2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The correlation of substitution effects across populations and generations in the presence of nonadditive functional gene action

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Allele substitution effects at quantitative trait loci (QTL) are part of the basis of quantitative genetics theory and applications such as association analysis and genomic prediction. In the presence of nonadditive functional gene action, substitution effects are not constant across populations. We develop an original approach to model the difference in substitution effects across populations as a first order Taylor series expansion from a “focal” population. This expansion involves the difference in allele frequencies and second-order statistical effects (additive by additive and dominance). The change in allele frequencies is a function of relationships (or genetic distances) across populations. As a result, it is possible to estimate the correlation of substitution effects across two populations using three elements: magnitudes of additive, dominance, and additive by additive variances; relationships (Nei’s minimum distances or Fst indexes); and assumed heterozygosities. Similarly, the theory applies as well to distinct generations in a population, in which case the distance across generations is a function of increase of inbreeding. Simulation results confirmed our derivations. Slight biases were observed, depending on the nonadditive mechanism and the reference allele. Our derivations are useful to understand and forecast the possibility of prediction across populations and the similarity of GWAS effects.

          Abstract

          In presence of functional non-additive gene action, substitution effects at quantitative trait loci change across genetic backgrounds. This is relevant for genomic prediction and assessing the role of epistasis in evolution. Legarra et al. analytically derive differences of substitution effects across two populations, showing that these differences are functions of: the magnitude of additive, dominance and additive by additive variance; the genetic distance of the populations; and their heterozygosity. They illustrate these differences with simulation and real-life examples from literature.

          Related collections

          Most cited references65

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Clinical use of current polygenic risk scores may exacerbate health disparities

          Polygenic risk scores (PRS) are poised to improve biomedical outcomes via precision medicine. However, the major ethical and scientific challenge surrounding clinical implementation of PRS is that those available today are several times more accurate in individuals of European ancestry than other ancestries. This disparity is an inescapable consequence of Eurocentric biases in genome-wide association studies, thus highlighting that-unlike clinical biomarkers and prescription drugs, which may individually work better in some populations but do not ubiquitously perform far better in European populations-clinical uses of PRS today would systematically afford greater improvement for European-descent populations. Early diversifying efforts show promise in leveling this vast imbalance, even when non-European sample sizes are considerably smaller than the largest studies to date. To realize the full and equitable potential of PRS, greater diversity must be prioritized in genetic studies, and summary statistics must be publically disseminated to ensure that health disparities are not increased for those individuals already most underserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps.

            Recent advances in molecular genetic techniques will make dense marker maps available and genotyping many individuals for these markers feasible. Here we attempted to estimate the effects of approximately 50,000 marker haplotypes simultaneously from a limited number of phenotypic records. A genome of 1000 cM was simulated with a marker spacing of 1 cM. The markers surrounding every 1-cM region were combined into marker haplotypes. Due to finite population size N(e) = 100, the marker haplotypes were in linkage disequilibrium with the QTL located between the markers. Using least squares, all haplotype effects could not be estimated simultaneously. When only the biggest effects were included, they were overestimated and the accuracy of predicting genetic values of the offspring of the recorded animals was only 0.32. Best linear unbiased prediction of haplotype effects assumed equal variances associated to each 1-cM chromosomal segment, which yielded an accuracy of 0.73, although this assumption was far from true. Bayesian methods that assumed a prior distribution of the variance associated with each chromosome segment increased this accuracy to 0.85, even when the prior was not correct. It was concluded that selection on genetic values predicted from markers could substantially increase the rate of genetic gain in animals and plants, especially if combined with reproductive techniques to shorten the generation interval.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Rare and common variants: twenty arguments.

              Genome-wide association studies have greatly improved our understanding of the genetic basis of disease risk. The fact that they tend not to identify more than a fraction of the specific causal loci has led to divergence of opinion over whether most of the variance is hidden as numerous rare variants of large effect or as common variants of very small effect. Here I review 20 arguments for and against each of these models of the genetic basis of complex traits and conclude that both classes of effect can be readily reconciled.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                Genetics
                Genetics
                genetics
                Genetics
                Oxford University Press
                0016-6731
                1943-2631
                December 2021
                27 August 2021
                27 August 2021
                : 219
                : 4
                : iyab138
                Affiliations
                [1 ] INRAE/INP, UMR 1388 GenPhySE , Castanet-Tolosan 31326, France
                [2 ] Departamento de Producción Animal, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires , Buenos Aires C1417DSQ, Argentina
                [3 ] SAS NUCLEUS , Le Rheu 35650, France
                [4 ] Wageningen University & Research, Animal Breeding and Genomics , Wageningen 6700 AH, the Netherlands
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: INRAE, UMR1388 GenPhySE, CS 52627, 31326 Castanet Tolosan, France. Email: andres.legarra@ 123456inrae.fr
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8893-7620
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0681-2902
                Article
                iyab138
                10.1093/genetics/iyab138
                8664574
                34718531
                ab4ef33c-d720-43c3-84fc-ae7daec51415
                © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Genetics Society of America.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 30 October 2020
                : 19 August 2021
                Page count
                Pages: 12
                Funding
                Funded by: GenPhySE;
                Funded by: INRAE;
                Funded by: Netherlands Organisation of Scientific Research (NWO);
                Funded by: European Unions’ Horizon 2020 Research & Innovation programme;
                Award ID: N°772787
                Categories
                Investigation
                Gene Expression
                Featured
                AcademicSubjects/SCI01180
                AcademicSubjects/SCI01140
                AcademicSubjects/SCI00010
                AcademicSubjects/SCI00960

                Genetics
                qtl,substitution effects,epistasis,dominance,genetic distance
                Genetics
                qtl, substitution effects, epistasis, dominance, genetic distance

                Comments

                Comment on this article