4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      ESCRT-III–mediated membrane fusion drives chromosome fragments through nuclear envelope channels

      research-article
      , , ,
      The Journal of Cell Biology
      Rockefeller University Press

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Cells dividing with late-segregating acentric chromosomes must reincorporate acentrics into telophase daughter nuclei to maintain euploidy. Here, Warecki et al. show that fusion between membrane on acentrics and membrane on daughter nuclei allows acentric passage through channels formed in all components of the nascent nuclear envelope, thus preserving genomic integrity.

          Abstract

          Mitotic cells must form a single nucleus during telophase or exclude part of their genome as damage-prone micronuclei. While research has detailed how micronuclei arise from cells entering anaphase with lagging chromosomes, cellular mechanisms allowing late-segregating chromosomes to rejoin daughter nuclei remain underexplored. Here, we find that late-segregating acentric chromosome fragments that rejoin daughter nuclei are associated with nuclear membrane but devoid of lamin and nuclear pore complexes in Drosophila melanogaster. We show that acentrics pass through membrane-, lamin-, and nuclear pore–based channels in the nuclear envelope that extend and retract as acentrics enter nuclei. Membrane encompassing the acentrics fuses with the nuclear membrane, facilitating integration of the acentrics into newly formed nuclei. Fusion, mediated by the membrane fusion protein Comt/NSF and ESCRT-III components Shrub/CHMP4B and CHMP2B, facilitates reintegration of acentrics into nuclei. These results suggest a previously unsuspected role for membrane fusion, similar to nuclear repair, in the formation of a single nucleus during mitotic exit and the maintenance of genomic integrity.

          Related collections

          Most cited references53

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A class of membrane proteins shaping the tubular endoplasmic reticulum.

          How is the characteristic shape of a membrane bound organelle achieved? We have used an in vitro system to address the mechanism by which the tubular network of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is generated and maintained. Based on the inhibitory effect of sulfhydryl reagents and antibodies, network formation in vitro requires the integral membrane protein Rtn4a/NogoA, a member of the ubiquitous reticulon family. Both in yeast and mammalian cells, the reticulons are largely restricted to the tubular ER and are excluded from the continuous sheets of the nuclear envelope and peripheral ER. Upon overexpression, the reticulons form tubular membrane structures. The reticulons interact with DP1/Yop1p, a conserved integral membrane protein that also localizes to the tubular ER. These proteins share an unusual hairpin topology in the membrane. The simultaneous absence of the reticulons and Yop1p in S. cerevisiae results in disrupted tubular ER. We propose that these "morphogenic" proteins partition into and stabilize highly curved ER membrane tubules.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Molecular mechanisms of micronucleus, nucleoplasmic bridge and nuclear bud formation in mammalian and human cells.

            Micronuclei (MN) and other nuclear anomalies such as nucleoplasmic bridges (NPBs) and nuclear buds (NBUDs) are biomarkers of genotoxic events and chromosomal instability. These genome damage events can be measured simultaneously in the cytokinesis-block micronucleus cytome (CBMNcyt) assay. The molecular mechanisms leading to these events have been investigated over the past two decades using molecular probes and genetically engineered cells. In this brief review, we summarise the wealth of knowledge currently available that best explains the formation of these important nuclear anomalies that are commonly seen in cancer and are indicative of genome damage events that could increase the risk of developmental and degenerative diseases. MN can originate during anaphase from lagging acentric chromosome or chromatid fragments caused by misrepair of DNA breaks or unrepaired DNA breaks. Malsegregation of whole chromosomes at anaphase may also lead to MN formation as a result of hypomethylation of repeat sequences in centromeric and pericentromeric DNA, defects in kinetochore proteins or assembly, dysfunctional spindle and defective anaphase checkpoint genes. NPB originate from dicentric chromosomes, which may occur due to misrepair of DNA breaks, telomere end fusions, and could also be observed when defective separation of sister chromatids at anaphase occurs due to failure of decatenation. NBUD represent the process of elimination of amplified DNA, DNA repair complexes and possibly excess chromosomes from aneuploid cells.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Examining the link between chromosomal instability and aneuploidy in human cells

              Solid tumors can be highly aneuploid and many display high rates of chromosome missegregation in a phenomenon called chromosomal instability (CIN). In principle, aneuploidy is the consequence of CIN, but the relationship between CIN and aneuploidy has not been clearly defined. In this study, we use live cell imaging and clonal cell analyses to evaluate the fidelity of chromosome segregation in chromosomally stable and unstable human cells. We show that improper microtubule–chromosome attachment (merotely) is a cause of chromosome missegregation in unstable cells and that increasing chromosome missegregation rates by elevating merotely during consecutive mitoses generates CIN in otherwise stable, near-diploid cells. However, chromosome missegregation compromises the proliferation of diploid cells, indicating that phenotypic changes that permit the propagation of nondiploid cells must combine with elevated chromosome missegregation rates to generate aneuploid cells with CIN.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Cell Biol
                J. Cell Biol
                jcb
                The Journal of Cell Biology
                Rockefeller University Press
                0021-9525
                1540-8140
                02 March 2020
                07 February 2020
                : 219
                : 3
                : e201905091
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA
                Author notes
                Correspondence to William Sullivan: sullivan@ 123456biology.ucsc.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8025-6246
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8357-7267
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1233-1910
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1756-4174
                Article
                jcb.201905091
                10.1083/jcb.201905091
                7054997
                32032426
                5ab5da21-1bc7-47f5-94d5-8de193809bc5
                © 2020 Warecki et al.

                This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms/). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 International license, as described at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).

                History
                : 13 May 2019
                : 05 November 2019
                : 18 December 2019
                Page count
                Pages: 22
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health, DOI http://doi.org/10.13039/100000002;
                Award ID: NIH1RO1GM120321
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health, DOI http://doi.org/10.13039/100000002;
                Award ID: 1S10OD23528-01
                Categories
                Article
                Cell Cycle and Division
                Cancer
                Genetics
                Membrane and Lipid Biology

                Cell biology
                Cell biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article