively. Our results support isoform expressions as a rich resource for biomarkers predictive of drug response.

          Abstract

          Altered mRNA splicing features in many cancers, but it has not been linked to drug response. Here, with their meta-analytic framework, the authors analyse pharmacogenomic data to identify isoform-based biomarkers predictive of in vitro drug response, and show them to frequently be strong predictors.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The NCI60 human tumour cell line anticancer drug screen.

            The US National Cancer Institute (NCI) 60 human tumour cell line anticancer drug screen (NCI60) was developed in the late 1980s as an in vitro drug-discovery tool intended to supplant the use of transplantable animal tumours in anticancer drug screening. This screening model was rapidly recognized as a rich source of information about the mechanisms of growth inhibition and tumour-cell kill. Recently, its role has changed to that of a service screen supporting the cancer research community. Here I review the development, use and productivity of the screen, highlighting several outcomes that have contributed to advances in cancer chemotherapy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A community effort to assess and improve drug sensitivity prediction algorithms.

              Predicting the best treatment strategy from genomic information is a core goal of precision medicine. Here we focus on predicting drug response based on a cohort of genomic, epigenomic and proteomic profiling data sets measured in human breast cancer cell lines. Through a collaborative effort between the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and the Dialogue on Reverse Engineering Assessment and Methods (DREAM) project, we analyzed a total of 44 drug sensitivity prediction algorithms. The top-performing approaches modeled nonlinear relationships and incorporated biological pathway information. We found that gene expression microarrays consistently provided the best predictive power of the individual profiling data sets; however, performance was increased by including multiple, independent data sets. We discuss the innovations underlying the top-performing methodology, Bayesian multitask MKL, and we provide detailed descriptions of all methods. This study establishes benchmarks for drug sensitivity prediction and identifies approaches that can be leveraged for the development of new methods.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                bhaibeka@uhnresearch.ca
                Journal
                Nat Commun
                Nat Commun
                Nature Communications
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2041-1723
                24 October 2017
                24 October 2017
                2017
                : 8
                : 1126
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0474 0428, GRID grid.231844.8, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, , University Health Network, ; 101 College Street, Toronto, ON Canada M5G1L7
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2157 2938, GRID grid.17063.33, Department of Medical Biophysics, , University of Toronto, ; 101 College Street, Toronto, ON Canada M5G1L7
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2292 3357, GRID grid.14848.31, Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal, ; 110 Pine Avenue West, Montreal, QC Canada H2W 1R7
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0474 0428, GRID grid.231844.8, Campbell Family Institute for Breast Cancer Research, ; 620 University Avenue, Toronto, ON Canada M5G2C1
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2157 2938, GRID grid.17063.33, Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, , University of Toronto, ; 27 King’s College Circle, Toronto, ON Canada M5S 1A1
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2157 2938, GRID grid.17063.33, Department of Computer Science, , University of Toronto, ; 10 King’s College Road, Toronto, ON Canada M5S 3G4
                [7 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0626 690X, GRID grid.419890.d, Ontario Institute of Cancer Research, ; 661 University Avenue, Suite 510, Toronto, ON Canada M5G 0A3
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9395-8450
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7684-0079
                Article
                1153
                10.1038/s41467-017-01153-8
                5655668
                29066719
                2ffe6ab9-8491-4af0-8b49-71936f89c8ab
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 30 August 2016
                : 23 August 2017
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article