70
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      APLP2 Regulates Refractive Error and Myopia Development in Mice and Humans

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Myopia is the most common vision disorder and the leading cause of visual impairment worldwide. However, gene variants identified to date explain less than 10% of the variance in refractive error, leaving the majority of heritability unexplained (“missing heritability”). Previously, we reported that expression of APLP2 was strongly associated with myopia in a primate model. Here, we found that low-frequency variants near the 5’-end of APLP2 were associated with refractive error in a prospective UK birth cohort (n = 3,819 children; top SNP rs188663068, p = 5.0 × 10 −4) and a CREAM consortium panel (n = 45,756 adults; top SNP rs7127037, p = 6.6 × 10 −3). These variants showed evidence of differential effect on childhood longitudinal refractive error trajectories depending on time spent reading (gene x time spent reading x age interaction, p = 4.0 × 10 −3). Furthermore, Aplp2 knockout mice developed high degrees of hyperopia (+11.5 ± 2.2 D, p < 1.0 × 10 −4) compared to both heterozygous (-0.8 ± 2.0 D, p < 1.0 × 10 −4) and wild-type (+0.3 ± 2.2 D, p < 1.0 × 10 −4) littermates and exhibited a dose-dependent reduction in susceptibility to environmentally induced myopia (F(2, 33) = 191.0, p < 1.0 × 10 −4). This phenotype was associated with reduced contrast sensitivity (F(12, 120) = 3.6, p = 1.5 × 10 −4) and changes in the electrophysiological properties of retinal amacrine cells, which expressed Aplp2. This work identifies APLP2 as one of the “missing” myopia genes, demonstrating the importance of a low-frequency gene variant in the development of human myopia. It also demonstrates an important role for APLP2 in refractive development in mice and humans, suggesting a high level of evolutionary conservation of the signaling pathways underlying refractive eye development.

          Author Summary

          Gene variants identified by GWAS studies to date explain only a small fraction of myopia cases because myopia represents a complex disorder thought to be controlled by dozens or even hundreds of genes. The majority of genetic variants underlying myopia seems to be of small effect and/or low frequency, which makes them difficult to identify using classical genetic approaches, such as GWAS, alone. Here, we combined gene expression profiling in a monkey model of myopia, human GWAS, and a gene-targeted mouse model of myopia to identify one of the “missing” myopia genes, APLP2. We found that a low-frequency risk allele of APLP2 confers susceptibility to myopia only in children exposed to large amounts of daily reading, thus, providing an experimental example of the long-hypothesized gene-environment interaction between nearwork and genes underlying myopia. Functional analysis of APLP2 using an APLP2 knockout mouse model confirmed functional significance of APLP2 in refractive development and implicated a potential role of synaptic transmission at the level of glycinergic amacrine cells of the retina for the development of myopia. Furthermore, mouse studies revealed that lack of Aplp2 has a dose-dependent suppressive effect on susceptibility to form-deprivation myopia, providing a potential gene-specific target for therapeutic intervention to treat myopia.

          Related collections

          Most cited references123

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Rd8 mutation of the Crb1 gene is present in vendor lines of C57BL/6N mice and embryonic stem cells, and confounds ocular induced mutant phenotypes.

          We noted an unexpected inheritance pattern of lesions in several strains of gene-manipulated mice with ocular phenotypes. The lesions, which appeared at various stages of backcross to C57BL/6, bore resemblance to the rd8 retinal degeneration phenotype. We set out to examine the prevalence of this mutation in induced mutant mouse lines, vendor C57BL/6 mice and in widely used embryonic stem cells. Ocular lesions were evaluated by fundus examination and histopathology. Detection of the rd8 mutation at the genetic level was performed by PCR with appropriate primers. Data were confirmed by DNA sequencing in selected cases. Analysis of several induced mutant mouse lines with ocular disease phenotypes revealed that the disease was associated 100% with the presence of the rd8 mutation in the Crb1 gene rather than with the gene of interest. DNA analysis of C57BL/6 mice from common commercial vendors demonstrated the presence of the rd8 mutation in homozygous form in all C57BL/6N substrains, but not in the C57BL/6J substrain. A series of commercially available embryonic stem cells of C57BL/6N origin and C57BL/6N mouse lines used to generate ES cells also contained the rd8 mutation. Affected mice displayed ocular lesions typical of rd8, which were detectable by funduscopy and histopathology as early as 6 weeks of age. These findings identify the presence of the rd8 mutation in the C57BL/6N mouse substrain used widely to produce transgenic and knockout mice. The results have grave implications for the vision research community who develop mouse lines to study eye disease, as presence of rd8 can produce significant disease phenotypes unrelated to the gene or genes of interest. It is suggested that researchers screen for rd8 if their mouse lines were generated on the C57BL/6N background, bear resemblance to the rd8 phenotype, or are of indeterminate origin.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Homeostasis of eye growth and the question of myopia.

