3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      m 6A RNA Methylation Regulators Contribute to Eutopic Endometrium and Myometrium Dysfunction in Adenomyosis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Adenomyosis is a prevalent, estrogen-dependent uterine disorder wherein endometrial cells are abnormally present in the myometrium and are surrounded by hyperplastic/hypertrophic smooth muscle. Its etiology is unclear, although endometrial cell invasion into the myometrium has been postulated. RNA methylation, particularly N6-methyladenosine (m 6A), plays an important role in regulating various physiological processes and invasive disorders. The goal of this in silico and lab-based experimental study was to explore a possible role for m 6A in adenomyosis. Gene expression profiles of both the endometrium and myometrium of women with adenomyosis (cases) and without disease (controls) were obtained from the publicly available Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. In the endometrium, STRING database analysis revealed that METTL3 functions as a “hub” gene of m 6A RNA methylation regulators, and the genes involved in m 6A regulation, including METTL3, FTO, ZC3H13, and YTHDC1 expression, were significantly decreased in cases versus controls. Functional, co-expression, and correlational analyses of endometrium from cases versus controls revealed decreased total m 6A levels, induced by METTL3, and the downstream elevated insulin−like growth factor−1(IGF1) and D-Dopachrome Tautomerase ( DDT), with the latter two having known functions in epithelial proliferation and cell migration, which are important processes in the pathogenesis of adenomyosis in endometrium. m 6A RNA methylation regulators, including RBM15/15B, ALKBH5, FTO, YTHDF1/2, KIAA1429, HNRNPC, METTL3, ZC3H13, and YTHDC2, were also differentially expressed in the myometrium from cases versus controls. We validated decreased total m 6A levels and differential expression of m 6A RNA methylation regulators in the myometrium of patients with adenomyosis using qRT-PCR, immunohistochemistry and tissues available from our biorepository. Possible target genes, including cadherin 3(CDH3), sodium channelβ -subunit 4 ( SCN4B), and placenta-specific protein 8 (PLAC8), which are involved in cell adhesion, muscle contraction and immune response in the myometrium of adenomyosis patients were also validated. Thus, through extensive public database mining and validation of select genes, this study, for the first time, implicates m 6A and its methylation regulators in the pathogenesis of adenomyosis. Follow on functional studies are anticipated to elucidate mechanisms involving m 6A and its regulators and down-stream effectors in the pathogenesis of this enigmatic reproductive disorder and potentially identify druggable targets to control its associated symptoms.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          VIRMA mediates preferential m 6 A mRNA methylation in 3′UTR and near stop codon and associates with alternative polyadenylation

          N 6-methyladenosine (m6A) is enriched in 3′untranslated region (3′UTR) and near stop codon of mature polyadenylated mRNAs in mammalian systems and has regulatory roles in eukaryotic mRNA transcriptome switch. Significantly, the mechanism for this modification preference remains unknown, however. Herein we report a characterization of the full m6A methyltransferase complex in HeLa cells identifying METTL3/METTL14/WTAP/VIRMA/HAKAI/ZC3H13 as the key components, and we show that VIRMA mediates preferential mRNA methylation in 3′UTR and near stop codon. Biochemical studies reveal that VIRMA recruits the catalytic core components METTL3/METTL14/WTAP to guide region-selective methylations. Around 60% of VIRMA mRNA immunoprecipitation targets manifest strong m6A enrichment in 3′UTR. Depletions of VIRMA and METTL3 induce 3′UTR lengthening of several hundred mRNAs with over 50% targets in common. VIRMA associates with polyadenylation cleavage factors CPSF5 and CPSF6 in an RNA-dependent manner. Depletion of CPSF5 leads to significant shortening of 3′UTR of over 2800 mRNAs, 84% of which are modified with m6A and have increased m6A peak density in 3′UTR and near stop codon after CPSF5 knockdown. Together, our studies provide insights into m6A deposition specificity in 3′UTR and its correlation with alternative polyadenylation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Mettl3-mediated mRNA m 6 A methylation promotes dendritic cell activation

            N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification plays important roles in various cellular responses by regulating mRNA biology. However, how m6A modification is involved in innate immunity via affecting the translation of immune transcripts remains to be further investigated. Here we report that RNA methyltransferase Mettl3-mediated mRNA m6A methylation promotes dendritic cell (DC) activation and function. Specific depletion of Mettl3 in DC resulted in impaired phenotypic and functional maturation of DC, with decreased expression of co-stimulatory molecules CD40, CD80 and cytokine IL-12, and reduced ability to stimulate T cell responses both in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, Mettl3-mediated m6A of CD40, CD80 and TLR4 signaling adaptor Tirap transcripts enhanced their translation in DC for stimulating T cell activation, and strengthening TLR4/NF-κB signaling-induced cytokine production. Our findings identify a new role for Mettl3-mediated m6A modification in increasing translation of certain immune transcripts for physiological promotion of DC activation and DC-based T cell response.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Endometrial stem/progenitor cells: the first 10 years