            As with other organs, the eye's growth is regulated by homeostatic control mechanisms. Unlike other organs, the eye relies on vision as a principal input to guide growth. In this review, we consider several implications of this visual guidance. First, we compare the regulation of eye growth to that of other organs. Second, we ask how the visual system derives signals that distinguish the blur of an eye too large from one too small. Third, we ask what cascade of chemical signals constitutes this growth control system. Finally, if the match between the length and optics of the eye is under homeostatic control, why do children so commonly develop myopia, and why does the myopia not limit itself? Long-neglected studies may provide an answer to this last question.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Genome-wide meta-analyses of multiancestry cohorts identify multiple new susceptibility loci for refractive error and myopia.

              Refractive error is the most common eye disorder worldwide and is a prominent cause of blindness. Myopia affects over 30% of Western populations and up to 80% of Asians. The CREAM consortium conducted genome-wide meta-analyses, including 37,382 individuals from 27 studies of European ancestry and 8,376 from 5 Asian cohorts. We identified 16 new loci for refractive error in individuals of European ancestry, of which 8 were shared with Asians. Combined analysis identified 8 additional associated loci. The new loci include candidate genes with functions in neurotransmission (GRIA4), ion transport (KCNQ5), retinoic acid metabolism (RDH5), extracellular matrix remodeling (LAMA2 and BMP2) and eye development (SIX6 and PRSS56). We also confirmed previously reported associations with GJD2 and RASGRF1. Risk score analysis using associated SNPs showed a tenfold increased risk of myopia for individuals carrying the highest genetic load. Our results, based on a large meta-analysis across independent multiancestry studies, considerably advance understanding of the mechanisms involved in refractive error and myopia.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS Genet
                PLoS Genet
                plos
                plosgen
                PLoS Genetics
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1553-7390
                1553-7404
                27 August 2015
                August 2015
                : 11
                : 8
                : e1005432
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Ophthalmology, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America
                [2 ]Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America
                [3 ]School of Optometry & Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
                [4 ]Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
                [5 ]Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
                [6 ]Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London School of Medicine, London, United Kingdom
                [7 ]Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
                [8 ]Statistical Genetics Section, Inherited Disease Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute (NIH), Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
                [9 ]Department of Ophthalmology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, United States of America
                [10 ]Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, United States of America
                [11 ]Departments of Neurobiology, Neurology, and Pathology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America
                [12 ]School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
                Stanford University School of Medicine, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: AVT TVT JAG PGH CW. Performed the experiments: AVT TVT JAG VJMV PGH PKS AK CW. Analyzed the data: AVT TVT JAG VJMV PGH RW CW. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: GT. Wrote the paper: AVT TVT JAG VJMV PGH RW PKS AK GT CW.

                ¶ A full list of CREAM members and their affiliations appears in the Supporting Information.

                Article
                PGENETICS-D-15-00304
                10.1371/journal.pgen.1005432
                4551475
                26313004
                d35a12dc-2f89-4d32-b1dc-9229761cc9fb
                Copyright @ 2015

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

                History
                : 10 February 2015
                : 7 July 2015
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 0, Pages: 25
                Funding
                This work was supported by grants R21EY018902 and R01EY023839 from the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) and research grants from the Midwest Eye-Banks to AVT. The UK Medical Research Council and the Wellcome Trust (Grant ref: 102215/2/13/2) and the University of Bristol provide core support for ALSPAC; this research was supported specifically by the National Eye Research Centre, Bristol (SCIAD053); CW is supported by an NIHR Fellowship. JAG was supported by grant Z0GM from the Hong Kong Polytechnic University. GT is supported by grant R01AG019070, RW is supported by grant K08EY022943, AK is supported by grant R01EY019888 from NIH. We thank 23andMe for funding the generation of the ALSPAC GWA data. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files except for the gene expression and sequencing data, which were deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (Accession: GSE3300) and GeneBank (Accession: AY680431-AY680585).

                Genetics
                Genetics

                Comments

                Comment on this article