              BACKGROUND The existence of stem/progenitor cells in the endometrium was postulated many years ago, but the first functional evidence was only published in 2004. The identification of rare epithelial and stromal populations of clonogenic cells in human endometrium has opened an active area of research on endometrial stem/progenitor cells in the subsequent 10 years. METHODS The published literature was searched using the PubMed database with the search terms ‘endometrial stem cells and menstrual blood stem cells' until December 2014. RESULTS Endometrial epithelial stem/progenitor cells have been identified as clonogenic cells in human and as label-retaining or CD44+ cells in mouse endometrium, but their characterization has been modest. In contrast, endometrial mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) have been well characterized and show similar properties to bone marrow MSCs. Specific markers for their enrichment have been identified, CD146+PDGFRβ+ (platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta) and SUSD2+ (sushi domain containing-2), which detected their perivascular location and likely pericyte identity in endometrial basalis and functionalis vessels. Transcriptomics and secretomics of SUSD2+ cells confirm their perivascular phenotype. Stromal fibroblasts cultured from endometrial tissue or menstrual blood also have some MSC characteristics and demonstrate broad multilineage differentiation potential for mesodermal, endodermal and ectodermal lineages, indicating their plasticity. Side population (SP) cells are a mixed population, although predominantly vascular cells, which exhibit adult stem cell properties, including tissue reconstitution. There is some evidence that bone marrow cells contribute a small population of endometrial epithelial and stromal cells. The discovery of specific markers for endometrial stem/progenitor cells has enabled the examination of their role in endometrial proliferative disorders, including endometriosis, adenomyosis and Asherman's syndrome. Endometrial MSCs (eMSCs) and menstrual blood stromal fibroblasts are an attractive source of MSCs for regenerative medicine because of their relative ease of acquisition with minimal morbidity. Their homologous and non-homologous use as autologous and allogeneic cells for therapeutic purposes is currently being assessed in preclinical animal models of pelvic organ prolapse and phase I/II clinical trials for cardiac failure. eMSCs and stromal fibroblasts also exhibit non-stem cell-associated immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory properties, further emphasizing their desirable properties for cell-based therapies. CONCLUSIONS Much has been learnt about endometrial stem/progenitor cells in the 10 years since their discovery, although several unresolved issues remain. These include rationalizing the terminology and diagnostic characteristics used for distinguishing perivascular stem/progenitor cells from stromal fibroblasts, which also have considerable differentiation potential. The hierarchical relationship between clonogenic epithelial progenitor cells, endometrial and decidual SP cells, CD146+PDGFR-β+ and SUSD2+ cells and menstrual blood stromal fibroblasts still needs to be resolved. Developing more genetic animal models for investigating the role of endometrial stem/progenitor cells in endometrial disorders is required, as well as elucidating which bone marrow cells contribute to endometrial tissue. Deep sequencing and epigenetic profiling of enriched populations of endometrial stem/progenitor cells and their differentiated progeny at the population and single-cell level will shed new light on the regulation and function of endometrial stem/progenitor cells.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Genet
                Front Genet
                Front. Genet.
                Frontiers in Genetics
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-8021
                03 July 2020
                2020
                : 11
                : 716
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Center for Reproductive Sciences, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco , San Francisco, CA, United States
                [2] 2Center for Reproductive Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University , Shanghai, China
                [3] 3Shanghai Key Laboratory for Assisted Reproduction and Reproductive Genetics , Shanghai, China
                Author notes

                Edited by: Graziano Pesole, National Research Council, Italy

                Reviewed by: Ernesto Picardi, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Italy; Balint Nagy, University of Debrecen, Hungary

                *Correspondence: Linda C. Giudice, linda.giudice@ 123456ucsf.edu

                This article was submitted to RNA, a section of the journal Frontiers in Genetics

                Article
                10.3389/fgene.2020.00716
                7350935
                32719721
                3982c53f-9bed-4a84-8c87-77d2f89ed344
                Copyright © 2020 Zhai, Li, Sen, Opoku-Anane, Du, Chen and Giudice.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 25 March 2020
                : 12 June 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 7, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 60, Pages: 16, Words: 0
                Categories
                Genetics
                Original Research

                Genetics
                adenomyosis,m6a,mettl3,endometrium,myometrium,in silico
                Genetics
                adenomyosis, m6a, mettl3, endometrium, myometrium, in silico

                Comments

                Comment on this article